A prince, framed for murder and starved for affection from his father, is sent on a quest.A prince, framed for murder and starved for affection from his father, is sent on a quest.A prince, framed for murder and starved for affection from his father, is sent on a quest.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I waited years for an opportunity to see this films. Any aficionado of Japanese cinema probably would, as the Toho mega-production stars half of Japan's greatest actors and actresses. So when the opportunity finally came, I really wanted to like this film. I really wanted to get sucked into its world. After watching the film, which is three hours in duration, I was left perplexed. Not only, because so much of the plot-line is so difficult to comprehend, but because so much money had been invested to a production, to which so little thought had been given.
The film is called "Nippon tanjo". This literally means "The birth of Japan", though the film has been distributed to west as "The Three Treasures". The distributed copy cut the running time to two hours, and whereas usually that qualifies as butchery of a film, "Nippon tanjo" could actually benefit from such maneuvering, as cutting down the strangest bits, and the long gaps where nothing of substance occurs, would make the film much more watchable.
Anyways. This film is based on the legends of "Kojiki" and "Nihon shoki", which are the two oldest texts from Japan. They relate how the world, the Japanese archipelago, the imperial line of Japan and the Shinto faith were born. This film has been called the Japanese equivalent to Cecil B. DeMille's biblical spectacles, and in some ways it's an accurate way to frame it. The film starts with the gods creating the earth, and then turns into the story of the hero protagonist, played by Mifune Toshiro. He is a prince, who is accused of a crime he didn't do, so he has to go on a journey, to prove that he is a good person, and also to kill monsters. Every now and then we get scenes with the gods, confusing the narrative exponentially.
I personally like the romanticized notions of nations filming their historical origins, even if they take artistic liberties with these narratives. I think a narrative, where Mifune as a prince kills monsters could potentially be very watchable. Yet I did not find "Nippon tanjo" to be watchable. The film has a wonderful cast, everybody from Tanaka Kinuyo to Nakamura Ganjiro, and from Hara Setsuko to Shimura Takashi. It is directed by the experienced Inagaki Hiroshi. But the screenplay, by two talented writers Kikushima Ryûzô and Yasumi Toshio, fails to resonate in almost every way. None of the actors receive a character to which they can breath life into. These are all historical ideals, and not relatable three-dimensional personas. The film is superficial even more than DeMille's biblical works. I felt much of the cast, especially Hara Setsuko in one of her weirder turns, is absolutely wasted on this project.
The film also refuses to get going. As a narrative, it is stale and uninteresting. It is also confusing, even if one is somewhat aware of the legends to which it is based on. The campy aesthetics used in the scenes among the gods reminded me of 1960's "Star Trek". They are really weird for weird sake, at least visually. And the scenes in the film go on forever. Also, after so much anticipation, the monsters aren't that well produced either, and the multi-headed sea snake looked kind of lame.
I don't know what to really praise in this production. I like the idea of this film, I just thoroughly did not care for the execution of the idea.
The film is called "Nippon tanjo". This literally means "The birth of Japan", though the film has been distributed to west as "The Three Treasures". The distributed copy cut the running time to two hours, and whereas usually that qualifies as butchery of a film, "Nippon tanjo" could actually benefit from such maneuvering, as cutting down the strangest bits, and the long gaps where nothing of substance occurs, would make the film much more watchable.
Anyways. This film is based on the legends of "Kojiki" and "Nihon shoki", which are the two oldest texts from Japan. They relate how the world, the Japanese archipelago, the imperial line of Japan and the Shinto faith were born. This film has been called the Japanese equivalent to Cecil B. DeMille's biblical spectacles, and in some ways it's an accurate way to frame it. The film starts with the gods creating the earth, and then turns into the story of the hero protagonist, played by Mifune Toshiro. He is a prince, who is accused of a crime he didn't do, so he has to go on a journey, to prove that he is a good person, and also to kill monsters. Every now and then we get scenes with the gods, confusing the narrative exponentially.
