Eagle in a Cage

Another man who didn't enjoy power so much might have found life on St. Helena pleasant enough. This rocky island in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean southern hemisphere seems a pleasant enough prison as a jail for one man alone. Kenneth Haigh as the exiled Napoleon Bonaparte has an old mistress in Billie Whitelaw visiting, he has a personal physician in Michael Williams. Even the governor of the island Ralph Richardson has his reasons for seeing to the exiled Emperor's comfort albeit Richardson is one stuffy bore.

But Bonaparte is about power and when visiting British Lord John Gielgud arrives with a proposition to get back to Europe with a Mission Impossible type mission Haigh is more than tempted. The United Kingdom had a Foreign Secretary at the time named Lord Castlereagh who firmly believed that Great Britain had no permanent friends or permanent enemies, just permanent interests. Gielgud is his representative in every way.

Only when the two acting knights are together does this film have any spark to it. I do so love the way Gielgud and Richardson play off each other, Gielgud the supreme cynic and Richardson a dull plodder.

But other than that the pace of this film is excruciatingly dull and sluggish. Not even Gielgud and Richardson can save it.

Somehow or other, Kenneth Haigh just hasn't the wherewithal to carry off this story of Napoleon's exile on St. Helena. What we are left with, despite decent efforts from Sir Ralph Richardson, Sir John Gielgud and Billie Whitelaw, is really as dull as the exiled Emperor's life must have actually been on the island at the time. Only once, could there be described as any action - otherwise it is all a very talky exercise that makes for 100 minutes of pretty wearisome stuff. There is some nice photography (of Yugoslavia) to be seen, but I'm struggling to think of anything else to write... Pity he didn't have a television set at the time for this - he might have died of boredom and saved thousands of lives!

"Eagle in a Cage" is a film about the exile of Napoleon to the island of St. Helena—where he was to remain until his death in 1821. It stars some nice British actors (such as Ralph Richardson and Billie Whitelaw) and no one had even a trace of a French accent—and this is especially true of Napoleon!

For the most part, this film consists of people on this island fortress standing around talking, talking and doing more talking. It's excruciatingly dull stuff. Had the film been about Napoleon's exile to Elba (from which he escaped and renewed the Napoleonic Wars), then it could have been interesting. The greatest interest in this one consisted of folks conspiring and a few raised eyebrows. Insipid stuff indeed and I have no idea why they bothered to make this film in the first place. The only people who MIGHT enjoy this are folks who think Napoleon was hot stuff—and, outside of France, there just aren't too many of those people. Not worth your time unless you are excruciatingly patient.

Kenneth Haigh is splendid as Napoleon and makes a very vivid and convincing interpretation of the caged, humiliated and.wing clipped former emperor and ruler of Europe in a performance on par with Rod Steiger and Herbert Lom. His young doctor O'Meara is played by Michael Williams, and he is just as good - it's these two characters that make the film. Ralph Richardson is also very convincing as the morbidly formal and correct Sir Hudson Lowe, who was responsible for Napoleon's confinement on St. Helena and in practice his jailer, as he admits himself, forcing Napoleon to live in the house that became his death. Sir John Gielgud does not appear until in the last half hour as lord Sissal, a very important political man, who wants to plot with Napoleon and make him interested in new political projects, which intrigue is interrupted by Napoleon's strange illness, which no one, least of all his doctor and himself, can understand. Two ladies are also involved, there are some efforts at some amorous intrigues, and there is also an attempt at an escape, but all that is part of the general speculations of the play and script. On the whole, it gives an intimate insight into the last pathetic chapter of Napoleon's rise and fall, and the acting and dialog is superb. This must not be missed by any historically interested cineast.

Gielgud is billed as the star, but he doesn't show up until the last part of the movie, and he appears in just a couple scenes. Nevertheless he chews up the scenery, especially in his scenes with Ralph Richardson. The two of them have a rip-roaring time the few brief moments they appear together. And this with scenes that, in the hands of lesser actors, you'd barely notice. I kept imagining how wonderful if there had been more of their handiwork to be seen in this movie.

There is a lot of top-drawer talent on display here, and they do justice to the interesting and literate screenplay by blacklisted writer Millard Lampell. Despite all this talent, it's difficult to call this a truly superior film. There's nothing to complain of, really, and, in fact, overall I liked it. It's just that without the historical context, there isn't much of a story. Perhaps that's an unfair criticism, given the unique and fascinating circumstance of Napoleon in exile. But a lot of other human dynamics are introduced into this situation that don't seem to add up to all that much.

The movie held my attention well enough, but it wasn't until Gielgud showed up that I realized how much was lacking. If you're a Napoleon buff, or a fan of Gielgud, Richardson, or Billie Whitlaw, this is worthwhile. If you're not, you may find it a bit of a disappointment.

Another reviewer notes that this is the most difficult movie on Napoleon to find. I saw it as part of a 50 DVD Movie Pack "War Classics." The print they transferred was in terrible condition, almost shockingly so. The movie deserves better.