IMDb RATING
5.1/10
210
YOUR RATING
A young actress must decide which of two lovers will be her husband. She daydreams about each one to help her decide.A young actress must decide which of two lovers will be her husband. She daydreams about each one to help her decide.A young actress must decide which of two lovers will be her husband. She daydreams about each one to help her decide.
George Benson
- Theatre Royal manager
- (uncredited)
Ernest Blyth
- Romano's Patron
- (uncredited)
Stephen Boyd
- Beaumont's Poolside Companion
- (uncredited)
Sean Connery
- Extra in crowd scene
- (uncredited)
Victor Harrington
- Romano's Patron
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
A ambitious colour production that represents the first of two ill-fated attempts by Herbert Wilcox to create a romantic team out of Anna Neagle and Errol Flynn.
As in the earlier 'Elizabeth of Ladymead', the plot hinges on that phenomenon beloved of fantasy writers whereby a blow on the head (SLIGHT SPOILER COMING:) transports the sufferer to an earlier era; which on this occasion gives Mrs Wilcox an opportunity to recreate her earlier role as Nell Gwyn.
As in the earlier 'Elizabeth of Ladymead', the plot hinges on that phenomenon beloved of fantasy writers whereby a blow on the head (SLIGHT SPOILER COMING:) transports the sufferer to an earlier era; which on this occasion gives Mrs Wilcox an opportunity to recreate her earlier role as Nell Gwyn.
"Lilacs in the Spring" is a very confusing and, in my opinion, ill-conceived film. There's plenty of stuff to like in the movie (such as seeing Errol Flynn dance for, I think, the second time in a movie)....but the sum total just didn't work for me.
The film begins during the later portion of the Blitz in London...1944. The story follows Carole Beaumont (Anna Naegel) through a story and multiple flashback scenes. After getting bumped around by a bomb explosion, Carole believes she's back in the time of Charles II of Britain. The man playing Charles in this flashback is her boyfriend, Charles. Later, she has another flashback during which she's Queen Victoria hanging out with her husband, Albert....who is played by another one of Carole's boyfriends. Later, there is a LONG flashback, though from whose viewpoint, I have no idea! You see Carole's parents dating (played by Flynn and Naegle) which is confusing, as Flynn plays both father AND lover to two different characters played by Naegle (the mother and then daughter)! It's a bit creepy...and confusing...and it doesn't fit in at all with the previous two flashbacks. In fact, this flashback really is like a whole separate movie!
The bottom line is that the script just seemed like a mess. The singing, dancing and story (at times) were nice but the whole package was just strange and confusing...like it needed a revision to the script. It also would have helped to have two different actresses play Carole and her mother. A misfire.
The film begins during the later portion of the Blitz in London...1944. The story follows Carole Beaumont (Anna Naegel) through a story and multiple flashback scenes. After getting bumped around by a bomb explosion, Carole believes she's back in the time of Charles II of Britain. The man playing Charles in this flashback is her boyfriend, Charles. Later, she has another flashback during which she's Queen Victoria hanging out with her husband, Albert....who is played by another one of Carole's boyfriends. Later, there is a LONG flashback, though from whose viewpoint, I have no idea! You see Carole's parents dating (played by Flynn and Naegle) which is confusing, as Flynn plays both father AND lover to two different characters played by Naegle (the mother and then daughter)! It's a bit creepy...and confusing...and it doesn't fit in at all with the previous two flashbacks. In fact, this flashback really is like a whole separate movie!
The bottom line is that the script just seemed like a mess. The singing, dancing and story (at times) were nice but the whole package was just strange and confusing...like it needed a revision to the script. It also would have helped to have two different actresses play Carole and her mother. A misfire.
I was too young to be an Anna Neagle fan, but after seeing her in ' Lilacs in the Spring ' I can well understand that she had a number one following in the UK for many decades. She danced superbly, and her flirtatious charm showed how elegant and sophisticated she was on stage and screen. Her films are rarely shown, and despite her reputation she has fallen into that eclipse called time. We live in another world now, far away from her death in 1986. As for this film, found second hand on DVD I will treasure it if alone for the ' Lilacs in the Spring ' song by the great Ivor Novello at the end, where she is dancing and singing to troops in Burma towards the end of World War 2. Herbert Wilcox, her husband directed and he was not the best of directors, and sadly she worked with almost only him on film. And yet her presence surmounts any doubts about her own greatness. Now the plot. Suffering from concussion after a Blitz attack she dreams of other times, and again takes on her former roles as Queen Victoria and Nell Gwynne. Her mother another actor is played by herself and a feat in itself. She is loved by an actor played by Erroll Flynn. The chemistry between them works well, and I gladly give this film a 9. A past age, and one we risk forgetting. If the plot seems complicated it isn't. I recommend a UK television showing of many of her films.
Late Flynn, when he took almost any work he could get to pay off alimony. He turns in a sincere, believable performance, occasionally lampooning himself, and does a creditable song and dance number. Other points of interest include Peter Graves as Prince Albert (if you didn't know, you'd never guess) and Sean Connery is supposedly in there somewhere as an extra, but I haven't found him.
Most of the reviews imply that Errol Flynn carries "Lilacs In The Spring".Not so.The film belongs to the one and only Dame Anna Neagle.Her's is a tour de force performance and her age(around fifty at the time) in no way detracts from her convincing,multi-layered portrayal of the daughter-mother-daughter characters.This lady is pure class and with her peaches and cream complexion,gracious presence and incredible versatility,she is a delight in every scene.The somewhat confusing plot has been expertly explained by the other reviewers (thank you) and like them,I have only been able to acquire a murky,poor quality video print.I remember seeing it the cinema in 1956 and it was magic all the way. Looking at the film now,I'm astounded at Anna Neagle's dancing skills.Whether dancing the tango,waltz or,best of all,her 1920's 'Dance Little Lady' number,she's enchantment all the way.Arguably a better dancer than a singer,she nevertheless delivers two lovely renditions of 'We'll Gather Lilacs' and she's ravishing dancing to the orchestral version. Errol Flynn fans may only show interest in his contribution but by the time he appeared in this film he was clearly past his prime (the kindest thing I can say).Fortunately,he had the amazing Anna Neagle to prop him up in all their scenes together.Bravo,Dame Anna!
Did you know
- TriviaIn the modern sequences, Anna Neagle, age fifty, played the daughter of Errol Flynn, age forty-five.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Frances Farmer Presents: Let's Make Up (1958)
- SoundtracksKeep the Home Fires Burning (Till the Boys Come Home)
Written by Ivor Novello
- How long is Let's Make Up?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Le Printemps, les Lilas et l'Amour
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 34m(94 min)
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content