Spain, 1939. On the day the Civil War ends, five comrade soldiers from the Nationalist side have a photograph taken of themselves together and promise to meet ten years later at the same pla... Read allSpain, 1939. On the day the Civil War ends, five comrade soldiers from the Nationalist side have a photograph taken of themselves together and promise to meet ten years later at the same place in Madrid.Spain, 1939. On the day the Civil War ends, five comrade soldiers from the Nationalist side have a photograph taken of themselves together and promise to meet ten years later at the same place in Madrid.
- Awards
- 3 wins & 1 nomination total
Photos
José María Rodero
- Vicente
- (as José Mª Rodero)
Fernando Delgado
- Capitán Silvio
- (as Fernando M. Delgado)
Featured reviews
Spain, 1939 . On the day the Civil War ends , five comrade soldiers who sacrificed themselves (Conrado San Martín as Enrique , José María Rodero as Vicente , Antonio Almorós as Paulino and Julio Peña) during the Spanish Civil War from the National side , all of them have just joined to take on unfortunate circumstances and make themselves a shot together and promise to meet ten years later at the same place in Madrid . Meanwhile , the two friends Enrique and Vicente fall for the same woman (Marisa De Leza) . On June 41 , Hitler invaded Russia and Moscow is besieged , then they draft as volunteers to fight against the communists . The Blue División , officially designated as División Española de Voluntarios by the Spanish Army . Infanterie-Division in the German Army was a unit of Spanish volunteers and conscripts that served in the German Army on the Eastern Front of the Second World War . It also included 1.000 men of the Portuguese Legion send by the Portuguese Estado Novo under the Spanish Flag , many of them had already fought in the Viriatos during the Spanish Civil War . The Blue Division were the only component of the German Army to be awarded a medal of their own, commissioned by Hitler after the effectiveness it had impeding the advance of the Red Army. The casualties of the Blue Division and its successors included 4,954 men killed and 8,700 wounded . Another 372 members of the Blue Division, the Blue Legion, or volunteers were taken prisoner by the victorious Red Army; 286 of these men were kept in captivity until 1954, when they returned to Spain aboard the ship Semiramis, supplied by the International Red Cross .
Acceptable picture deals with the peculiar relationships among members of a patrol , developing the course of their lives and their stay on the Russian steppes battling the Stalin troops . Along with sensitive love story in which two soldiers fall in love for a beautiful woman , though it has a lot of flaws and gaps . It is an interesting film about the Spanish Civil War and División Azul , being full of jingoist fanfare , drama , nostalgia , good feeling , touching images as well as sad scenes , including war stock footage , along with images showing deaths , scarcity , famine and penury . It is a simple , dramatic and thought-provoking portrait of a time when the Spanish had to go Russia in order to fight communism . Highlights of the movie are some battle scenes and the impressive images when a tank runs over a cemetery filled with crosses and hulks . This issue about Spanish volunteers in División Azul and imprisonment in concentration camps has been regarded in other films as ¨Embajadores En El Infierno¨ by Jose Maria Forque , ¨La Espera¨ by Vicente Lluch and ¨Ispansi¨ by Carlos Iglesias . Well played by Conrado San Martin who was considered to be one of the greatest stars of the 40s and 50s interpreting some hits . And great support cast as the prestigious stage actor José Maria Rodero , his wife Elvira Quintillá , Antonio Almorós, Germán Cobos , Fernando Delgado , Adriano Domínguez , Tomás Blanco , Julio Riscal , Aníbal Vela , Beni Deus , and two young players : Vicente Parra and Arturo Fernández.
Atmosperic soundtrack by Mtro. Fernando García Morcillo with Spanish civil war songs performed by the chorus of the Academy Nacional de Mandos and Intructores Jose Antonio , and adding Aragon Jotas and other popular songs as ¨Lili Marlen¨. It packs an atmospheric cinematography by Manuel Berenguer , a perfect remastering being extremely necessary , that's why the film copy is washed-out. This is a fiction movie , written by José María Sánchez Silva and Rafael García Serrano , adding some stock-footage , made in old style , boasting the Spanish past grandeur , being professionally directed by Pedro Lazaga , though it has some ups and downs . Pedro Lazaga was born on October 3, 1918 in Valls, Tarragona, Catalonia , and deceased in 1979 . He was a director and writer, known for Los Chicos Del Preu (1967), and his notorious films about Spanish Civil war and Francoist period as Cuerda De Presos (1956) , El Frente Infinito , La Fiel Infantería and Posición Avanzada (1966). Being specially known for his comedies as Abuelo Made in Spain , Las Secretarias , Abominable Hombre De Costa Del Sol , La Pandilla De Los Once , Trampa Para Catalina , Martes Y Trece , Trio De Damas and many others .
