L'expédition du Kon-Tiki

I did not know that expedition until I saw the "Kon-Tiki" movie of 2012 and then I discovered an watched the documentary of "Kon-Tiki" and I think that documentary is better than the movie. In this documentary we can watch and observe how this crew survived all that time and how they spent their time.

"Kon-Tiki" is a documentary that shows us how Thor Heyerdahl proved that was possible South Americans to settle in Polynesia before Columbus did that. In these 80 minutes of the life of these crew we can watch how difficult task they had and what feelings Thor Heyerdahl had in all of that journey.

Finally I want to say that I liked very much this documentary because it was different from all the other documentaries which I have seen, not only because of its age, but for how realistic it was.

I got a copy of the book, "Kon-Tiki" when I was ten years old (1962). I still remember the story. I didn't know abut this film until now. It's an amazing story of how a man's belief and conviction can truly change how we think of the world around us. If you like this film you must also read the book.

The movie was fascinating as was Heyerdahl's book. The problem is the "extra" material - an interview with Thor Heyerdahl and extra film clips of the Ra I, RaII and Tigris expeditions. Any first year film student could have done better. There were almost no captions or identifiers, the interview was chopped up and interspersed with clips with no explanation or relevance. The whole looked like a hasty mishmash that should never have been released. The extra color footage was fine. The extra on the "crew" could have benefited from a bit more than the name. As Heyerdahl died in 2002, that would also have been useful information. The photos -- with captions from the book -- were fine, if only the "interview" extra had been done half as well.

When I was a youth I was interested in anthropology and exploring. The searching and thrill of tracing in the footsteps of explorers was exciting. I read books about such adventures and searches for lost civilizations. In the mid-1950s, I read Thor Heyerdahl's "Kon-Tiki: Across the Pacific in a Raft." It was a gripping tale of a real-life adventure.

With Kon-Tiki, Thor Heyerdahl did something that no one else had ever done. That is, that no one had done before in recorded history. But he thought it was not only possible but probable. Having researched and studied civilizations in South America and the Polynesian Islands, Heyerdahl found some striking similarities. He conjectured that some of the South Pacific islands may have been settled by people who sailed there from Peru. So, in 1947, he set out with five companions to prove that such a sea voyage would have been possible 1,500 years ago.

The Kon-Tiki expedition built a raft out of huge balsa logs and native plants that they cut and gathered themselves in South America. On April 28, their voyage began, and 101 days later they landed on a small island of the Tuamotus in French Polynesia. They had sailed and drifted 5,000 miles (4,300 nautical miles) across the Pacific Ocean. They proved that it could be done. Most of the later research and studies have established a strong link of the South Pacific Islands with migrations from Asia. But there still remains the possibility that some people may have crossed the ocean from South America.

In 1955, when I read Heyerdahl's 1948 book about the adventure, I didn't know that this 1950 movie had been made about the voyage. Let's face it - documentary films have never been big draws or appealed to widespread audiences. It had very limited release in the U. S. but was highly popular in Norway and the rest of Europe And, 1950 was before videos or DVDs were available that the public could buy. The film won a 1951 Oscar for documentary in 1952, but the Oscar shows only cover the main Oscar winners for feature films. Years later I came across this film and just watched it again recently.

The wonder of this film is that it is actual film footage that Heyerdahl and company shot on the expedition. There's no doctoring, no Hollywood glamorizing, no fiction or spin in this film. It's a 77-minute narrated story with actual film footage of the expedition. Heyerdahl himself narrates the film - in both the Scandinavian and English versions that were filmed simultaneously. He gives a very brief background leading up to the plans for the expedition. Then the film shows some of the team's actual logging of large balsa trees for the raft. It shows the men working on and building the raft in the port of Callao, Peru. The bulk of the film time is given to the actual voyage.

A 2012 European feature film was made on the Kon-Tiki expedition - after all the members had died. It deviated some from the factual details but generally told the story of the venture. And the filming of the ocean scenes near Malta gave an authentic look to the film. But, the greater emphasis on the struggles, inclement weather, dangers and drama are clear for greater interest and appeal. The one benefit of the later feature film was its information about the individual members of the crew. The documentary didn't spend time giving the backgrounds or information about the crew. All of that had been well covered in the news media and press leading up to the 1947 venture.

I found some of the information Heyerdahl gave in his narrating the film to be very interesting. For instance, he said that they never sighted a single ship during their entire voyage. I'm not familiar with commercial shipping lanes or ocean fishing grounds. And, the Pacific Ocean covers the largest area of any body of water or land mass on the face of the earth. But they had almost constant clear weather. With thousands of ships plying the earth's oceans, the height of ships above the water, and a visibility of a hundred miles or more, it's a wonder that they never so much as spotted a ship on the distant horizon.

Heyerdahl says, ""The experts had been quite wrong when they maintained that the ropes of the balsa raft would be chafed right through. The ropes, being harder than balsa, would dig deeper and deeper into the logs until they were completely protected in deep grooves."

Their average daily speed was 42.5 miles, and their longest 24-hour period covered about 80 miles. They were constantly followed by sharks. They caught and ate sharks and other fish - their favorite being the dolphin fish. Every morning they would collect the flying fish that were on the deck and eat them for breakfast. They used cuttle fish for ink. They were never attacked by sharks or whales. The current and Tradewinds carried them constantly Westward. These were so strong, that they had to tether their small dingy to the raft when one or two men got in it to film the raft at sea. The first time they sighted land, they tried to steer toward it but to no avail. At one point, Heyerdahl says, "We had drifted automatically a fifth of the way around the globe in a Westerly direction; but working our way a mere 200 yards in the opposite direction proved impossible."

This is an interesting film of a real event that people of all ages and time should enjoy. Especially those who enjoy adventure and exploring.

I have watched this film twice now and think its quite good for the limited equipment used to create this film. (filmed in 1947) Dr. Heyerdahl explains his theory about the migration of south American Pre-Colubian Indians to the Polynesia's islands by way raft fell of large balsa trees. This documentary follows Dr. Heyerdahl and crew as they select balsa trees in Equidor and float with them down river to the pacific for assembly in Peru. They launch off on a 101 day sea adventure testing the strength of their primitive raft surviving only by means available to natives of that era. See for yourself, a real adventure!