Ronald Colman plays an MP addicted to drugs, and a double recruited to cover for him.Ronald Colman plays an MP addicted to drugs, and a double recruited to cover for him.Ronald Colman plays an MP addicted to drugs, and a double recruited to cover for him.
- Awards
- 2 wins total
Harry Allen
- Bartender
- (uncredited)
Frank Baker
- Member of the House
- (uncredited)
Bill Elliott
- Party Guest
- (uncredited)
Cissy Fitzgerald
- Dancing Dowager
- (uncredited)
Creighton Hale
- Bobby Blessington
- (uncredited)
Henry Hebert
- Member of the House
- (uncredited)
Olaf Hytten
- Doctor
- (uncredited)
Grace Poggi
- Bit Role
- (uncredited)
Alexander Pollard
- Member of the House
- (uncredited)
C. Montague Shaw
- Speaker of the House
- (uncredited)
Featured reviews
The main plot idea in this film is that two cousins are completely alike physically--so much so that when one substitutes for another no one knows! Although this is a familiar film and TV theme (such as in "The Patty Duke Show"), it is rather stupid--cousins don't look THAT close to each other and how could they account for the same voice and mannerisms? My advice is to try to look past this impossibility and just enjoy this wonderful film. And, by the way, that's my same advice for another Ronald Colman film made just a few years later--where, in THE PRISONER OF ZENDA, you are expected to believe that distant cousins are spitting images! Now, provided you can look past all this, the film is actually quite good.
The film begins with Ronald Colman #1. He's a drug-addicted member of the British parliament and his party is disappointed in him again and again because he is almost totally incapacitated by the drug he drinks. They never really say WHAT it is--I assume it's Laudanum. Anyways, when this falling down addict discovers that he's got a long lost and identical cousin (Ronald Colman #2), he begs the cousin to take his place. Unfortunately, things do too well--as the longer the substitute pretends to be the once-great parliamentarian, the bigger his reputation becomes! To make things worse, Ronald Colman #1's estranged wife is now attracted to who she THINKS is her husband and Ronald Colmen #2 is too nice a guy to just sleep with her! The whole thing sounds a bit comedic, but it's not. However, it is a nice drama with romantic overtones.
What makes it so good is the wonderful performances by Colman (he is his usual erudite self) as well as good writing--particularly the ending which is NOT what you'd normally expect and increased my love for this film immensely.
The film begins with Ronald Colman #1. He's a drug-addicted member of the British parliament and his party is disappointed in him again and again because he is almost totally incapacitated by the drug he drinks. They never really say WHAT it is--I assume it's Laudanum. Anyways, when this falling down addict discovers that he's got a long lost and identical cousin (Ronald Colman #2), he begs the cousin to take his place. Unfortunately, things do too well--as the longer the substitute pretends to be the once-great parliamentarian, the bigger his reputation becomes! To make things worse, Ronald Colman #1's estranged wife is now attracted to who she THINKS is her husband and Ronald Colmen #2 is too nice a guy to just sleep with her! The whole thing sounds a bit comedic, but it's not. However, it is a nice drama with romantic overtones.
What makes it so good is the wonderful performances by Colman (he is his usual erudite self) as well as good writing--particularly the ending which is NOT what you'd normally expect and increased my love for this film immensely.
It is a shame this film is so hard to find. Ronald Coleman does an excellent job in his dual role of Chilcote/Loder. The two characters are quite opposite and I might venture to call his delivery remarkable. It is similar in some ways to the Prisoner of Zenda, which indeed is a good film, but I prefer the ending of this one. Elissa Landi, her usual sweet and serenely beautiful self, is the model of a faithful wife. She did an excellent job as the wronged, but still loving wife who returns to help her husband in a time of need. It is a great shame that she did not make more films and is not better remembered to-day. She almost always played gentle, ladylike, loving, and thoughtful roles and did so very convincingly. Combine that with being very pretty and you have a good actress in my opinion. Try to find this one on ebay!!
It's a very funny comedy, it's a moving drama, it's a heartfelt tragedy, it's a great feel-good movie, it's a clever satire, it's exciting....it's simply brilliant! As absurdly far-fetched the story is, you still believe in what you're watching.
It's set in the 1920s, a time when countries were looking for "a great man" to save them from the economic catastrophe of the paying for the war. We also had the much more serious, GABRIEL OVER THE WHITEHOUSE where a 'fascist' president took over the US - that was in a time when fascism hadn't turned into what it became and wasn't a dirty word yet. I wonder did Oswald Mosley watch these films and thought this could be about him? Had he not gone so horribly, horribly off-track, he might very well have been a great leader instead of what he became. In this, Ronald Colman's charismatic and inspiring MP might have been that man once upon a time but not now. It's for the other Ronald Colman to save the day! Although this is a daft comedy, it does engage your brain and get those little grey cells working.
If today you tried to pitch a film idea to a studio of something like a mix between TOP HAT with THE WEST WING you'd get booted out of the office but that is kind of one way to describe this. Amazingly it doesn't just work, it really works. If you enjoying a comedy with proper serious acting and a clever plot, you should love this.
Both Ronald Colmans (Colmen?) are at their charming and erudite best. Their performances and the overall exceptional production values makes the utterly preposterous story seem perfectly plausible and great fun. The film has a lovely warm comforting assurance to it. You know from the first five minutes what's going to happen so you can relax in its gently massaging water as it hugs you to the inevitable happy ending.
