IMDb RATING
2.9/10
1.6K
YOUR RATING
Scientists build a time machine to snatch objects from the past. But little do they know that 20th-century objects put in the machine seem to be "traded" for analogous future objects by inte... Read allScientists build a time machine to snatch objects from the past. But little do they know that 20th-century objects put in the machine seem to be "traded" for analogous future objects by intelligent life.Scientists build a time machine to snatch objects from the past. But little do they know that 20th-century objects put in the machine seem to be "traded" for analogous future objects by intelligent life.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
(FYI, I caught this movie on YouTube.)
The average IMDb ranking is currently 2.5 for this movie, which is twice as low as it ought to be. This is not a great movie, it's not even a particularly good movie, but it is not in the same abysmal league as truly bad grades Z 1950s scifi.
Other reviews have noted some of the cool moments in the movie, such as the woman from the future at first speaking Greek, not knowing exactly what language is being spoken in the time frame to wish she has returned from the year 5000. There are a few other such moments, which exhibit more cleverness than the scripts from a good many other super low-budget movies of the era.
That's not to say the script is good. It's too talky, and there are long moments of melodrama which in the hands of a decent script writer could have been replaced by moments of Science Fiction plot and dialogue instead (without adding a dime to the budget). The acting is better than in many similarly low-budget movies, but it's still not good. The one exception is Joyce Holden, who has talent, and mostly succeeds in imbuing her lines with personality.
I myself don't find this movie worthy of repeated viewing, but for genuine fans of 1950s science fiction it is worth a look.
The average IMDb ranking is currently 2.5 for this movie, which is twice as low as it ought to be. This is not a great movie, it's not even a particularly good movie, but it is not in the same abysmal league as truly bad grades Z 1950s scifi.
Other reviews have noted some of the cool moments in the movie, such as the woman from the future at first speaking Greek, not knowing exactly what language is being spoken in the time frame to wish she has returned from the year 5000. There are a few other such moments, which exhibit more cleverness than the scripts from a good many other super low-budget movies of the era.
That's not to say the script is good. It's too talky, and there are long moments of melodrama which in the hands of a decent script writer could have been replaced by moments of Science Fiction plot and dialogue instead (without adding a dime to the budget). The acting is better than in many similarly low-budget movies, but it's still not good. The one exception is Joyce Holden, who has talent, and mostly succeeds in imbuing her lines with personality.
I myself don't find this movie worthy of repeated viewing, but for genuine fans of 1950s science fiction it is worth a look.
Really pretty ridiculous and that's difficult for me to say because Iove 1950's early 60's Sci Fi but, OK, it's pretty bad unless you think about it as a comedy.
The acting is mediocre. The effects are really cheesy and the story, which could have been interesting, is really missing substance, clarity and moves very slowly. The blonde lead actress is tolerable but it really is lacking so many good characteristics of any good Sci Fi movie. Very disappointing. Especially "the Terror".
The acting is mediocre. The effects are really cheesy and the story, which could have been interesting, is really missing substance, clarity and moves very slowly. The blonde lead actress is tolerable but it really is lacking so many good characteristics of any good Sci Fi movie. Very disappointing. Especially "the Terror".
TERROR FROM THE YEAR 5000 (1958) was one of innumerable American International horror/sci-fi movies that flooded local TV stations in the early 1960s. I first saw it in 1961 when I was 9 years and unlike other AIP favorites such as THE AMAZING COLOSSAL MAN, THE SCREAMING SKULL, and EARTH-vs-THE SPIDER, it disappeared from the airwaves but there were parts of it I never forgot. I later found out that TERROR was one of a handful of AIP titles that were withdrawn from circulation.
I didn't see TERROR again until recently when I caught it on YouTube. This time around it made a different impression on me. Turns out that what I didn't remember was worth forgetting. The movie has lower than usual production values, cheap special effects, and performances that are singularly one note. The one exception is Salome Jens who plays the title character, a woman from the future mutated by radioactivity from atomic wars which took place after 1958. Unfortunately she's only in the film for the last 20 of its 66 minute running time.
