[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Le Retour de la mouche

Original title: Return of the Fly
  • 1959
  • Approved
  • 1h 20m
IMDb RATING
5.7/10
5.5K
YOUR RATING
Le Retour de la mouche (1959)
Home Video Trailer from 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
Play trailer1:37
1 Video
53 Photos
DramaFantasyHorrorSci-FiThriller

Philippe Delambre, the now-adult son of "The Fly", does some transportation experimentation of his own.Philippe Delambre, the now-adult son of "The Fly", does some transportation experimentation of his own.Philippe Delambre, the now-adult son of "The Fly", does some transportation experimentation of his own.

  • Director
    • Edward Bernds
  • Writers
    • Edward Bernds
    • George Langelaan
  • Stars
    • Vincent Price
    • Brett Halsey
    • David Frankham
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    5.7/10
    5.5K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Edward Bernds
    • Writers
      • Edward Bernds
      • George Langelaan
    • Stars
      • Vincent Price
      • Brett Halsey
      • David Frankham
    • 68User reviews
    • 48Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    Return of the Fly
    Trailer 1:37
    Return of the Fly

    Photos53

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 45
    View Poster

    Top cast21

    Edit
    Vincent Price
    Vincent Price
    • Francois Delambre
    Brett Halsey
    Brett Halsey
    • Philippe Delambre
    David Frankham
    David Frankham
    • Ronald Holmes, alias Alan Hinds
    John Sutton
    John Sutton
    • Insp. Beecham
    Dan Seymour
    Dan Seymour
    • Max Barthold
    Danielle De Metz
    Danielle De Metz
    • Cecile Bonnard
    Jack Daly
    • Granville (reporter)
    Janine Grandel
    • Mme. Bonnard
    Michael Mark
    Michael Mark
    • Gaston (watchman)
    Richard Flato
    • Sgt. Dubois
    Gregg Martell
    Gregg Martell
    • Cop
    Barry Bernard
    • Lt. MacLish
    Pat O'Hara
    Pat O'Hara
    • Insp. Evans
    Francisco Villalobos
    • Priest
    • (as Francisco Villalobas)
    Joan Cotton
    • Nurse
    Court Shepard
    • Policeman
    • (uncredited)
    Florence Strom
    • Nun
    • (uncredited)
    Rick Turner
    • Policeman
    • (uncredited)
    • Director
      • Edward Bernds
    • Writers
      • Edward Bernds
      • George Langelaan
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews68

    5.75.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    8planktonrules

    A worthy follow-up.

    "The Return of the Fly" takes place many years after "The Fly". The dead scientist from the original film had a son, Philippe, and this young man has grown up and has a fixation of finishing his father's experiments...the same one that turned him into two fly/human hybrids. However, what he doesn't know is that his friend and lab assistant, Alan, is evil and plans on stealing the project. Ultimately, Alan deliberately turns Philippe into the hybrids and shoots Philippe's uncle (Vincent Price) as well!! What a jerk-face! Can they manage to find both fly-brids and reintegrate them back to the creatures they once were? And, can Alan be punished for his infamy?

    Rarely would I say this, but this sequel is about equal in quality to the original film. Considering it came out only a year later, this isn't such a huge surprise. It also managed to be creative and original as well as entertaining. Well worth seeing...just like the prior film.
    Snow Leopard

    Works Well As Light Entertainment, As Long As It's Not Compared With the Original

    This is the kind of sequel that can be rather enjoyable as long as you don't hold it up to the standard of the original. It does bear the signs of a movie that was conceived primarily to capitalize on the popularity of its predecessor, and as a result it is hardly as carefully constructed. But as light entertainment, it works well enough.

    The first part of the movie connects things up pretty efficiently with the original story, and it's kind of fun to go back to André's wrecked lab, which looks just as it should. Brett Halsey plays André's son Philippe, who is determined to follow in his father's footsteps. While the setup could have led in a number of different directions, the story that actually follows puts an emphasis on action, and it uses the special visual effects rather more freely than in the original "Fly".

