[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

La Passion du docteur Hohner

Original title: The Climax
  • 1944
  • Approved
  • 1h 26m
IMDb RATING
5.4/10
1.1K
YOUR RATING
La Passion du docteur Hohner (1944)
HorrorMusicThriller

A demented physician becomes obsessed with a young singer whose voice sounds similar to his late mistress.A demented physician becomes obsessed with a young singer whose voice sounds similar to his late mistress.A demented physician becomes obsessed with a young singer whose voice sounds similar to his late mistress.

  • Director
    • George Waggner
  • Writers
    • Curt Siodmak
    • Lynn Starling
    • Edward Locke
  • Stars
    • Boris Karloff
    • Susanna Foster
    • Turhan Bey
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    5.4/10
    1.1K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • George Waggner
    • Writers
      • Curt Siodmak
      • Lynn Starling
      • Edward Locke
    • Stars
      • Boris Karloff
      • Susanna Foster
      • Turhan Bey
    • 35User reviews
    • 27Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Nominated for 1 Oscar
      • 2 nominations total

    Photos65

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 59
    View Poster

    Top cast38

    Edit
    Boris Karloff
    Boris Karloff
    • Dr. Friedrich Hohner
    Susanna Foster
    Susanna Foster
    • Angela Klatt
    Turhan Bey
    Turhan Bey
    • Franz Munzer
    Gale Sondergaard
    Gale Sondergaard
    • Luise
    Thomas Gomez
    Thomas Gomez
    • Count Seebruck
    June Vincent
    June Vincent
    • Marcellina
    George Dolenz
    George Dolenz
    • Amato Roselli
    Ludwig Stössel
    Ludwig Stössel
    • Carl Baumann
    Jane Farrar
    Jane Farrar
    • Jarmila Vadek
    Ernö Verebes
    Ernö Verebes
    • Brunn
    • (as Erno Verebes)
    Lotte Stein
    Lotte Stein
    • Mama Hinzl
    Scotty Beckett
    Scotty Beckett
    • The King
    William Edmunds
    • Leon - Theatre Concierge
    Maxwell Hayes
    • Count Romburg - King's Aide
    Dorothy Lawrence
    • Miss Metzger
    Ernie Adams
    Ernie Adams
    • Man in Audience Next to Franz
    • (uncredited)
    Gertrude Astor
    Gertrude Astor
    • Woman in Audience Behind Franz
    • (uncredited)
    Polly Bailey
    • Cleaning Woman
    • (uncredited)
    • Director
      • George Waggner
    • Writers
      • Curt Siodmak
      • Lynn Starling
      • Edward Locke
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews35

    5.41.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    3theowinthrop

    A Curious Failure

    This film was the first one to star Boris Karloff that was in color. As such, it illustrates that to be the first of anything is meaningless if the film lacks coherence, intelligence, and a decent script. The plot begins by taking the viewers into an old theater, where Karloff is shown coming night after night. He has the sympathies of the staff of the theater. It seems that ten years earlier he was engaged to the prima donna singer at the theater, and they were to get married. But on the night before the marriage she vanished, and he - broken hearted (apparently) - has returned every night ever since as though waiting for her.

    Now this could have been the start of an intriguing film. Unfortunately the scriptwriters did not see fit to leave the audience tantalized by Karloff's apparent tragedy. Instead, he falls asleep in his chair and we see his subconscious revealing what happened. The prima donna broke off the wedding in a bitter argument, and Karloff killed her (but as they were alone, he was able to hide the body and cover his tracks). So instead of playing with audience support for Karloff, the script writers show he is up to his typical evil roles.

    The only one who suspects that Karloff is not what he seems is Gale Sondergaard - she remembers what her former mistress was like that night, and there were signs that she was uncertain about the wedding. But she never had anything concrete to work with.

    The theater impresario is Thomas Gomez. One of his musicians/composers (Turhan Bey) is interested in furthering the career of a new singer, Susannah Foster, whom he is dating. Gomez is willing to put her on. But Karloff, who is the theater's doctor, sees Foster (who reminds him of the dead prima donna). Fixed on her, he decides to pursue her (although she is increasingly frightened of him).

