Susuz Yaz

Director's cruelty on animals, casts a shadow on his otherwise great film.

It was a nice experience to watch this unique 1963 film in the Criterion collection at Martin Scorsese's attempt. Cinema is Immortal. Thanks to Martin Scorsese, Giovanni Armani and Versace, I hope we watch more movies.

A cult movie. Best movie in 60s. Erol Tas is a great actor.

This is a tense, strong drama, although perhaps not for the squeamish. The photography is artistically done, on the other hand the looping is typical 60s; that is, artificial. Evocative use is made of the santur, a Turkish string instrument like a cimbalom. A completely different kind of music accompanies fights and scenes of violence. Then we switch to avant garde atonal riffs; here the instruments are Western. The camera is almost always close to the action, helping to create a sense of claustrophobia. The dialog is sparse; the director preferring to rely on meaningful glances. There are no snappy one-liners. Most of the film is easily understood without even looking at the subtitles. There are some particularly memorable, even disturbing images near the end. The title might be better translated as "Thirsty Summer," suggesting as it does the rapacity driving the main character.

An opposing and epical scenario in cold war period. Depriving the whole village of his property, a man changes the destiny of a society where he lives. In the end, he grabs there is no benefit of his own fortune as long as this fortune is shared..