While TERROR FROM THE YEAR 5000 is not a good movie, I do give it points for trying something different with the time travel twist. I'm glad I saw it again although I'm in no rush to repeat the experience. Salome Jens went on to a busy career on stage and TV as well as acting in a few movies. The same cannot be said for the others. The worst performance of the film can be awarded to the archaeologist's secretary which really must be heard to be believed. To be fair, according to imdb, she was the production supervisor and had to fill in at the last minute for an actress who quit.
Although interiors were shot at Poverty Row studio ZIV who produced TV shows in the 1950s like THE CISCO KID and SEA HUNT, several location shots were done in Dade County Florida. On the "you've got to start somewhere" front, Dede Allen, the film's editor, would go on to such major movies as THE HUSTLER, BONNIE & CLYDE, & DOG DAY AFTERNOON. Also the film has a great poster that promises far more than it delivers...For more reviews visit The Capsule Critic.
I didn't see TERROR again until recently when I caught it on YouTube. This time around it made a different impression on me. Turns out that what I didn't remember was worth forgetting. The movie has lower than usual production values, cheap special effects, and performances that are singularly one note. The one exception is Salome Jens who plays the title character, a woman from the future mutated by radioactivity from atomic wars which took place after 1958. Unfortunately she's only in the film for the last 20 of its 66 minute running time.
While TERROR FROM THE YEAR 5000 is not a good movie, I do give it points for trying something different with the time travel twist. I'm glad I saw it again although I'm in no rush to repeat the experience. Salome Jens went on to a busy career on stage and TV as well as acting in a few movies. The same cannot be said for the others. The worst performance of the film can be awarded to the archaeologist's secretary which really must be heard to be believed. To be fair, according to imdb, she was the production supervisor and had to fill in at the last minute for an actress who quit.
Although interiors were shot at Poverty Row studio ZIV who produced TV shows in the 1950s like THE CISCO KID and SEA HUNT, several location shots were done in Dade County Florida. On the "you've got to start somewhere" front, Dede Allen, the film's editor, would go on to such major movies as THE HUSTLER, BONNIE & CLYDE, & DOG DAY AFTERNOON. Also the film has a great poster that promises far more than it delivers...For more reviews visit The Capsule Critic.
In TERROR IN THE YEAR 5000, scientists somehow bring an artifact from the far-flung future into the present. NYC museum curator, Dr. Hedges (Ward Costello) heads for Florida to investigate this anomaly.
Untold horror ensues.
Another of the very talky sci-fi movies of its era, the action level is extremely low. Any real interest comes from the jealous tension between the head scientist's daughter (Joyce Holden), her dad's assistant, Dr. Hedges, and Angelo the caretaker, who happens to have the world's most interesting eyebrows. This soap opera is interrupted only sporadically, up until the "big finale".
Salome Jens plays the visitor from the future who runs around causing havoc. Her shimmery outfit and fingernails, along with her "transformation" scene are semi-interesting. The rest is a bit of a slog to wade through.
POINT OF INTEREST: There's a scene where the characters go to the movies, and the posters of I WAS A TEENAGE FRANKENSTEIN are on display outside the theater. Any collectors will drool over these vintage images!...
Untold horror ensues.
Another of the very talky sci-fi movies of its era, the action level is extremely low. Any real interest comes from the jealous tension between the head scientist's daughter (Joyce Holden), her dad's assistant, Dr. Hedges, and Angelo the caretaker, who happens to have the world's most interesting eyebrows. This soap opera is interrupted only sporadically, up until the "big finale".
Salome Jens plays the visitor from the future who runs around causing havoc. Her shimmery outfit and fingernails, along with her "transformation" scene are semi-interesting. The rest is a bit of a slog to wade through.
POINT OF INTEREST: There's a scene where the characters go to the movies, and the posters of I WAS A TEENAGE FRANKENSTEIN are on display outside the theater. Any collectors will drool over these vintage images!...
As a child I fell in love with 'monster' movies immediately upon seeing my first (Frankenstein Meets The Wolfman) on television. Fortunately for me I grew up in the fifties, an era prolific with cheapie horror and sci-fi films. A neighborhood theatre ran them almost exclusively at the time and I attended every Saturday (and sometimes a couple more days per week in glorious summer). Just couldn't get enough of this stuff.