    This is the set-up for the plot, and how it eventually leads to the revelation of the fate of the dead woman. It is a tired plot, mostly because there is little chemistry between Foster and Karloff (although that is not a fatal flaw - he is fixed on her, she need not show any type of fascination towards him). Sondergaard is wasted (occasionally, as the film progresses, she reveals her suspicions). Gomez, normally a considerably good villain himself, plays his jovial side as the impresario. As for Turhan Bey, he shows great interest in Foster - and she is shown singing in one of his new operettas (the music of which is a steal from Schubert's Marche Militaire).

    The end result is that the viewer is not deeply interested (after awhile) in the fates of these characters. Even when Karloff (at one point) knocks out Ludwig Stossel, our lack of interest in the "little old wine maker" actor prevents us getting too concerned (Ludwig recovers by the way). Given that the film was supplied with a grade A film gloss (by using color stock) it is ironic that the whole effect is basically thrown away. It does not help matters, to the fans of Boris Karloff, that one year after this color-film flop, he gave one of his greatest performances in Val Lewton's THE BODY SNATCHER as Grey the Coachman - in a black and white film with a meaty script. Instead of Technicolor, the production people should have concentrated on good writing and plotting. I will give it a "3" only because it is visually good, but otherwise it was a waste of time and money.
    Michael_Elliott

    Technically Good But Deadly Boring

    The Climax (1944)

    ** (out of 4)

    Boris Karloff returned to Universal Studios playing Dr. Frederich Hohner, a man most people believe is haunted by the disappearance of a female opera singer ten years earlier. What they don't realize is that he actually murdered her. In present times he hears the beautiful Angela Klatt (Susanna Foster) sing and her voice reminds him of the one he killed so he plans to control the new singer.

    THE CLIMAX was Karloff's return to the studio that made him a legend and the company went all out in regards to what the film has to offer. They gave him director George Waggner who had just scored a major success with THE WOLF MAN. They allowed the film to be shot in Technicolor. They even went all out with a higher budget and a classier looking picture. Everything is here except for a story, energy or any passion. I'm always shocked that Universal threw everything at this picture yet they basically delivered a rehash of SVENGALI and PHANTOM OF THE OPERA.

    On a technical level this film is very impressive as the visuals really jump off the screen. The Technicolor is extremely beautiful and especially the dresses and costumes in the picture. Just wait until you see the fire at the end as it looks incredible. The music itself is quite good if you really judge it and I'd argue that the cast is very good as well. This includes Karloff who has no problem playing the passion that this role requires. Foster, Turhan Bey and Gale Sondergaard are all good as well.

    So, what's the problem with THE CLIMAX? It's the story, which is downright boring and the movie ends up moving so slow that it feels twice as long. I really don't know why Universal did this to Karloff and offered such a boring screenplay and especially when they had just done PHANTOM OF THE OPERA the previous year.
    SkippyDevereaux

    Technicolor can't do everything for a film!!

    From the opening music to the final scene, this has got to be one of the most beautiful horror films ever made. Unfortunately, as I said before, technicolor can't do everything for a film. While it is visually stunning in every way, it lacks a credible storyline, and that is what drags the film down. I guess one shouldn't call it a horror film, rather it might a psychological type film, as there is only one murder( and a rather mild one at that). I thought that the opera singing was a bit too much, but what did I expect when the film is about an opera singer!! But I found it to be just like "The Shadow", they are beautiful to look at, but there isn't anything else for the film to succeed.
    6Bunuel1976

    THE CLIMAX (George Waggner, 1944) **1/2

    This much-maligned Boris Karloff vehicle is actually not too bad; then again, the 1943 version of PHANTOM OF THE OPERA - for which this was a follow-up, conveniently filmed on the same expensive sets - isn't very popular with horror fans either.

