Edward Jekyll, ignorant of how his father had brought forth death and destruction with his experiments, is pursuing a chemist career despite the fact that he has been discharged from school ... Read allEdward Jekyll, ignorant of how his father had brought forth death and destruction with his experiments, is pursuing a chemist career despite the fact that he has been discharged from school or his unorthodox experimentations. When the time comes for his father's estate, which had... Read allEdward Jekyll, ignorant of how his father had brought forth death and destruction with his experiments, is pursuing a chemist career despite the fact that he has been discharged from school or his unorthodox experimentations. When the time comes for his father's estate, which had been put in trust, Edward first learns of his father's actions and rather than ignore the... Read all
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Coachman
- (uncredited)
- Tenement Landlord
- (uncredited)
- Woman
- (uncredited)
- Insp. Grey
- (uncredited)
- William Bennett
- (uncredited)
- Hazel Sorelle
- (uncredited)
- Magistrate
- (uncredited)
- Copy Boy
- (uncredited)
- Constable
- (uncredited)
- Man in Bar
- (uncredited)
- Woman in Window
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
* 1/2 (out of 4)
Dr. Jekyll's son (Louis Hayward) goes back to the laboratory to try and prove his father wasn't a monster. This film actually gets off to a pretty good start but things quickly fall apart making this a rather poor film in the end. The performances from everyone in the cast are actually pretty good, which is shocking for this type of film. The first transformation scene is also very well effective but after this there isn't much here. The film seems to think that the viewers didn't want to see a monster but instead sit around and listen to bad dialogue. There's way too much talk going on in this film and this here makes it quite boring.
Louis Hayward plays Edward Jekyll, the son of the late Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde. Most of his time on the screen is spent trying to prove that his father was not the crazed killer, Dr. Hyde, but instead just the brilliant but misunderstood Dr. Jekyll.
This movie was billed as a horror movie, but there is no horror. There are just a few very brief glimpses of the mad Mr. Hyde. This movie had good actors and it could have been so much more had they spent more time with the scary element of the Jekyll and Hyde story. By the end I was just bored with the whole thing.
I thought Edward Ulmer's 1957 movie entitled "The Daughter of Dr. Jekyll", starring Gloria Talbot and John Agar, was a much better film. Even though it was cheesy in parts, it was not boring. This one will put you to sleep.
Did you know
- TriviaWhen Edward is altered by his father's formula, makeup artist Clay Campbell used colored filters to effect the change. He had applied red makeup to Louis Hayward and then passed a two color filter - red and bluish-green - in front of the camera lens. The makeup looked normal under the red filter, but turned dark and scary as the camera shot through the blue-green one. Makeup artist Wally Westmore used the same technique in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931).
- Goofswhen Edward is writing his notes down, he misspells the word nothing twice: spelling it nothnig.
- Quotes
Lottie Sorelle: The pity of it was - she believed in him, right to the end!
Edward Jekyll: Are you sure?
Lottie Sorelle: Why, I was with her that day, when he came in, murder in his heart - like a beast!
- ConnectionsFeatured in TJ and the All Night Theatre: The Son of Dr. Jekyll (1978)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Son of Dr. Jekyll
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 18m(78 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1