I personally like the romanticized notions of nations filming their historical origins, even if they take artistic liberties with these narratives. I think a narrative, where Mifune as a prince kills monsters could potentially be very watchable. Yet I did not find "Nippon tanjo" to be watchable. The film has a wonderful cast, everybody from Tanaka Kinuyo to Nakamura Ganjiro, and from Hara Setsuko to Shimura Takashi. It is directed by the experienced Inagaki Hiroshi. But the screenplay, by two talented writers Kikushima Ryûzô and Yasumi Toshio, fails to resonate in almost every way. None of the actors receive a character to which they can breath life into. These are all historical ideals, and not relatable three-dimensional personas. The film is superficial even more than DeMille's biblical works. I felt much of the cast, especially Hara Setsuko in one of her weirder turns, is absolutely wasted on this project.
The film also refuses to get going. As a narrative, it is stale and uninteresting. It is also confusing, even if one is somewhat aware of the legends to which it is based on. The campy aesthetics used in the scenes among the gods reminded me of 1960's "Star Trek". They are really weird for weird sake, at least visually. And the scenes in the film go on forever. Also, after so much anticipation, the monsters aren't that well produced either, and the multi-headed sea snake looked kind of lame.
I don't know what to really praise in this production. I like the idea of this film, I just thoroughly did not care for the execution of the idea.
The Japanese equivalent of 1956's The Ten Comandments. A lot of this features nomads wondering around in a desert on camels. Then there's Toshiro Mifune, who slays a hydra-esque dragon at the end. As usual, Toshiro Mifune is great. This is a great movie, with an excellent Ifukube score and Tsuburaya special effects but this is just too darn long and slow paced, it's really a chore to sit through. I still recommend it though.
It's almost daunting from the outset, even on paper, to observe the veritable who's who of names and faces who had been operating both behind the scenes and in front of the camera for Toho, for years. The considerable length of three hours is also nothing to sneeze at. It seems terribly ambitious by these measures alone, nevermind the notion of recounting the myths and legends of ancient Japan, and fashioning a tokusatsu epic to rival the most grandiose contemporary epics of Hollywood. With great aspirations come great risk, but great risk also promises great reward upon success. Broadly enjoyable as 'The birth of Japan' is,' and admirable in no few ways with its enormous production, in this instance its overall success is nevertheless somewhat mixed. There is much to appreciate, certainly, but the rough edges in the production are just as evident, and the result is simply not all that it could have been. Even so, the ultimate quality is undeniable, and more than not thsi remains very worthwhile.
Toho wanted a spectacle, and by Jove, they got one. The filming locations are gorgeous, and the sets just as beautiful if not more so, whether we're speaking those rooted in reality or those of a much more fantastical nature. Exquisite imagination and detail was poured into the production design and art direction, and much could be said of other tangible facets like the costume design, hair, and makeup. All this is even more resplendent given the Agfacolor processing from which the movie benefits; if marginally less vibrant here than what we've seen elsewhere, in my estimation mid-century Agfacolor stands right alongside the comparable techniques and technology of contemporary Technicolor, or Eastmancolor, in being more glorious and desirable than what more modern film or digital processing is able to provide. This is to say nothing of the excellent stunts and action sequences, entrancing choreography, or the outstanding effects supervised by Japanese icon Tsuburaya Eiji, as rich and tantalizing as any he had ever given us. The picture further benefits from another terrific, thunderous, dynamic score by esteemed composer Ifukube Akira, ably complementing every mood and scene, and lending tinges of whimsical atmosphere and ponderous gravity to the proceedings. And as if all this weren't enough, we definitely can't fault the cast with their spirited performances, least of all screen legend Mifune Toshiro who invariably walks as if a titan among men.