Acceptable picture deals with the peculiar relationships among members of a patrol , developing the course of their lives and their stay on the Russian steppes battling the Stalin troops . Along with sensitive love story in which two soldiers fall in love for a beautiful woman , though it has a lot of flaws and gaps . It is an interesting film about the Spanish Civil War and División Azul , being full of jingoist fanfare , drama , nostalgia , good feeling , touching images as well as sad scenes , including war stock footage , along with images showing deaths , scarcity , famine and penury . It is a simple , dramatic and thought-provoking portrait of a time when the Spanish had to go Russia in order to fight communism . Highlights of the movie are some battle scenes and the impressive images when a tank runs over a cemetery filled with crosses and hulks . This issue about Spanish volunteers in División Azul and imprisonment in concentration camps has been regarded in other films as ¨Embajadores En El Infierno¨ by Jose Maria Forque , ¨La Espera¨ by Vicente Lluch and ¨Ispansi¨ by Carlos Iglesias . Well played by Conrado San Martin who was considered to be one of the greatest stars of the 40s and 50s interpreting some hits . And great support cast as the prestigious stage actor José Maria Rodero , his wife Elvira Quintillá , Antonio Almorós, Germán Cobos , Fernando Delgado , Adriano Domínguez , Tomás Blanco , Julio Riscal , Aníbal Vela , Beni Deus , and two young players : Vicente Parra and Arturo Fernández.
Atmosperic soundtrack by Mtro. Fernando García Morcillo with Spanish civil war songs performed by the chorus of the Academy Nacional de Mandos and Intructores Jose Antonio , and adding Aragon Jotas and other popular songs as ¨Lili Marlen¨. It packs an atmospheric cinematography by Manuel Berenguer , a perfect remastering being extremely necessary , that's why the film copy is washed-out. This is a fiction movie , written by José María Sánchez Silva and Rafael García Serrano , adding some stock-footage , made in old style , boasting the Spanish past grandeur , being professionally directed by Pedro Lazaga , though it has some ups and downs . Pedro Lazaga was born on October 3, 1918 in Valls, Tarragona, Catalonia , and deceased in 1979 . He was a director and writer, known for Los Chicos Del Preu (1967), and his notorious films about Spanish Civil war and Francoist period as Cuerda De Presos (1956) , El Frente Infinito , La Fiel Infantería and Posición Avanzada (1966). Being specially known for his comedies as Abuelo Made in Spain , Las Secretarias , Abominable Hombre De Costa Del Sol , La Pandilla De Los Once , Trampa Para Catalina , Martes Y Trece , Trio De Damas and many others .
Shot in 1954, The Patrol (La patrulla) stands as a revealing expression of Spain's evolving political and cinematic landscape in the early years of the Cold War. Made under the shadow of the Franco regime's tightly controlled cultural apparatus, the film exemplifies the restrained aesthetics and ideological ambiguity characteristic of a specific subset of postwar Spanish cinema. While on the surface it presents a story of hardship and perseverance among a small group of soldiers lost in the desert, its deeper cinematic and political ambitions unfold through its visual language, narrative economy, and subtle ideological coding. The historical moment of its production - just a year after the 1953 Pact of Madrid, which redefined Spain's position within the Western bloc - explains many of the film's nuanced gestures, particularly its understated realignment with American interests and values, even as it remains firmly grounded in a Spanish, and Francoist, narrative of endurance and sacrifice.
