Le Temps d'aimer et le Temps de mourir

While not liking every film Douglas Sirk did (my recent viewing of 'Magnificent Obsession' for example really underwhelmed me, sorry to anybody who disagrees and they undoubtedly exist), he was an interesting director and one of the most interesting when it came to melodramas which he specialised in. His melodramas are not for all tastes definitely, with some working much better than others, but at his best (i.e. 'Imitation of Life') his films were brilliant.

'A Time to Love and a Time to Die', a title that some people are going to love and others are going to hate (even if it is an over-the-top one it is generally a poetic one in my view and pretty much sums up what the film is about), may not be one of Sirk's best. Having said that, while it is not perfect by any stretch, it is one of his most interesting with the subject matter for example and also one of his most underrated and deserving of more credit than it does.

It isn't without problems in my view. It does run a little too long and it makes the film occasionally drawn out, the romance occasionally slows things down a bit. Some of the dialogue is rather soapy and could have had more punch, at least it is not as unintentionally camp or as sentiment-heavy as some of Sirk's other films.

Did feel generally that debuting John Gavin, once you try to get over the fact that he is not remotely believable as a German, didn't do too badly a job, but inexperience does show initially where he doesn't always look comfortable.

Mostly he plays his role with authority and pathos and Liselotte Pulver is both fetching and affecting as his love interest. Their chemistry is charming. Keenan Wynn and Charles Regnier are memorable in support, the whole cast in fact give everything they've got and make characters that sound on paper cliched and potentially sketchy interesting and certainly more plausible than those in other Sirk films, the conflict having tension too. 'A Time to Love and a Time to Die' looks great and is especially lavishly and not too glossily shot. Miklos Rozsa's score is sweeping and haunting.

Sirk's direction has the sensitivity and passion that was missing in 'Magnificent Obsession' and the war scenes are staged very powerfully without being cluttered. While the script is not perfect it is sincere on the whole and as said it is not camp and sentimental. Furthermore, 'A Time to Love and a Time to Die' is an emotionally powerful film without being manipulative or over-sentimentalised, the war scenes are harrowing and poignant. The ending is shocking and really did appreciate that it didn't go the too pat route like other Sirk films did.

Overall, interesting and powerful film that deserves more credit than it does. 7/10

The films of Douglas Sirk have been variously described as "masterpieces" and "tosh". I think the answer lies somewhere in between. Certainly the series he made at the peak of his career for Universal International in the 'fifties are romantic melodramas of a superior kind. Although photographed in gaudy chocolate-box colours with soundtracks overladen with scores drenched in aural syrup and with sometimes the most outlandish of plots - "Magnificant Obsession" for instance - they have, beneath their surface glitter, a hard edged observation of an affluent American society struggling to come to grips with moral values - "All that Heaven Allows" and "Imitation of Life" are particularly good examples. But, interesting as these film are, it is the odd man out, a film set not in America at all but in Germany and the eastern front in the closing stages of the Second World War, "A Time to Love and a Time to Die", that, in spite of its not inconsiderable unevenness, could well be his most lasting legacy. Its most striking feature is that, notwithstanding its vastly different territory, it remains a Sirk film stylistically. The director almost seems to be signing his signature with the shot of pink blossom against the opening and closing credits. Although the outer sections of a German unit under shellfire on the eastern front are the very stuff of warscape recreation at their near best, it is the long central passage where the young German soldier - surprisingly well played by John Gavin - returns on leave to his heavily bombed town, that is the most Sirkian. Here, between devastating airaids, the hero forms an idyllic romantic attachment to a vaguely remembered friend from childhood followed by a whirlwind courtship. Amazingly for the last night of his leave the couple find, amidst all the devastation, an untouched house for the consumation of their marriage, where they are tended by a kindly frau who brings them a bottle of wine from the cellar. At this point the airaid is only glimpsed through the window. At an earlier point in the leave the couple dine in an unbelievably stylish restaurant, although here at least Sirk has the honesty to interrupt the proceedings with a pretty devastating direct hit which leaves one diner running is a sea of flames. If I have reservations about some of the romantic trappings of the scenes in Germany, I have none about the intense realism of the scenes on the eastern front. Would that the film was all on this level.

Re: Shannon Box's (sbox@gvtc.com) observation: "In short, this is an important film of significant value. Not because it is about history, but because it is about the redeeming quality of humanity, even if displayed in the setting of our onetime enemy." I would change the last of Shannon's statement to BECAUSE it is displayed in the setting of our onetime enemy. I saw this film shortly after it was released, in a theater on a USArmy post in Munich, Germany (McGraw Kaserne). At that time I was a student, especially of German history. This film provided an opportunity to be transported, for a few hours, into that closed society that our German friends had lived through but could not adequately convey to us. For those who enjoyed this film I would recommend reading "The Officer Factory" by Hans Helmut Kirst and Betrayed Skies (I have forgotten the author, but that is a first rate but largely unknown German pilot's story of his unwilling part in the air war). In short, this is a modern day All Quiet on the Western Front.

I saw this fabulous tear-jerker purely by accident but I don't regret it one bit. In my opinion it's one of the best romantic war films ever made. This is mainly because the fabulous director Douglas Sirk doesn't allow it to become a soppy schmaltz. Also, the film is incredibly moving, especially in a scene at the beginning where a young man, unable to live with the guilt of having shot a woman, shoots himself. John Gavin is good as Ernst Graeber and his beloved is adequately played by Liselotte Pulver, but the most outstanding performance, I think, is by Charles Régnier as Joseph. If more war films were made like this then they would be much, much more watchable. The credit sequence at the beginning of the film is also very well done. Why don't more people know this masterpiece? Enjoy! (and don't forget the Kleenex) 10/10

I can recommend this war film. Despite distracting weaknesses in production quality, the power of the material carries the viewer along very effectively. The scenario is the dying days of World War II from the perspective of a German soldier. This represents unusual material for Hollywood, and romantic leading man John Gavin is odd casting as the hero. Although his flashes of American pearly whites are incongruous, he and indeed all the actors do quite well in their parts although hampered by the forced pace of the direction and the artificial quality of the sound recording. Clearly overdubbed, the dialogue has the quality of a read- through in an indoor studio, despite most of the action being out-of-doors. The cinematography is quite good and the sets impressive as the soldier Ernst moves from the horrors of the Russian front to the heavily-bombed hometown where he returns on leave. Trying to find what has become of his parents, he receives little sympathy from his countrymen and women, who are deadened (or maddened) by the bombardment from the skies they are experiencing. Officialdom is represented by a range of repulsive types, underlining the moral ambiguity the hero is struggling with after his experiences on the front. Where in all this horror is anything worth living for? The answer comes in his developing relationship with the winsome Elizabeth, portrayed by a delightful actress whose name is not familiar to me. What hopes of happiness in the maelstrom of the times? A poignant moment comes when the couple fantasize where they would like to go for a honeymoon, only to reflect that as Germans they would be hated just about everywhere. I found this a memorable film.