    Many have stated that Karloff sleepwalks through his role here: true, it doesn't really extend his range but, given that he was headlining a super-production and being the consummate professional that he was, I hardly believe he could afford to be indifferent about it (and, in any case, it returned him to territory he had already covered in CHARLIE CHAN AT THE OPERA [1936])! It's fairly enjoyable in itself, if not a little silly (Karloff demanding that his sweetheart stop her glorious singing career merely because he's jealous of all the admiration she's getting, his hypnotic control over the Susanna Foster character being exercised by means of a flask of atomizer {throat spray}!), and the lavishly colorful production is certainly attractive. The musical numbers are more 'modern' than those in PHANTOM, though there are still too many of them (remaining, in any case, a matter of taste!).

    Foster does okay by her role but I agree that Turhan Bey is totally miscast and almost sinks the film; however, the supporting cast is pretty good - above all Gale Sondergaard (in a surprisingly sympathetic role), Thomas Gomez and Ludwig Stossel.The film's best sequences would have to be the murder of Karloff's wife, the hypnotism sessions (highlighting Karloff's glaring eyes in close-up) and the fiery climax {sic} (as in THE BLACK CAT [1934], Karloff keeps the body of his dead wife embalmed in a secret room) - in essence, all the horrific elements there are.

    P.S. According to the "Classic Horror Film Board", as was the case with Universal's initial DVD release of Dracula (1931), this film is missing the underscoring during the opening sequence (not having watched THE CLIMAX previously, I couldn't have known about this) - how the hell does something like this happen...?!
    5utgard14

    There's the Opera But Where's the Phantom?

    The sets are gorgeous, the cast is good, Karloff is always fun to watch. Unfortunately someone forgot this is supposed to be a thriller and decided what audiences really loved was opera. So much of this movie is devoted to operatic musical numbers. I was having to mute the tv often. That stuff just gives me a headache. It's still worth a look for Karloff, the lovely Technicolor, and the impressive sets. Just be aware that it's not a horror film even by the standards of 1944, and it's got way too much focus on opera.

    More like this

    Alerte la nuit
    6.3
    Alerte la nuit
    Le mystère du château noir
    6.3
    Le mystère du château noir
    L'échappé de la chaise électrique
    6.1
    L'échappé de la chaise électrique
    Le château de la terreur
    6.2
    Le château de la terreur
    Strange Confession
    6.5
    Strange Confession
    Nuit d'épouvante
    6.1
    Nuit d'épouvante
    Accident
    6.8
    Accident
    Home in Indiana
    6.5
    Home in Indiana
    La tour de Londres
    6.6
    La tour de Londres
    La Malédiction des hommes-chats
    6.7
    La Malédiction des hommes-chats
    L'Odyssée du docteur Wassell
    6.6
    L'Odyssée du docteur Wassell
    La Falaise mystérieuse
    7.2
    La Falaise mystérieuse

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      This film was shot on the lavish sets created for Le fantôme de l'opéra (1943) in an attempt to recoup the large budget of that film. The opera house set had been built for the original Le Fantôme de l'opéra (1925) starring Lon Chaney, and this extraordinary set still exists on the Universal Studios lot. It is the oldest surviving movie set in the world.
    • Goofs
      In the rehearsal sequence in which Angela loses her voice at the sight of Dr. Hohner, she closes her mouth a split second before the playback of her voice stops.
    • Quotes

      Dr. Hohner: You don't want to ruin that voice, do you? It isn't yours, remember? Now tell me, whose voice is it?... Tell me!

      Angela: Marcellina's!

    • Connections
      Featured in Movie 4 Tonight: The Climax (1970)
    • Soundtracks
      Three Marches Militaires
      (opus 51)

      Composed by Franz Schubert

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ16

    • How long is The Climax?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • October 20, 1944 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • The Climax
    • Filming locations
      • Universal Studios - 100 Universal City Plaza, Universal City, California, USA(Studio)
    • Production company
      • Universal Pictures
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 26 minutes
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    La Passion du docteur Hohner (1944)
    Top Gap
    By what name was La Passion du docteur Hohner (1944) officially released in India in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.