A concert pianist unhappily married to a mentally ill woman falls in love with a waitress.A concert pianist unhappily married to a mentally ill woman falls in love with a waitress.A concert pianist unhappily married to a mentally ill woman falls in love with a waitress.
- Won 1 Oscar
- 1 win total
Eddie Acuff
- Second Bus Driver
- (uncredited)
Maude Allen
- Woman
- (uncredited)
Dorothy Appleby
- Waitress
- (uncredited)
Jane Barnes
- Waitress
- (uncredited)
Georgie Billings
- Boy Hiding From Policeman
- (uncredited)
Gladys Blake
- Tenement Resident
- (uncredited)
Stanley Blystone
- First Bus Driver
- (uncredited)
Wade Boteler
- Policeman at Pier
- (uncredited)
Harry C. Bradley
- Reverend Mr. Morris
- (uncredited)
Helen Brown
- Waitress
- (uncredited)
Sonny Bupp
- Boy Hiding from Policeman
- (uncredited)
Featured reviews
I stayed with this hoping for something and it delivered squat. I actually got hooked in the beginning which would have made a very good movie...when Dunne is essential in getting coworkers "the girls" to support a strike against her boss, never seen, of a chain of restaurants. The first part of the film sets up a smart, working women facing the exploitation of the bosses....and she is pursued by the union rep, a handsome man. Instead she becomes tied up in a subsequent dreary plot with Boyer. The first part of the film is charming and interesting and she's an arresting character. Even he is mildly interesting. The slice of 1939 life they partake of is very well played: going to the piers where people are cooling off pre AC, helping a kid who's skinned his knee, lost his pants held up by rope. He's pushing his friend in a go cart. After setting up an interesting film they are caught in a storm. Held up in a church. Which holds up the film. Even that is passably interesting. Finally, we meet Boyer's mad wife who isn't so addled when away from her mother and her minder. She wants her husband. And Dunne as a good woman in a 1939 movie, isn't going to fight her for him. This is all trite. Had it been a light, romantic comedy built around striking women it would have been a good film. A film about a strong, smart woman leading a strike. As it is...I guess this is what is called condescendingly "a woman's film" like today's "chick flicks" and it's a bore.
I love Dunne and Boyer and think they are a good match. However, I am constantly amazed at how long Irene Dunne was able to get away with 20-something roles. She is 41 here, and looks it. She is playing a waitress with a roommate who is about to strike for better pay. Her character at most would be 25. Yet producers continued to give Dunne these types of roles even after this movie. I don't really get it. When Lana Turner was in her early 40s, she was playing mothers of teenagers in "Imitation of Life" and "Portrait in Black" and Mary Astor had moved to these roles by the time she was 38. I don't understand why they weren't moving Dunne to more motherly roles by this time; she certainly does not look or act like an ingenue.
This is a heart-rending story covered up in a romantic comedy of many wonderful and surprising turnings, and it is impossible to guess at the sad conclusion of this very entertaining and stimulating journey. It's a typical Irene Dunne film, it's like a twin shadow of "Love Affair" of the same year, but although this film is more hearty and gleeful in its romantic ways, it is more tragic than "Love Affair", which puts on a more sinister fateful aspect but nevertheless ends better. Here you are faced with a truly hopeless situation with no end to its abysmal tragedy, which no one can do anything about, and still Charles Boyer and Irene Dunne settle to make the best of it and hope for tomorrow anyway, and maybe, after all, it will come...
This is not one of Stahl's best works.The movie lacks a center of gravity. Melodrama interferes with social topics(unions,strikes,meetings)and even a deluge,complete with a night in a temple.Besides,the Madeleine character appears too late and is hardly credible.She suffers from mental illness since she lost her child.And the unfortunate heroine tells her so:"you win because you're helpless". Charles Boyer plays the usual Latin lover,and Irene Dunne,the impossible love ,as she did in Fannie Hurst's famous tear-jerker. The ending is ambiguous:in his 1957 remake,the by now usual Sirk remake has ,it seems -I haven't seen it yet- ,a more definitive conclusion. All in all,watchable,because of the cast ,but ,not a great Stahl.
NB:I saw Sirk's remake yesterday (7/12/09).Stick with Stahl.
NB:I saw Sirk's remake yesterday (7/12/09).Stick with Stahl.
Love Affair proved so popular a film that Charles Boyer and Irene Dunne were
reteamed in When Tomorrow Comes at Universal Pictures.
Dunne who is usually chic and stylish plays a cafe waitress who gets to wait on Charles Boyer. No one there including Dunne realizes he's a world famous concert pianist.
Dunne goes on strike as the waitresses get organized. Boyer courts her when she's not on the picket line. They have a nice romantic interlude on Long Island when a hurricane hits.
Boyer is keeping secrets from her like the fact he's already married to Barbara O'Neil who has some mental issues.
There's a choice to be made by both of them that's obvious. What they do is for you to watch the film for.
Both keep up the same romantic standard set in Love Affair. When Tomorrow Comes won an Oscar for Sound Recording. Fans of the stars will approve
Dunne who is usually chic and stylish plays a cafe waitress who gets to wait on Charles Boyer. No one there including Dunne realizes he's a world famous concert pianist.
Dunne goes on strike as the waitresses get organized. Boyer courts her when she's not on the picket line. They have a nice romantic interlude on Long Island when a hurricane hits.
Boyer is keeping secrets from her like the fact he's already married to Barbara O'Neil who has some mental issues.
There's a choice to be made by both of them that's obvious. What they do is for you to watch the film for.
Both keep up the same romantic standard set in Love Affair. When Tomorrow Comes won an Oscar for Sound Recording. Fans of the stars will approve
Did you know
- TriviaAfter the movie came out, author James M. Cain sued Universal Pictures and director John M. Stahl for copyright violation. Although the movie was based on Cain's novel, "A Modern Cinderella," Cain claimed the filmmakers had stolen the scene where the two lovers take refuge in a church during a storm from his 1937 novel, "Serenade." Screenwriter Dwight Taylor admitted he'd taken the concept of the church scene from "Serenade," but had written an entirely new scene for the movie. The judge in the case ruled against Cain, saying there were significant differences between the book and movie scenes. The case established the legal principle of "scènes à faire" ("scenes to be written"), which states that certain concepts, settings, and devices (i.e. spy gadgets in spy novels) appear in multiple works of fiction and are therefore not subject to copyright laws. Today, the concept of "scènes à faire" is often used in software copyright cases, where certain types of programs, files, and variables appear in all software packages and cannot be copyrighted.
- GoofsWhen Boyer and Dunne head back to New York they stop at Karb's Restaurant to see that the labor strike is over. A man comes out of the revolving door at the front of the restaurant in a clockwise fashion. Revolving doors always rotate counter-clockwise, and the revolving door even has push handles on the opposite side of the door.
- ConnectionsRemade as Les amants de Salzbourg (1957)
- SoundtracksYankee Doodle
Traditional
Played by the busboys at the labor meeting
- How long is When Tomorrow Comes?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $1,000,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 32m(92 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content