Ma femme en feu

Lucille Ball -- in her first role heading the cast list -- wants to marry foreign fortune hunter Lee Bowman, but her father's will says she must marry an ordinary American if she is to inherit enough money to make her the richest woman in America. So she goes down a line of ditch diggers and settles on James Ellison and his Great Dane. She marries him, abandons him at a drug store and is going to get a divorce, but Ellison won't be the goat, so for reasons too tiresome to mention, they wind up going together to Reno in a trailer.

That's what's wrong with this screwball comedy. On the other hand, Garson Kanin directs with a light hand, and Miss Ball gives a good performance, without any of the mannerisms (funny though they would be) she would develop as she learned how to do comedy. See if you can spot Ned Glass in his third screen appearance. Hint: he has hair.

heiress lucille ball has to marry a 'plain American' to get her inheritance. already engaged to fortune hunter boyfriend lee bowman(is he really a count, who knows)she engages road worker james ellison, who is prepared to marry her for a certain summe of money...

not an unusual plot for a 30's screwball comedy..

one of few early films with lucille ball that i saw, i didn't expect a laughing riot (never liked her later TV persona much)but i was pleasantly surprised by this one.

the plot is funny and has a good tempo, lucille gives a good performance as an hysterical heiress, james ellison is a delight(never noticed him in any other movies though)and overall this movie amused me enough to catch it a second time..(which isn't that easy since its not commercially available) recommended

The plot to "Next Time I Marry" could have worked really well. However, whoever wrote the film really missed the mark when it came to Lucille Ball's character, Nancy. It strongly impacted how I liked the film...especially since it's supposed to be a romantic comedy.

When the story begins, Nancy stops at the side of the road and begins offering various men $500! Anthony (James Ellison) could use the money and he accepts...especially when she raises the money to $1000! So what does he need to do for the money? Marry her...a woman he just met!! Why would she do this? Apparently, she's an heiress but can only collect the money if she marries!

As I said, this idea could have worked. But the writer made Nancy unredeemingly selfish and cruel...to the point where it sure wasn't very funny. First, after marrying, she asks him to go get her some cigarettes in a store...and then drives away without him! Second, when he finally learns who he's married and where she lives, he shows up and she tells him to get lost....with no explanation why she did any of this!! To make it worse, Anthony had a dog in the car with her and she just dumped the animal at a kennel. When asked where, she basically said it wasn't important and she couldn't recall the place's name!! But it gets worse. Friends saw her being whisked away by Anthony (after he wants his dog!) and call the police. When the cops see the car and stops them, she claims she was kidnapped and he almost went to jail. But he is able to prove she's his wife....and the police let him go. Then, because she's angry at him and doesn't want to go with him (although he's done nothing wrong), she lights his trailer on fire!!! Why?? All this just makes Nancy seem evil and completely self-centered....and you really feel sorry for her poor husband. Can the film get better and overcome this huge problem as Anthony drives this 'lady' to Reno for a divorce?

This is an odd film and it reminds me of another Lucille Ball film where she played the most vicious person..."The Big Street". In it, she might have even been meaner and more self-centered! I am a person who can like her other films or TVs but still admit she made a few stinkers....and I can't see how either film would help her image with fans. However, I noticed that reviewers for both films totally ignored her nastiness and loved the films. I honestly feel as if they are more affirming their love of Ms. Ball than the films themselves because a rom-com simply is ineffective if you late the leading lady! Had they softened her characters in both, it would have helped tremendously.

So despite its faults is it worth seeing? Yes, but only as a time-passer. Had they softened Nancy more and made her change of heart less abrupt and inexplicable, I could have seen giving it a 6 or 7. As it is, a 4 seems reasonable.

By the way, I saw several reviews that talk about the racism in the film. I just didn't see it this way. Yes, Mantan Moreland plays a chauffer....so what?! Are they suggesting there should be no black characters in the film? I am just very confused by this...especially since, sadly, back in 1938 a job like this or a maid was pretty common for black Americans.

Next time I Marry stars Lucille Ball and any ensemble cast – it's just like an episode of her TV show – it even has a silver air stream trailer in which she would make the "The Long Long Trailer" almost twenty years later with Ricky. In the usual RKO mixed up love story caper, the rich girl must marry a common everyday guy (the dashing James Ellison) before she gets her family money, but she has many secrets and tricks up her sleeve, most of which don't work out as planned. Ellison's best-known role was Buffalo Bill in "The Plainsman" 1936, along with parts in many westerns. Lee Bowman plays a foreign count whose accent comes and goes in an un-convincing supporting role. As with most Lucy roles, as long as you buy into the story, you'll have a fun time. Look for Richard Elliott, the short jolly mayor from Andy Griffith, as the Justice of the Peace. Story is credited to Thames Williamson, but movie buffs will recognize a similar plot from four years before this. Also appears to be the second movie that Garson Kanin directed. Fun but a little silly!

I love Lucy, and she's adorable as usual in this pleasant outing, but James Ellison shows why he should have been cast in many more and different roles.

Yes, he was a great cowboy, but as a leading man, he was good-looking and manly and confident and in control.

As another reviewer said, this is pleasant fluff; and it has a story that has been used probably countless times in one form or another, but the four major characters are played so well, with Lee Bowman as the competitor for the rich woman and Mantan Moreland as his chauffeur, it's more than worth watching, just to see them.

Other, even unbilled, performers such as the great Earl Hodgins, work beautifully under director Garson Kanin and make this fun and worth the time. Enjoy.