    From a scientific viewpoint, the whole premise of both movies is far-fetched at best, but in the original, you rarely thought about it because the story was so tightly constructed. In the sequel, the implausibility of the whole thing is harder to ignore. It doesn't detract that much from the entertainment value, but it is a noticeable difference from the first movie.

    Except for Vincent Price, the cast is new, but solid. While the production might have a couple of rough edges this time, most of it still looks good enough. Overall, with the right expectations this is a generally entertaining light feature.
    Brevity

    It's quite hilarious, which, you know, wasn't probably the intention

    While the fly "makeup" is as ridiculous as in the original, it's got nothing on the guinea pig paws. Add in obvious, under-lining music, delayed reactions, a clumsy fly-man, some overacting, action reminiscent of the old "Batman" series, "help me, help me" revisited, some fly-staring, 50s special effects - the "disintegrator-integrator" machine of the old beep-beep type (you can imagine the sounds), not to mention the creatures themselves, is amusing as anything - and some rodent-squelching, and you got yourself laughs aplenty.

    The editing is really messy and ugly; there's much dead air in between, even though the film barely runs for 80 minutes! The camera-work is awkward as well.

    The cliché-filled dialogue is often amusing, intentionally or not, with some of the highlights being the "if I tell you, it'll haunt you for the rest of your life" exchange, the whole bad guy routine and "the murderous brain of the fly". The what?

    I don't think this was done tongue-in-cheek. It's basically the same story as in the original, which makes it seem redundant, but hey, it's mostly entertaining, so I guess that evens it out. Notice how I used the word "mostly".
    6lost-in-limbo

    Following in father's footsteps.

    Phillippe the son of the infamous Dr. Delambre, who still has an air of mystery around his death, is now a young man who has taken over his father's work, which his uncle Francois wants him to forget about. Though he gets conned into backing the experiment and that's only if he can supervise the project, so it doesn't happen again. The experiment is going quite well, up until later on when Phillippe finds out his mischievous assistant has betrayed him, as he's secretly selling the idea of the teleportation device to another backer. So, to stop the word getting out, his assistant provides him with the same fate that his father had fought. Now, it's a race against time for Francois and Inspector Beecham to save Phillippe from the same aftermath of his father.

    Right of the back of the original film, comes a rather quickie of a sequel that doesn't push any limits. Firstly, no way does it come close to the superior original, but as an automatic b-grade monster feature, it's provides enough rollicking fun. Well, when you got Price on show, how can you go wrong? What we get is a bland story structure that lacks an ounce of life and astuteness, though it does have a few inspired moments, but these are far and in between many inferior sequences that come off just plain ordinary with some confusing plot details. The original managed to work around the silly context, but here it tends accept it by working in laughable story turns and monster effects. Even the dialog seems more like schlock, without the savvy and witty dialog that made the first film naturally engaging. The performances are all but cold and lifeless, but with the obvious exception of Vincent Price. He just has a spellbinding presence that when the words roll of his tongue, it has a Shakespearean vibe, no matter how bad the lines were. Price's performance is definitely this film's anchor. The rest of the characters I didn't care for, as they are rather unsympathetic and foolish.

    There was just more attention to fabricating unpleasant and cheap thrills, which are more out of control with a monster out for revenge hook-line. It's more violent than its predecessor too. I give it credit that it's more exciting in its basic dementia of its creation, but hell the treatment of the story and effects were laughable. That's unintentionally, though. This one seems more serious, but it's outlandishly executed in a drab fashion. But ironically everything works out in the long run with a happy ending for all… well for the good guys. Now the effects are decent, but when it came to the fly's head on the human body. Why was it that huge!? It looks stupid! Sure, it looks even more hideous, but you got to be kidding, it was funny watching the guy running along while holding onto it, so it doesn't fall off. You could easily tell the guy was having trouble with it, even so when walking! They really out did themselves on that one.

