Prends l'oseille et tire-toi!

"Take the Money and Run" is an absolutely hilarious Woody Allen film, done in a quasi-documentary style, about a career criminal, Virgil Starkwell, who has a very unsuccessful career. His prison breaks don't go as planned, his robberies are a disaster and usually coincide with someone else's robbery of the same place, and his planning of a job would be fine if only he weren't talking to an associate in a restaurant while the police are in the booth behind him. One nice perk of failure: while attempting to rob a young woman's purse, he falls in love with her (Janet Margolin). Virgil does admit at one point thinking of foregoing robbery and taking up a career in singing. He doesn't mention the cello, which gave him his start in music - and crime.

This is one of those laugh out loud even when you're alone movies of which there are all too few. But this is one. Over a tough, FBI-type narration, we watch Virgil's futile attempts at making money through crime, see his parents (disguised) interviewed, as well as his wife and the various police and investigators he meets along the way.

It's amazing to look at this film and then look at "Match Point" done 35 years later and see the evolution of this brilliant man. Woody Allen is capable of rock-solid comedy as well as provocative movie-making. Although he's had a few blips along the way, one wonders what he'll think of next.

Now I'm rarely a man to agree with any 'consensus view' of particular films, yet I very much have to go along with the tide as regards 'Take the Money and Run' - only the second Allen film I have commented upon here, though I have seen many more.

Basically, the film is enjoyable viewing throughout, but not an entirely consistent, successful comedy. Allen had yet to hone his skills in fashioning feature length films; I have reservations more so for 'Bananas', less so for 'Sleeper' and 'Love and Death'; the two films with which he really hits his stride. This is his first film as a director and thus maybe it is to be expected that we'll see a transitional film. One can tell Allen is trying to work out a formula to translate his largely verbal stand-up humour to film. He really does a pretty good job of this. There are plenty of very good jokes and a generally very lightweight, genial tone to this picture. It is seen through by this, yet is hamstrung by its very effervescence; the film is likeable and won me over, yet it is too scattershot in approach and delivery to really satisfy.

Woody himself is an instantly winning figure in his comic persona; that of a physically diminutive and verbally bumbling Jewish intellectual. With in this film the vocation of a bank robber; a displacement which results in much of the expected amusement. There's not yet any attempt to go very deep into this character of his, but this is a pure, light comedy. No real New York or indeed Bergman or Chekhov reference points yet.

One is reminded in Allen of David Thomson's insightful comments on Chaplin and the persona he projected to audiences; trying to charm them and win them over by a certain vulnerability and status as 'underdog'. It is very true that in many of Allen's films, like Chaplin, he is right at the centre of the film, and the world outside is not portrayed with any sense of the mechanics of reality. Conflicts are never all that serious or convincing; he draws from a limited pool of character types, in socio-political terms. Allen has done films with other leads; though his usual concerns always find their way through. 'Take the Money and Run' is full of the Chaplin tendency to have bullish, physically imposing figures, or indeed perhaps a wider society, threatening the 'little man'. There is a wish-fulfilment woman in the languid person of Janet Margolin's Louise; as a character more a projection than of flesh and blood or shades of grey. She works well as a slightly wan, attractive comic foil for Allen, who doesn't mind getting her hands dirty, but she's really not Diane Keaton.

This film is slight, no question about that... it fails under real scrutiny, yet it is largely very enticing stuff; an early glimpse of Allen getting his filmic technique in order. If you like what the man does - and surely most (wryly bespectacled) film cineastes such as I do! - then you are sure to enjoy this film. Just don't count on it being a triumph in the major key.

Rating:- *** 1/2/*****

Take the Money and Run (1969) was Woody Allen's motion picture debut (sans 'Tiger Lily). The film follows the life of a criminal loser, shot in a faux documentary style. Allen used the most out of his small budget and made an amusing film. This was the beginning of his slapstick/farce phase that would last until the early 70's. An interesting start for one of America's most unique film-makers of that era. The script by Mickey Rose and Woody Allen is deeply engraved with screwball humor from their childhood icons such as the Marx Brothers and Charles Chaplin. This film showed the promise of a brilliant director who would become a major player in Hollywood in the years to come. Highly recommended.

A.

For those of you who think that all Woody Allen's movies are vapid stories of neurotic rich New Yorkers, you need to see his early movies. "Take the Money and Run" is a good example. Allen plays Virgil Starkwell, an inept criminal. No matter what sort of crime he tries to pull off, something always goes wrong. Probably the funniest scene is when he tries to escape from jail like John Dillinger did. Other scenes include the time when the authorities use him in an experiment, with a silly result.

Anyway, Woody Allen's old movies were really funny. The thing was that he created a bunch of outlandish premises and infused his New York Jewish humor. This is what comedy is all about!

Virgil Starkwell was a product of his environment. Born into a poor family living in a rough community, Virgil soon finds companionship with a rough crowd and gets sucked into a life of petty crime from a very young age. An interest in the cello is not enough to set him straight and his acts continue into adulthood. Love, a powerful motivator, proves to be his undoing as he tries to rob a bank to fund his relationship.

We all talk about Allen's "earlier, funnier" films (even he does) but this probably doesn't extend the whole way to the very start of his film career because this, his second film, isn't up to the standard of Love & Death, Annie Hall and the like. The film is a mockumentary looking at the life and career of failing small-time criminal Virgil Starkwell and as such there is a basic narrative to provide some structure. Supposedly tightened up significantly in the editing room, the film is still pretty baggy at times and doesn't really have the material to carry it to even 85 minutes. However what the film does do well is produce plenty of imaginative moments that made me laugh out of nothing. I think of the scene where Virgil hires a car to run his blackmailer down, the spelling errors on the notes and others that are imaginative twists on what you expect and funnier for it. The one liners (and dialogue generally) is not as strong as Allen fans would hope for because the humour tends towards the sight gag.

This isn't a criticism because the sight gags are mostly good but the problem is one of consistency. I wasn't laughing anywhere enough for this to be a memorable comedy and there were quite a few lulls. These came particularly where the film had a section of narrative or dialogue rather than fast visual snippets under the narrator – it is the latter that are the strongest parts of the film but they can't come quick enough and there isn't enough to support it in-between. Allen makes a good lead of course and I found him to be very good at delivering the visual comedy. Margolin is a bit too stiff; not good enough at the comedy or the dramatic stuff. The rest of the support cast does what they are required to do but the film does belong to Allen and his script. Credit should go to editor Rosenblum for making it as tight as possible and keeping the visual gags flowing as best as he can while limiting the weaker dialogue bits.

Overall then an amusing film that will appeal mostly to Woody Allen films. There are plenty of imaginative comedy moments but it is not as consistent as it needed to be to consider it on the same level as Allen's finest films (that would follow this in the 1970's in my opinion).