IMDb RATING
5.8/10
906
YOUR RATING
A Duke usurps his brother's land and power, banishing him and his entourage into the forest of Arden. The banished Duke's daughter, Rosalind, remains with her cousin Celia. She has fallen in... Read allA Duke usurps his brother's land and power, banishing him and his entourage into the forest of Arden. The banished Duke's daughter, Rosalind, remains with her cousin Celia. She has fallen in love with Orlando.A Duke usurps his brother's land and power, banishing him and his entourage into the forest of Arden. The banished Duke's daughter, Rosalind, remains with her cousin Celia. She has fallen in love with Orlando.
J. Fisher White
- Adam
- (as Fisher White)
W.K. Clark
- Guard
- (uncredited)
Featured reviews
Laurence Olivier in his first Shakespeare adaptation on screen. This is the first motif to see this old film , good kick to discover the root of classic performances from Shakespeare universe.
The second virtue - the noble effort of Elizabeth Bergner to create a beautiful Rosalind portrait , using her experience in polish of it on German scene. Her accent ? I saw it as good point , defining exactly the determination to propose a professional performance.
Yes, not great but profound charming, offering a seductive return to the connection between rosalind and Orlando and decent solutions for a real seductive adaptation.
The second virtue - the noble effort of Elizabeth Bergner to create a beautiful Rosalind portrait , using her experience in polish of it on German scene. Her accent ? I saw it as good point , defining exactly the determination to propose a professional performance.
Yes, not great but profound charming, offering a seductive return to the connection between rosalind and Orlando and decent solutions for a real seductive adaptation.
The main role, Rosalind, is well-played by the cute, vivacious Bergner. Olivier is good with the physical stuff (very graceful) and the repartee. He tends to fall flat on the soliloquies and extended reveries, though. (And he's wearing way too much makeup, including at times some very crooked lipstick.) The costumes and sets are vivid, probably meant to suggest a fairy-tale, and thus account for the ridiculous plot devices.
And despite the comments of another reviewer, the camera-work is not all "point-and-shoot." It is a bit static by today's standards, but not by those of 1936.
The biggest liability is the muddy, distant sound.
All in all, I liked it more than the average filmed Shakespeare, though it's not great by any means.
And despite the comments of another reviewer, the camera-work is not all "point-and-shoot." It is a bit static by today's standards, but not by those of 1936.
The biggest liability is the muddy, distant sound.
All in all, I liked it more than the average filmed Shakespeare, though it's not great by any means.
10clanciai
This is very much in the same style as Max Reinhardt's ambitious rendering of "A Midsummer Night's Dream" a few years earlier, it's the same playfulness, the same fantastic imagination and innovations, the same good humour and the same kind of gorgeous sets with a number of sumptuous crowd scenes, and instead of Mendelssohn's music you have William Walton, who actually proves just as appropriate. This is one of those plays that are almost impossible to fail in, as it is so ingenious and well written with such adorable characters, and both Elisabeth Bergner and Laurence Olivier do credit to them indeed, Bergner actually almost outshining Olivier, whose fírst Shakespeare film this was. In comparison with Kenneth Branagh's version 70 years later, this is actually so much more enoyable, although it's without colours and much shorter, but Branagh's production is heavier, he has the tendency to always overdo everything in his films, and in this version everything is convincing and true to the original character of the play, while Branagh always must modernize and almost screw it up. The doiminating trait of the film is a very playful direction, you feel throughout that the director enjoyed doing this, perhaps even more than Reinhardt in the midsummer night play with Mickey Rooney as Puck and James Cagney as Bottom, and later on Paul Czinner made some of the best ballet films ever made. In brief, in spite of its early age and lack of technical maturity, this is a perfect Shakespeare film.
Famous for being the first British film adaptation of a Shakespeare's play, the movie is focused primarily on the tour de force of Elisabeth Bergner, who, German accent aside, succedes to give the character a genuine enthusiasm and lightness. Laurence Olivier is good-looking and elegant, but not yet as captivating as in his future memorable interpretations. Probably, the real interest of the film lies in the impressive technical cast, made up of greats such as David Lean (brilliant editing), Jack Cardiff and Harold Rosson (photography) and William Walton (music). Anyway, with a good cast to watch, the film stands as a valid document of how Shakespare was performed at the time.
In his first Shakespearian film, handsome nobleman Laurence Olivier (as Orlando) is tricked into a wrestling match by nasty brother John Laurie (as Oliver). Assumed to be the doomed underdog, Mr. Olivier surprises everyone by winning. He also catches the eye of Duke's daughter Elisabeth Bergner (as Rosalind), who is enamored with the younger man in tights. Olivier is likewise attracted to Ms. Bergner. They are banished, separately, to the animal-friendly Forest of Arden, where Bergner is disguised as a man...
This is a serviceable retelling of the Shakespearian comedy. Today, people may watch it for Olivier, but it's made for Bergner, who received "Best Actress" praise for previous performances in "The Rise of Catherine the Great" (1934, New York Times) and "Escape Me Never" (1935, Academy Awards nomination). All three pictures were directed by her husband Paul Czinner. Bergner is most appealing, but not convincing, in her scenes as the young man "Ganymede" with cousin Sophie Stewart (as Celia).
***** As You Like It (9/3/36) Paul Czinner ~ Elisabeth Bergner, Laurence Olivier, Sophie Stewart, John Laurie
This is a serviceable retelling of the Shakespearian comedy. Today, people may watch it for Olivier, but it's made for Bergner, who received "Best Actress" praise for previous performances in "The Rise of Catherine the Great" (1934, New York Times) and "Escape Me Never" (1935, Academy Awards nomination). All three pictures were directed by her husband Paul Czinner. Bergner is most appealing, but not convincing, in her scenes as the young man "Ganymede" with cousin Sophie Stewart (as Celia).
***** As You Like It (9/3/36) Paul Czinner ~ Elisabeth Bergner, Laurence Olivier, Sophie Stewart, John Laurie
Did you know
- TriviaLaurence Olivier trained with professional wrestlers for the wrestling scenes, and did his filming during the day while he was playing on stage in "Romeo and Juliet" at night.
- Quotes
Exiled Duke: Sweet are the uses of adversity.
- Alternate versionsDifferent prints have conflicting credits. For the 1936 U.S. version, Robert Cullen is credited (as R.J. Cullen) for production manager and scenario, but for the 1949 re-release, he is credited only as production manager, and 'Carl Mayer' is credited with adaptation. Similarly, for the 1936 version, Elisabeth Bergner's name is above the title for the opening credits, but in the 1949 re-release Laurence Olivier's name is above the title (as can be seen from the IMDb poster).
- ConnectionsFeatured in Great Performances: Laurence Olivier: A Life (1983)
- How long is As You Like It?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 36m(96 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content