The Mystery Man

The Mystery Man (1935)

Well this is a fast hoot, and not a good movie by any means. It has a chipper tone and some comic twists, but the acting, the acting.

The core idea is good--a news reporter with a thankless editor gets caught up in a story while on leave from his Chicago paper. But the St. Louis newspaper won't believe he's a reporter, and he gets stranded and eventually accused. Luckily his buddies back home help out, and even better, a pretty girl is also stranded and helpless and good for moral support and some cleverness in the nick of time. Coulda been something.

It's not like 1935 is too early for a snappy, intelligent crime detective caper film. We've already had a string of absolute classics from Warner Bros. in the early 30s, and we're seeing the beginning of the "Thin Man" series with its high level of sophistication. But this is a B-movie through and through, and I guess there is only so much talent to go around.

You would do better plodding through the worst of the Mr. Moto or the Charlie Chan films than this one.

Following a drunken night out, an ace Chicago reporter loses his job. Arriving in St. Louis penniless, he meets a girl in a similar position and they team up. After a gun he pawned is used in a murder, they have to solve the crime to avoid arrest.

Average crime story with just a touch of humour but really needing a stronger script. However, despite this, Robert Armstrong does the best that he can and gives a decent performance. Maxine Doyle plays the girl.

It's not annoying or boring, but plot point by plot point it makes little sense. And yet is a fun and breezy little film, so I give it 6/10.

This was made by poverty row stalwart, Monogram and directed by Ray McCarey, younger brother of famed director Leo McCarey. Larry Doyle (Robert Armstrong) is a Chicago reporter who drinks heavily and gambles heavily, always annoying his boss, the city editor. Early on the police department gives Larry an award for cracking criminal cases as part of his job as a crime reporter. And they give him as a gift - a 45 caliber police revolver??? Then Larry resigns from his job and goes to St. Louis in the middle of the Great Depression with no money and no job.(???) There he meets a jobless broke girl, Anne, and although he acts like a total creepster and hits on her, she agrees to - check into an expensive hotel with him posing as his wife and order a large expensive meal for which they cannot pay??? Strangely enough, Larry stops treating Ann like an object as soon as they are alone in a hotel room, registered as man and wife.

Larry thinks he can get and keep a job with a local paper as a crime reporter if he can catch a local serial robber, "the eel". But instead he winds up accused of being the eel with a complicating factor that every time somebody calls his old managing editor and asks him to verify Larry's identity he claims that Larry Doyle is still in Chicago. Complications ensue.

The first half of the film moved quickly enough, but it is all over the map and contains lots of pointless scenes that appear to be filler to get this to feature length. Things pick up in the second half once Larry tries to catch The Eel and is then accused of being him, with Larry needing to catch the actual Eel to keep from being charged with murder. I saw a very good print of this film on youtube that looks like it has been restored with both the audio and video being quite crisp.

Just bearable, just bearable, that's what I have to say about this amusing and after all fast paced film from the thirties, a feature about which I did not expect anything special. And I was damn right. Plot offering something seen ten million times before but, I repeat, for those of you who crave about such films, you can proceed without problem. Those mystery yarns were galore in this thirties period. This is not a real crime film as I crave for, because you have a good hero for whom you can foresee the ending. You have gangsters, armed robbery yes, but that's not enough for me to qualify it as a crime movie. But it remains a good little B picture.

Cinematic archeology is what this is all about. The film has lost all its appeal as the hooks have gone out of style. But we can see major chunks that have evolved to what we have now.

The basic setup is the fold of a reporter as a detective, a miraculously simple concept in narration, as his job is to 'get the story.'

He has an easy hookup with a perky girl, though cleanly post-code.

Our reporter is an adventure-loving party man (which then meant an occasional drunk) who cannot keep money and who hates authority.

The environment is one in which police are inept and essentially invisible, and 'the paper' runs the town behind the scenes. You can easily see the seeds of noir here.

Oh, and we have a stereotyped villain, a mystery man who calls himself The Eel and who calls to taunt police (represented by the DA).

Good digging here, if you have the patience.

Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.