    Another note was that the pacing is rather brisk, gladly. Also it does provide slight dose of suspense and atmosphere, but more so it's preoccupied in its second-rate chills and mayhem instead. The flick is shot in black and white, and it does look rather sharp and crisp in detail. Plus there's some showy photography and framework that adds a bit more creative eye to the wailing production. The story's actions on this occasion were just too ridiculous to take seriously with it getting more risible the further it goes, but it seems pretty unaware to all of that.

    It's not all that bad, but the quality is replaced by big chunks of camp that's more interested in wowing us with ludicrous action, rather then the strain it has on the characters and their relationships. Still, there's b-grade fun to be had here.
    5Doylenf

    A quickie capitalizes on the popularity of the original...

    BRETT HALSEY is one of those handsome young actors from the '50s who never quite made it to stardom, and following the trend of other such actors, he fled to Europe where he found a niche for a decade or so in adventure films. He was certainly a competent enough actor and it's a shame Fox never groomed him for major stardom.

    Nor did Fox have enough faith in this one to use technicolor (as they did for the original). As sequels go, it's just a fair job on an obviously shoestring budget--and basically, without giving any of the storyline away, it's a story of revenge.

    It's all suitably photographed in low key B&W lighting that gives it the proper atmosphere. The performers are capable enough--including Halsey, Vincent Price, John Sutton and Dan Seymour--but their material is scarcely worthy of their combined talents. Fans of this sort of science fiction will no doubt find it has a certain amount of interest.

    Anyone who enjoyed "The Fly" will want to see this and probably not be too critical of the shortcomings--although the special effects are not quite as harrowing as they could be.

    Summing up: Okay for a viewing, but not likely to be the kind of horror flick anyone will want to revisit.

    More like this

    La malédiction de la mouche
    5.1
    La malédiction de la mouche
    La Mouche noire
    7.1
    La Mouche noire
    La Mouche 2
    5.2
    La Mouche 2
    Le Désosseur de cadavres
    6.6
    Le Désosseur de cadavres
    L'Homme au masque de cire
    7.0
    L'Homme au masque de cire
    Le Loup-garou
    5.8
    Le Loup-garou
    Les monstres sur notre planète
    6.3
    Les monstres sur notre planète
    La Revanche de la créature
    5.6
    La Revanche de la créature
    Les Maléfices de la momie
    5.6
    Les Maléfices de la momie
    The Alligator People
    5.6
    The Alligator People
    La Tombe de la momie
    5.5
    La Tombe de la momie
    L'étrange histoire du juge Cordier
    6.3
    L'étrange histoire du juge Cordier

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Vincent Price signed on for the film after reading the first draft of its script; however, the studio demanded re-writes in order to reduce production costs. The re-writes reportedly removed much of what Price liked about the film's first draft.
    • Goofs
      In the film, when Francois and Philippe visit Andre's laboratory from the previous film La Mouche noire (1958), the messages Andre wrote to Helene on the blackboard can still be seen on it. But at the end of that same film, Helene had told Inspector Charas that she had erased them all off of the blackboard in order to cover up all traces of Andre's experiment.
    • Quotes

      Philippe Delambre: [as a housefly] Cecile! Help me! I'm here on the floor! Cecile! Help me!

    • Alternate versions
      For UK cinemas, the BBFC imposed a brief cut to remove the shot of Alan crushing the hybrid guinea pig with his foot. Later video releases were uncut.
    • Connections
      Featured in Creature Features: Return of the Fly (1971)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ

    • How long is Return of the Fly?
      Powered by Alexa
    • Is "Return of the Fly" based on a book?
    • How long after "The Fly" ends does "Return of the Fly" take place?
    • Why was this sequel shot in black-and-white when the original was in color?

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • July 22, 1959 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Languages
      • English
      • French
    • Also known as
      • El retorno de la mosca
    • Filming locations
      • 20th Century Fox Studios - 10201 Pico Blvd., Century City, Los Angeles, California, USA
    • Production companies
      • Twentieth Century Fox
      • Associated Producers (API)
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $225,000 (estimated)
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 20 minutes
    • Color
      • Black and White
    • Aspect ratio
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    Le Retour de la mouche (1959)
    Top Gap
    By what name was Le Retour de la mouche (1959) officially released in India in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.