Formally, the film leans into a minimalist style that resonates with certain neorealist sensibilities. The desert is not rendered as a battlefield but as an existential space, a vast psychological vacuum in which duty and survival replace action and glory. The black-and-white cinematography is deliberately stark, drawing attention to the oppressive heat and spiritual emptiness of the terrain. Long static shots dominate, and camera movement is used sparingly, always in service of emotional tension rather than kinetic energy. In this stillness, the viewer is invited not into spectacle but into contemplation, a reflection of the soldiers' own slow physical and moral erosion. This choice aligns The Patrol closely with the restrained realism seen in Ambassadors in Hell (Embajadores en el infierno, 1956), although with important tonal and stylistic differences.
Unlike Ambassadors in Hell, which leans toward the exalted and the doctrinal, often through overt religious symbolism and a heightened sense of martyrdom, The Patrol adopts a more neutral, emotionally understated register. Its depiction of suffering is neither romanticized nor explicitly sanctified. Rather than elevating its characters to ideological symbols, the film allows them a greater psychological presence. Each member of the patrol carries his own internal weight, and while individual arcs are never fully developed in a conventional dramatic sense, the film grants them space - through silence, gesture, and physical deterioration - to express something more personal. This approach not only humanizes them but also reflects a quieter, more insidious mode of ideological persuasion: rather than preaching, it suggests. It is precisely in this tonal moderation, this resistance to theatrical extremes, that the film achieves its greatest strength.
The sound design complements this visual austerity. There is a notable absence of score in key moments, amplifying the monotony and tension of the desert ordeal. When music is present, it is functional - used to reinforce themes of duty or solidarity without overwhelming the narrative. The editing, too, avoids dramatization. Transitions are smooth, almost invisible, emphasizing continuity and psychological rhythm over narrative punctuation. This editorial restraint helps maintain the film's tone of quiet endurance, a kind of cinematic mimicry of the soldiers' own resigned persistence.
The film's portrayal of American involvement, while not central, deserves attention. A U. S. military pilot, and particularly the access to American air power, plays a pivotal role in the protagonist's return to Spain. This narrative choice is clearly situated within the broader context of Spain's diplomatic rapprochement with the United States. However, rather than serving as overt propaganda, the film embeds this alliance in the story's resolution without fanfare. The American presence is characterized as efficient, benevolent, and necessary - not heroic, but instrumental. There is no ideological friction, no cultural clash; the American intervention is seamlessly absorbed into the narrative as a stabilizing force. This subtle repositioning reflects Spain's attempt to reframe its international image, portraying its soldiers as worthy of alliance, not isolation. It is a propagandistic gesture, certainly, but executed with narrative discretion and stylistic tact.
The comparison with Ambassadors in Hell becomes even more telling when considering the treatment of collective identity. In both films, the group is central, but The Patrol offers a more subdued, almost fragmented portrait. While Ambassadors in Hell builds toward a climactic affirmation of unity and sacrifice, The Patrol avoids catharsis. Its characters do not find transcendence through suffering; they endure it. Their cohesion is practical, not mystical. This refusal of grand narrative payoff, combined with the film's visual restraint, situates it more firmly within a neorealist lineage - albeit one co-opted for different ideological ends. The film's ambition lies precisely in this ambiguity: it borrows the aesthetics of moral complexity to convey a fundamentally unambiguous message.
Performances throughout are calibrated to match this tone. The cast avoids theatricality, opting instead for subdued expression and physical economy. Emotions are registered through fatigue, glances, pauses - not speeches. In doing so, the film allows its characters to remain grounded, credible, and convincingly human. Their suffering is not symbolic; it is material. This not only enhances the film's dramatic impact but also differentiates it from more didactic contemporaries, lending it a kind of sincerity that transcends its ideological purpose.
The Patrol thus reveals itself as a carefully constructed piece of cinema, shaped as much by its historical moment as by its artistic choices. It remains ideologically loyal to the regime that produced it, but it does so without bombast. Instead, it employs a quiet visual rigor, an understated emotional palette, and a careful narrative symmetry to deliver a message of national dignity, survival, and readiness for reintegration into a newly polarized world order. Its ideological function is real - and clearly felt - but never simplistic. And it is precisely in this restrained approach, in this refusal to indulge in either spectacle or overt moralism, that it finds its distinct voice within the broader canon of Second World War films.
