A gun-slinging drifter, armed with a legendary pistol, saves a town from the greedy clutches of an evil family. But what makes him so fast? Is it the man or the gun?A gun-slinging drifter, armed with a legendary pistol, saves a town from the greedy clutches of an evil family. But what makes him so fast? Is it the man or the gun?A gun-slinging drifter, armed with a legendary pistol, saves a town from the greedy clutches of an evil family. But what makes him so fast? Is it the man or the gun?
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Karl 'Killer' Davis
- Swede
- (as Karl Davis)
John Barton
- Townsman
- (uncredited)
Gordon Carveth
- Townsman
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Seems like it should've been made in the late '60s, early '70s. In another country. The laughable dialog, we don't care. How so many people throw their lives away without hesitation, I'm sure it's happened.
I just saw this on cable, and knowing nothing about it before hand, I found myself slowly drawn into the story. I wanted to know what would happen to these characters, and what was really motivating them. I ended up really enjoying it.
All the leads play characters who are intense, and are flawed in various ways. Also, we never get a whole lot of background on the characters, just enough to intrigue me and keep me watching.
At times, I found myself comparing the directorial and writing style to some of the early Dragnet TV episodes from the 1950's. Being black and white, the lighting is subdued, almost flat. The shootings are quick and intense and almost matter of fact.
In conclusion, I really enjoyed it but suspect it is not for everyone.
All the leads play characters who are intense, and are flawed in various ways. Also, we never get a whole lot of background on the characters, just enough to intrigue me and keep me watching.
At times, I found myself comparing the directorial and writing style to some of the early Dragnet TV episodes from the 1950's. Being black and white, the lighting is subdued, almost flat. The shootings are quick and intense and almost matter of fact.
In conclusion, I really enjoyed it but suspect it is not for everyone.
Probably one of the most original ideas for a b-western I have ever come across. Despite having all the other trappings of a b-movie, (the female saloon keeper romantic lead, the bad rich guy and his gang, the philosophical drifter etc) the basic idea, the focus on the gun of a famous (now deceased) killer and whether or not it gives its owner supernatural speed on the draw makes for an unexpected psychological thriller.
Don't misunderstand me, this is not a great movie, its nowhere near as well realised as it should be and a terrific idea is poorly served. Still, if ever a movie deserved to be revisited, this is it. Here's hoping Tarantino or someone comes across it one of these days.
Don't misunderstand me, this is not a great movie, its nowhere near as well realised as it should be and a terrific idea is poorly served. Still, if ever a movie deserved to be revisited, this is it. Here's hoping Tarantino or someone comes across it one of these days.
Man or Gun is an interesting film, which is unusual as most 1950s B Westerns are definitely not very interesting, most being retreads of earlier, better films. However, in this film there is inventive camera work with interesting angles and crane shots, an intelligent plot, a good use of music, sound and silence, and decent acting. It is all the more the unusual as being well directed by a man whose career was comprised of 9 films all directed in a single 5 year period (1956-1961), Albert Gannaway. While not a great film, it is a good one.
The plot involves Fran Dare (Audrey Totter), a saloon owner, and her partner manipulating a fast drawing stranger (Macdonald Carey) with a gun that holds a growing superstitious significance to those around him. He is used to wrest control of the town from the Corleys and to extract some measure of revenge for Fran, whose father had been killed by the Corleys. The town's aged sherriff spends his time in his office, playing checkers, trying to avoid trouble, and swearing that since he had been in office there had been "no killings, only legal shootouts".
Both Audrey Totter and Macdonald Carey had long careers, both appearing in over 50 films and in various televisions series.
The film has more the feel of the great physcological westerns of the 1950s than your standard Randolph Scott oater.
The final 20 minutes of the movie include an inventive gunfight at a farmhouse and a well done climax.
The plot involves Fran Dare (Audrey Totter), a saloon owner, and her partner manipulating a fast drawing stranger (Macdonald Carey) with a gun that holds a growing superstitious significance to those around him. He is used to wrest control of the town from the Corleys and to extract some measure of revenge for Fran, whose father had been killed by the Corleys. The town's aged sherriff spends his time in his office, playing checkers, trying to avoid trouble, and swearing that since he had been in office there had been "no killings, only legal shootouts".
Both Audrey Totter and Macdonald Carey had long careers, both appearing in over 50 films and in various televisions series.
The film has more the feel of the great physcological westerns of the 1950s than your standard Randolph Scott oater.
The final 20 minutes of the movie include an inventive gunfight at a farmhouse and a well done climax.
I did not find this western that strange, I prefered TERROR IN A TEXAS TOWN, for instance, also a weird western with a very unusual and surprising ending too. But yes, this western is above average compared to many other ones speaking of similar plot. Thanks probably to the directing, camera work, atmosphere. Madonald Carey is as bland as ever but good enough to keep your attention till the end. Concerning Audrey Totter, she doesn't seem to be that concerned in her role. To briefly summarize, this western is worth watching in the grade B category, because it has the quality of a good really B movie. I would not be surprised that this plot had inspired the late nineties series THE GUN, about a gun seeked by many people.
Did you know
- TriviaThe gun in question in this movie is repeatedly called a "Colt Wesson .44". There are Colt guns and Smith & Wesson guns but there is no such thing as a Colt Wesson.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Shadows (1958)
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 19m(79 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content