Be all that as it may, in other regards 'The birth of Japan' is not so sure-footed. We know very well what filmmaker Inagaki Hiroshi is capable of at his best, readily demonstrated in the essential "Samurai trilogy" of 1954-56. He is not infallible, however; in 1969's 'Samurai banners,' for example, the presentation was hindered by an undeniable brusqueness that shortchanged the intended impact off the saga. This 1959 feature is at times marked by that same brusqueness, and is perhaps a smidgen overcharged and uncareful. It's not true across the board, and some sequences are indeed altogether superb; as one example, against all odds, a battle against a kaiju really is one of the top highlights here, being characterized by discernible effort and discretion. Yet other instances are not so fortunate, and some moments kind of raise a skeptical eyebrow. Taira Kazuji's editing is similarly troubled, often bearing a forced, unnatural curtness that's off-putting and regrettable. And in all earnestness, Yasumi Toshio and Kikushima Ryuzo's screenplay also shares the burden of responsibility. The framing is particularly difficult as to some degree we get two stories told in bursts, one within the other, and the shifts to and fro are not always handled so smoothly, producing some disjointedness. But this isn't the only issue facing the writing. It struggles at times to find the right tone, a matter echoed in Inagaki's direction. The writing also struggles at times with basic cohesiveness, as if Yasumi and Kikushima had difficulty devising the best way to communicate some scenes, beats, or ideas, let alone portions of the dialogue. I'll grant the possibility that some such problems in the writing may appear more pronounced for those who are unfamiliar with Japan's tales of yore, but that doesn't make them go away outright.
Still, though I've spoken at length of the faults with this title, it's hardly as if the sum total is bad. On the contrary, more than not it's very commendably well made, and solidly enjoyable. Even with some rockiness in how it is written and realized, the story is compelling and entertaining. Action, adventure, and drama are swirled together with hearty doses of fantasy, and scenes are reliably flavorful despite their imperfections. Not least with Tsuburaya on hand the big action and effects sequences are rather superb - absolutely including the last stretch - reminding in their own way of the most celebrated kindred endeavors seen in Cecil B. DeMille's 'The ten commandments,' William Wyler's 'Ben-Hur,' and other equally fanciful pieces such as 'The 7th voyage of Sinbad,' if not also jidaigeki classics from the same period. It may never achieve the full desired potency, but it endeavored mightily to do so; I recognize what it tried to do, and it does quite well. Would that the writing, direction, and editing were as perfectly, faithfully mindful as Ifukube was with his music, as Tsuburaya with his effects, and all others behind the scenes were with their contributions, for I do think that even the acting is affected in turn - and all the same 'The birth of Japan' surely even gathers strength in the latter half, with those perceived flaws diminishing. It's not wholly impeccable, but in fairness, neither are the most commonly noted points of comparison. Warts and all, Toho's ambitions paid off handsomely more than they did not, and in general I had a good time watching. Unless you're a diehard fan of someone involved there's no need to go out of your way for this, but if you do have the chance to check it out and a big block of time to spare, it's a movie that firmly earns a warm recommendation.
Toho wanted a spectacle, and by Jove, they got one. The filming locations are gorgeous, and the sets just as beautiful if not more so, whether we're speaking those rooted in reality or those of a much more fantastical nature. Exquisite imagination and detail was poured into the production design and art direction, and much could be said of other tangible facets like the costume design, hair, and makeup. All this is even more resplendent given the Agfacolor processing from which the movie benefits; if marginally less vibrant here than what we've seen elsewhere, in my estimation mid-century Agfacolor stands right alongside the comparable techniques and technology of contemporary Technicolor, or Eastmancolor, in being more glorious and desirable than what more modern film or digital processing is able to provide. This is to say nothing of the excellent stunts and action sequences, entrancing choreography, or the outstanding effects supervised by Japanese icon Tsuburaya Eiji, as rich and tantalizing as any he had ever given us. The picture further benefits from another terrific, thunderous, dynamic score by esteemed composer Ifukube Akira, ably complementing every mood and scene, and lending tinges of whimsical atmosphere and ponderous gravity to the proceedings. And as if all this weren't enough, we definitely can't fault the cast with their spirited performances, least of all screen legend Mifune Toshiro who invariably walks as if a titan among men.
