Lonely Wives

When sound pictures arrived in the late 1920s-early 30s audiences were so fascinated by the spectacle of actors talking that any number of stage plays were simply photographed more or less as they had played in front of live audiences. No better example than this talky, very silly French-style farce based on a comedy credited to the Hungarian producer A.H. Woods famous on Broadway for importing risqué European fare to New York. As stagey as the RKO film is, it gives us a wonderful opportunity to see one of the great farceurs, Edward Everett Horton, at his best in a dual role a few years before becoming second banana in numerous Fred Astaire-Ginger Rogers movies. Here, he is matched for once by the performance of the delightful Canadian actress Maude Eburne as the mother-in-law, probably the best role she ever had in a long Hollywood career of much smaller parts.

I chuckled more than once at the convoluted goings on in this farce filled with sexual innuendos. Edward Everett Horton is good in his double role as both a famous womanizing lawyer called Richard and a vaudeville impersonator called Felix. Felix wants to add Richard to his list of people he impersonates and would get permission only if he can fool Richard's mother-in-law, Maude Eburne, for a night. Meanwhile, Richard goes to meet Laura La Plante about getting a divorce from her husband, who happens to be Felix, although Richard doesn't know it. And Richard's wife, Esther Ralston, comes home from a vacation early and spends the night with Felix, disguised as Richard.

I was impressed with the smooth special effects when both Richard and Felix appear onscreen at the same time. It was done, of course, by a double exposure, but the timing of their conversations was perfect. As the befuddled butler, Spencer Charters overplays his role when he gets conflicting commands by both Felix and Richard and it was a bit tedious and predictable. The rest of the cast was fine. This is a good example of a pre-code sex farce.

The origins of the story was a 1912 German vaudeville act called "Tanzanwaltz" by Pordes Milo, Walter Schütt and Dr. Eric Urban. Although A.H. Woods is credited onscreen as the writer of the 1922 play on which this movie is based, contemporary reviews list him only as producer, with Walter De Leon and Mark Swan as the English language adaptors.

Maybe it is as not as good as I rated it, but I thoroughly enjoyed this little movie. It has lots of little saucy lines in the script and the main character, a defense attorney, delivers his with style and wit. His secretary is quite a little number as well.

I am sure this does not rank up there in any list of great early films, and I had never even heard of it, but I came across it on youtube today, posted in full, and completely enjoyed it.

When a client comes to call, the lawyer tells him he can only spare five minutes. The client flatters him and he responds "maybe 10 minutes." Not hysterical but the way he says it brought a laugh.

Overall, maybe a silly little film, but not a bad one, and fun to watch.

The title and advertising for this film are salacious in that laughable pre-Code way; "All hot and bothered...wild husbands on the loose," read one. The plot that sets up this early sex farce is awfully contrived; it has a guy showing up to a lawyer's office who looks identical to him (both men are played by Edward Everett Horton), allowing the lawyer to slip out and have some fun with a couple of women at the "Whoopee Club" 'til dawn, and then his wife to unexpectedly return from a vacation all rarin' to go with the stranger she assumes is her husband. "I bought a new lace nightie yesterday that's positively indecent - wait 'til you see it!" she says. Meanwhile, one of the women the lawyer has gone out with just happens to be the other guy's wife.

It's pretty damn silly and if you're looking for something sophisticated, skip this film (which I guess you could have guessed from the title). In addition, the quality of the print which survives is pretty poor, the cast (aside from Horton) lacks star power, and the aspects of the plot in the middle of the film that focus on the butler's confusion and the mother-in-law's delight over possibly getting a grandchild are overdone and quickly become tiring.

However, it does have its moments, starting with the sassy secretary (Patsy Ruth Miller) who likes strutting across the room to show her boss her "wiggle." There is an air of subversive desire in the film; the new client (Laura La Plante) who comes to the lawyer to ask about a divorce doesn't mind if her husband stays out at night, as long as she could always depend on him doing so, so that she could have some fun herself. When the lawyer plans to meet both her and his secretary later that night, she says "But wouldn't you be embarrassed with two girls?" and he replies "Two? And me feeling positively Oriental?" There are several more lines like this, and it's kind of fun seeing two Edward Everett Horton's on the screen at the same time. In the screwball mayhem towards the end, one of the film's better sequences, watch for the moment when he hurdles over his mother-in-law, who's fallen down during a chase up the staircase. The film could certainly have been better, but it was mildly amusing.

Mildly interesting comedy with Edward Everett Horton given an rare leading role. He even refers to a "bedroom farce" with one of the other women during the film.

This movie has been well reviewed by others. Only two other comments. Exactly how is it that Mr. Zero can not only can make himself up to be an exact physical double of Mr. Smith, but he can also imitate the same effete, nervous-Nellie personality of someone he has never before met? The film would have been more interesting, as in other films where someone is impersonating another, if he had a less exaggerated persona. Also, of note is the fact that the three main female leads, all more famous in the silent era than after-wards, all lived into their 90's.