I could take all the giant ants, scorpions and spiders, all the ghosts and haunted houses, the numerous editions of frankenstein monsters and invaders from space pretty well. For some reason, though, nothing frightened me more or stayed with me longer than the rare feminine monsters. Perhaps it was because women were always the loving caregivers (Mom, Grandma, my teachers, my sisters). When sick, or waking from a nightmare we always call for Mom. So, I think the idea of a woman being a vicious, scary thing was such a perversion of all I otherwise knew, the effect on me was especially chilling. I had no problem with the mutilated faces of men as in 'Horrors Of The Black Museum', 'The Black Sleep', 'The Unearthly' and so forth. But the visages of the female victims in 'The Hypnotic Eye' and of the niece in 'Frankenstein's Daughter' always made me squeeze shut my eyes.
'The Astounding She Monster' is a prime example of these fears - a malevolent, radioactive female relentlessly stalking me, her touch meaning sure pain and death. From the age of seven until seventeen, that particular luminescent character showed up in my nightmares. But the single most frightening thing I ever saw was the female terror that came shrieking out of the time machine in this movie, arms pumping in a marching style, coming right at me. Peeling off another woman's face to wear as a mask was incredibly disturbing. Yep - this was the single-most terror of my childhood movie-viewing. I couldn't even bring myself to keep my eyes open for more than half a second when the movie closes with a close-up of this hideously deformed feminist with a wicked widow's peak. Even at the age of sixteen, surrounded by buddies watching it on the late show, my body kept freezing with fear, though I didn't mention it to them.
Going by most of the reviews here, today's audiences, accustomed to the most graphic horror, just find this monster boring. But I'm still scared of this terror from the year 5000. Oh yeah, and the four-eyed cat gave me the creeps pretty good too.
I could take all the giant ants, scorpions and spiders, all the ghosts and haunted houses, the numerous editions of frankenstein monsters and invaders from space pretty well. For some reason, though, nothing frightened me more or stayed with me longer than the rare feminine monsters. Perhaps it was because women were always the loving caregivers (Mom, Grandma, my teachers, my sisters). When sick, or waking from a nightmare we always call for Mom. So, I think the idea of a woman being a vicious, scary thing was such a perversion of all I otherwise knew, the effect on me was especially chilling. I had no problem with the mutilated faces of men as in 'Horrors Of The Black Museum', 'The Black Sleep', 'The Unearthly' and so forth. But the visages of the female victims in 'The Hypnotic Eye' and of the niece in 'Frankenstein's Daughter' always made me squeeze shut my eyes.
'The Astounding She Monster' is a prime example of these fears - a malevolent, radioactive female relentlessly stalking me, her touch meaning sure pain and death. From the age of seven until seventeen, that particular luminescent character showed up in my nightmares. But the single most frightening thing I ever saw was the female terror that came shrieking out of the time machine in this movie, arms pumping in a marching style, coming right at me. Peeling off another woman's face to wear as a mask was incredibly disturbing. Yep - this was the single-most terror of my childhood movie-viewing. I couldn't even bring myself to keep my eyes open for more than half a second when the movie closes with a close-up of this hideously deformed feminist with a wicked widow's peak. Even at the age of sixteen, surrounded by buddies watching it on the late show, my body kept freezing with fear, though I didn't mention it to them.
Going by most of the reviews here, today's audiences, accustomed to the most graphic horror, just find this monster boring. But I'm still scared of this terror from the year 5000. Oh yeah, and the four-eyed cat gave me the creeps pretty good too.
Did you know
- TriviaThis bears one of the earliest film editing credits for Dede Allen, who went on to a career editing such feature films as The Hustler, Bonnie and Clyde, Dog Day Afternoon, and Reds.
- GoofsCarbon 14 testing cannot reveal future dates (a possible alternative would be to show a relatively recent artifact date impossibly old because it came from the future).
- Quotes
Narrator: In the year nineteen hundred and fifty-eight, Man launched the first satellite and pierced the space barrier.
- Alternate versionsWhen originally released theatrically in the UK, the BBFC made cuts to secure a 'X' rating.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Mystery Science Theater 3000: Terror from the Year 5000 (1997)
- How long is Terror from the Year 5000?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Terror from 5000 A.D.
- Filming locations
- American Museum of Natural History - Central Park West at 79th Street, Manhattan, New York City, New York, USA(facade of the Natural History Museum.)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 6m(66 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content