Formally, the film leans into a minimalist style that resonates with certain neorealist sensibilities. The desert is not rendered as a battlefield but as an existential space, a vast psychological vacuum in which duty and survival replace action and glory. The black-and-white cinematography is deliberately stark, drawing attention to the oppressive heat and spiritual emptiness of the terrain. Long static shots dominate, and camera movement is used sparingly, always in service of emotional tension rather than kinetic energy. In this stillness, the viewer is invited not into spectacle but into contemplation, a reflection of the soldiers' own slow physical and moral erosion. This choice aligns The Patrol closely with the restrained realism seen in Ambassadors in Hell (Embajadores en el infierno, 1956), although with important tonal and stylistic differences.
Unlike Ambassadors in Hell, which leans toward the exalted and the doctrinal, often through overt religious symbolism and a heightened sense of martyrdom, The Patrol adopts a more neutral, emotionally understated register. Its depiction of suffering is neither romanticized nor explicitly sanctified. Rather than elevating its characters to ideological symbols, the film allows them a greater psychological presence. Each member of the patrol carries his own internal weight, and while individual arcs are never fully developed in a conventional dramatic sense, the film grants them space - through silence, gesture, and physical deterioration - to express something more personal. This approach not only humanizes them but also reflects a quieter, more insidious mode of ideological persuasion: rather than preaching, it suggests. It is precisely in this tonal moderation, this resistance to theatrical extremes, that the film achieves its greatest strength.
The sound design complements this visual austerity. There is a notable absence of score in key moments, amplifying the monotony and tension of the desert ordeal. When music is present, it is functional - used to reinforce themes of duty or solidarity without overwhelming the narrative. The editing, too, avoids dramatization. Transitions are smooth, almost invisible, emphasizing continuity and psychological rhythm over narrative punctuation. This editorial restraint helps maintain the film's tone of quiet endurance, a kind of cinematic mimicry of the soldiers' own resigned persistence.
The film's portrayal of American involvement, while not central, deserves attention. A U. S. military pilot, and particularly the access to American air power, plays a pivotal role in the protagonist's return to Spain. This narrative choice is clearly situated within the broader context of Spain's diplomatic rapprochement with the United States. However, rather than serving as overt propaganda, the film embeds this alliance in the story's resolution without fanfare. The American presence is characterized as efficient, benevolent, and necessary - not heroic, but instrumental. There is no ideological friction, no cultural clash; the American intervention is seamlessly absorbed into the narrative as a stabilizing force. This subtle repositioning reflects Spain's attempt to reframe its international image, portraying its soldiers as worthy of alliance, not isolation. It is a propagandistic gesture, certainly, but executed with narrative discretion and stylistic tact.
The comparison with Ambassadors in Hell becomes even more telling when considering the treatment of collective identity. In both films, the group is central, but The Patrol offers a more subdued, almost fragmented portrait. While Ambassadors in Hell builds toward a climactic affirmation of unity and sacrifice, The Patrol avoids catharsis. Its characters do not find transcendence through suffering; they endure it. Their cohesion is practical, not mystical. This refusal of grand narrative payoff, combined with the film's visual restraint, situates it more firmly within a neorealist lineage - albeit one co-opted for different ideological ends. The film's ambition lies precisely in this ambiguity: it borrows the aesthetics of moral complexity to convey a fundamentally unambiguous message.
Performances throughout are calibrated to match this tone. The cast avoids theatricality, opting instead for subdued expression and physical economy. Emotions are registered through fatigue, glances, pauses - not speeches. In doing so, the film allows its characters to remain grounded, credible, and convincingly human. Their suffering is not symbolic; it is material. This not only enhances the film's dramatic impact but also differentiates it from more didactic contemporaries, lending it a kind of sincerity that transcends its ideological purpose.
The Patrol thus reveals itself as a carefully constructed piece of cinema, shaped as much by its historical moment as by its artistic choices. It remains ideologically loyal to the regime that produced it, but it does so without bombast. Instead, it employs a quiet visual rigor, an understated emotional palette, and a careful narrative symmetry to deliver a message of national dignity, survival, and readiness for reintegration into a newly polarized world order. Its ideological function is real - and clearly felt - but never simplistic. And it is precisely in this restrained approach, in this refusal to indulge in either spectacle or overt moralism, that it finds its distinct voice within the broader canon of Second World War films.
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 39m(99 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content