King's Rhapsody

Having just watched King's Rhapsody and having waited many years to find a copy, I am sorry to say that it just doesn't work. Flynn is just not there! He seems to have wandered in and just been allowed to continue the role without any real sense of comedy or emotion. The rest of the cast work hard but the fact that the King has no singing voice whatsoever spoils the whole idea of the operetta and an ever convenient band of street singers doing his work just doesn't cut the ice.

I feel certain that Mr Novello would NOT have been happy with his movie despite it's lush and colourful settings. I scored it as a three out of ten and that is because they tried to make a big Hollywood musical and failed miserably. It could be done again but I doubt that it would favour any popularity in today's world and more's the pity.

The first part of the film is of sustained perfection and interest and adorably beautiful in every detail, especially the costumes, the colours, the music and the dances, culminating in the ballet sequence before the wedding. After the wedding the interest drops, as the king gets more melancholy and both his ladies seem to lose interest in him, while he actually never wanted to be king in the first place. Nevertheless, this is a much underrated masterpiece of beauty, unique in its kind, while the film that comes closest to it is Ernst Lubitsch's last film "That Lady in Ermine" seven years earlier. Ivor Novello's music is endearingly delightful all the way and furnishes the film with a golden frame. I couldn't help loving it, in spite of its flaws, its slow tempo, its tedious moments and Errol Flynn's rather disinterested acting, although he is excellent as usual. Both the ladies are adorale, but I think the prize goes to Martita Hunt as the Queen Mother, who always makes a lasting impression.

This was the second of the Herbert Wilcox features Flynn did with Wilcox's wife, Dame Anna Neagle, in the wake of the William tell disaster. He needed a paycheck and got two of them. As with virtually all of Flynn's perpetually dismissed 1950's films, it is an 'A' level film with a good cast and production values. The problem is, it's also very old-fashioned, a 'Ruritanian romance" complete with some unmemorable songs sung in an operatic fashion, (Maria Callas had nothing to worry about here.) The best musical number, a dream sequence involving Wymore, seems to have been inspired by Oklahoma's "Out of MY Dreams", which is far better.

The film features not only Wilcox's wife but also Flynn's Patrice Wymore, not long before their marriage came apart. Errol plays the crown prince of 'Laurentia' who has never gotten along with his parents or their ministers and has been living in Monte Carlo with Nagle, "the woman he loves". Flynn's Prince Richard is a combination of England's Edward VIII, Austria's Crown Prince Rudolph, (of Mayerling fame) and Egypt's King Farouk, whom Flynn new well. It's also the first film playing a character who drinks a lot. In some scenes he's kind of like the silly character he portrayed in his TV appearances of the time, (see What's My Line, the Steve Allen Show and others). Wymore once said of Flynn: "I found generally that when he was at his lowest ebb or most frightened, he would appear to be at his gayest. I had to know him quite some time before I was able to recognize his low ebbs". Prince, then King Richard has a similar trait: he gets silly when being informed that the King is dead and he must come back to assume that role and when he meets the bride that has been arranged for him. But he can also be quite serious, fall legitimate in love and hate and also be idealistic to battle his father's ministers, (and his mother) to make reforms in the Kingdom.

Unfortunately he loses that political battle and is forced to abdicate when those ministers foment a popular movement against him based on his previous misbehavior as a playboy prince. Neagle plays his long-time love who decides she ahs to give him up so he can attend his responsibilities are King, husband and father. Wymore is the arranged bride who comes to love him, (but was moving in the other direction in real life). This was the second time Flynn had witnessed the coronation of a child king in a film: the first was 1937's 'The Prince and the Pauper'.

It's not all that bad a film and would be better without the musical numbers. Flynn's mercurial performance is the best thing in it. Unlike the first Wilcox film, it was not successful the box office. Flynn's career was slipping but he was still a star and a comeback was just around the corner.

Ivor Novello's late stage success gets a sumptuous and reasonably faithful filming with this large Herbert Wilcox production, designed to showcase his muse, Anna Neagle. It's probably the last big British film operetta--miscast, and a muddled story, but there are all those pretty Novello melodies and some gorgeous wide-screen location filming, and a lot of haute couture flitting around on screen from Ms. Neagle and Patrice Wymore. They're both in love with Errol Flynn, who's a little old and dissipated to be playing the dashing young playboy prince about to be crowned king of the fictional nation of Laurentia. Neagle's his longtime mistress and Wymore the princess ordered to marry him, which she doesn't mind at all. It's annoying that Flynn is allowed to love two women simultaneously without penalty, and the talk is generally dull, and the supporting cast--Martita Hunt as Flynn's queen mum, Miles Malleson as a servant--not very exciting. The editing is atrocious, careening from dialog to irrelevant song to dream ballet and back again. Watching it is like watching the operetta genre age before your very eyes, but if you like this sort of thing, and I do, you'll have a good time. And even if you don't, you'll appreciate the Cinemascope vistas.

This is the first time I've seen or heard of this movie. I'm just tuned into the middle of the film. It's less of a drama and really more of a musical in a mildly romantic sense. The scenery is sumptuous with an atmosphere of high fashion, moreso since the setting involves royalty, i.e. Errol Flynn is to become king so it's lavish in every way. Anna Neagle sings well; I'd never heard her sing before (at least I hope it is her own voice). It is regrettable that Flynn only had a few more years left in his brief life, brief by our standards today. It's refreshing to see a film I haven't seen before. If you like pleasant songs, gentle romance and pageantry, this is one you ought to see when you can. It's almost like a European Broadway musical!