Be all that as it may, in other regards 'The birth of Japan' is not so sure-footed. We know very well what filmmaker Inagaki Hiroshi is capable of at his best, readily demonstrated in the essential "Samurai trilogy" of 1954-56. He is not infallible, however; in 1969's 'Samurai banners,' for example, the presentation was hindered by an undeniable brusqueness that shortchanged the intended impact off the saga. This 1959 feature is at times marked by that same brusqueness, and is perhaps a smidgen overcharged and uncareful. It's not true across the board, and some sequences are indeed altogether superb; as one example, against all odds, a battle against a kaiju really is one of the top highlights here, being characterized by discernible effort and discretion. Yet other instances are not so fortunate, and some moments kind of raise a skeptical eyebrow. Taira Kazuji's editing is similarly troubled, often bearing a forced, unnatural curtness that's off-putting and regrettable. And in all earnestness, Yasumi Toshio and Kikushima Ryuzo's screenplay also shares the burden of responsibility. The framing is particularly difficult as to some degree we get two stories told in bursts, one within the other, and the shifts to and fro are not always handled so smoothly, producing some disjointedness. But this isn't the only issue facing the writing. It struggles at times to find the right tone, a matter echoed in Inagaki's direction. The writing also struggles at times with basic cohesiveness, as if Yasumi and Kikushima had difficulty devising the best way to communicate some scenes, beats, or ideas, let alone portions of the dialogue. I'll grant the possibility that some such problems in the writing may appear more pronounced for those who are unfamiliar with Japan's tales of yore, but that doesn't make them go away outright.
Still, though I've spoken at length of the faults with this title, it's hardly as if the sum total is bad. On the contrary, more than not it's very commendably well made, and solidly enjoyable. Even with some rockiness in how it is written and realized, the story is compelling and entertaining. Action, adventure, and drama are swirled together with hearty doses of fantasy, and scenes are reliably flavorful despite their imperfections. Not least with Tsuburaya on hand the big action and effects sequences are rather superb - absolutely including the last stretch - reminding in their own way of the most celebrated kindred endeavors seen in Cecil B. DeMille's 'The ten commandments,' William Wyler's 'Ben-Hur,' and other equally fanciful pieces such as 'The 7th voyage of Sinbad,' if not also jidaigeki classics from the same period. It may never achieve the full desired potency, but it endeavored mightily to do so; I recognize what it tried to do, and it does quite well. Would that the writing, direction, and editing were as perfectly, faithfully mindful as Ifukube was with his music, as Tsuburaya with his effects, and all others behind the scenes were with their contributions, for I do think that even the acting is affected in turn - and all the same 'The birth of Japan' surely even gathers strength in the latter half, with those perceived flaws diminishing. It's not wholly impeccable, but in fairness, neither are the most commonly noted points of comparison. Warts and all, Toho's ambitions paid off handsomely more than they did not, and in general I had a good time watching. Unless you're a diehard fan of someone involved there's no need to go out of your way for this, but if you do have the chance to check it out and a big block of time to spare, it's a movie that firmly earns a warm recommendation.
I was unfamiliar with the story behind The Three Treasures and the legendary founding of Japan and Shintoism, and I found the film hard to follow, overly long, and ultimately a bit boring (even the fight between Susanoo (the great Toshiro Mifune) and the eight-headed dragon). Some of the imagery and special effects (from Toho Studios master Eiji Tsuburaya) were very good and the acting fine (for an action-fantasy film). Mifune is fine in the dual role of Prince Yamato Takeru and Susanoo, although I found the Prince's constant credulousness tiring (he is repeatedly lied to yet seems to believe everything he's told). I think I'd need more background in Japanese history and culture to really appreciate this film (fortunately not required to enjoy Toho's rollicking kaiju epics).
Good, Good and Good, this is the only adjective possible to be used to this jewel of the Japanese cinematography. Culturally is a film to be seen by all, it is amusing and interesting. Here we all learn how we can fight bad things with good behavior and polite talk, something nearly forgotten during these days. The film shows that not always the man can be peaceful but good feelings from humans can help a lot to avoid the violence.
Did you know
- TriviaThis was, not surprisingly, Toho's highest grossing film of 1959 and the second highest grossing film in Japan overall.
- Quotes
Prince Yamato Takeru: When he sent me to fight Kumaso, he only gave me a few men. And now I just came back, and he sends me to fight in the East! He loves my brothers more than me! He wants me to die!
[He sobs]
- Alternate versionsA little over a year later, in 1960, Toho's subsidiary, Toho International, released this film in the United States in a subtitled version cut down to 112 minutes and titled "The Three Treasures."
- ConnectionsFeatured in Gojira to hiroin (2020)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Three Treasures
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime3 hours 2 minutes
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content