This is one of those early thirties pictures that's as entertaining today as the day it when it was made. You don't need to like ancient movies to like this one, just well-made ones.
It's set in the 1920s, a time when countries were looking for "a great man" to save them from the economic catastrophe of the paying for the war. We also had the much more serious, GABRIEL OVER THE WHITEHOUSE where a 'fascist' president took over the US - that was in a time when fascism hadn't turned into what it became and wasn't a dirty word yet. I wonder did Oswald Mosley watch these films and thought this could be about him? Had he not gone so horribly, horribly off-track, he might very well have been a great leader instead of what he became. In this, Ronald Colman's charismatic and inspiring MP might have been that man once upon a time but not now. It's for the other Ronald Colman to save the day! Although this is a daft comedy, it does engage your brain and get those little grey cells working.
If today you tried to pitch a film idea to a studio of something like a mix between TOP HAT with THE WEST WING you'd get booted out of the office but that is kind of one way to describe this. Amazingly it doesn't just work, it really works. If you enjoying a comedy with proper serious acting and a clever plot, you should love this.
Both Ronald Colmans (Colmen?) are at their charming and erudite best. Their performances and the overall exceptional production values makes the utterly preposterous story seem perfectly plausible and great fun. The film has a lovely warm comforting assurance to it. You know from the first five minutes what's going to happen so you can relax in its gently massaging water as it hugs you to the inevitable happy ending.
This is one of those early thirties pictures that's as entertaining today as the day it when it was made. You don't need to like ancient movies to like this one, just well-made ones.
'The Masquerader', an obscure drama starring Ronald Colman, is very similar in its premise and subplots to Colman's great vehicle 'The Prisoner of Zenda' ... but he did 'The Masquerader' first. As in 'Zenda', Colman plays lookalike cousins who meet after many years of living in two different countries ... one of whom has an opportunity to take over the other's life, while falling in love with the other man's disenchanted lady.
Colman's main role is John Loder (no relation to the bland actor of that name), a disaffected journalist who returns to his native England after many years abroad. Loder's more successful cousin is Sir John Chilcote, a prominent member of Parliament. But Chilcote is secretly a morphine addict, and his addiction is becoming harder to conceal. Also concealed (not very well) is Chilcote's philandering relationship with Lady Joyce, while his estranged wife Eve (Lady Chilcote) is humiliated on the sidelines.
When Sir John's addiction causes him to collapse just before he introduces a crucial piece of legislation, Chilcote's loyal manservant Brock persuades Loder to impersonate his cousin. Loder, pretending to be Chilcote, gives an impassioned speech on the floor of Commons. Lady Chilcote has been estranged from her husband for years; now, attending this speech, she wonders why she is suddenly attracted to her husband again ... not realising that this is actually Loder impersonating Lady Chilcote's husband. (Shades of Princess Flavia in 'Zenda'.) Meanwhile, Loder (still pretending to be Chilcote) is utterly cold to Chilcote's mistress Lady Joyce, much to her bafflement.
SPOILERS COMING. Sir John dies of his addiction, without this becoming public knowledge. Brock persuades Loder to abandon his own life and become Sir John Chilcote permanently, appropriating Chilcote's wealth and reputation. Of course, this means that Loder will now be married to Lady Chilcote. Hmmm...
'The Masquerader' is not very plausible, yet it's quite enjoyable. Ronald Colman gives two distinctly different performances in the lookalike roles... although his turn as the drug-addicted Chilcote is a bit too overwrought. Moss Hart's smooth dialogue papers over some of the cracks in the plot line. Gregg Toland's photography is up to his usual high standard, and I was especially impressed by the scenes in which both Ronald Colmans are on screen at the same go. (Most dual-role movies made during this period featured flat sideline lighting during the double-exposure sequences; Toland avoids this.) Also well-photographed is a night sequence in Hyde Park (filmed on the Goldwyn Studio's backlot); Toland keeps the lighting bright enough for us to see the action, but dark enough to minimise the obvious fakery of the scenery. Creighton Hale is good in a small role. In the role of Lady Eve Chilcote, Elissa Landi is appropriately patrician (and slightly less blonde than usual), but her performance is weak. In the role of Lady Joyce, Juliette Compton is so dull and unattractive that I had difficulty believing Sir John would ever prefer her to his wife. The studio reconstruction of the House of Commons is a lot more convincing than I expected it to be, especially for a Yank film. I'll rate this movie 8 out of 10.
Colman's main role is John Loder (no relation to the bland actor of that name), a disaffected journalist who returns to his native England after many years abroad. Loder's more successful cousin is Sir John Chilcote, a prominent member of Parliament. But Chilcote is secretly a morphine addict, and his addiction is becoming harder to conceal. Also concealed (not very well) is Chilcote's philandering relationship with Lady Joyce, while his estranged wife Eve (Lady Chilcote) is humiliated on the sidelines.
When Sir John's addiction causes him to collapse just before he introduces a crucial piece of legislation, Chilcote's loyal manservant Brock persuades Loder to impersonate his cousin. Loder, pretending to be Chilcote, gives an impassioned speech on the floor of Commons. Lady Chilcote has been estranged from her husband for years; now, attending this speech, she wonders why she is suddenly attracted to her husband again ... not realising that this is actually Loder impersonating Lady Chilcote's husband. (Shades of Princess Flavia in 'Zenda'.) Meanwhile, Loder (still pretending to be Chilcote) is utterly cold to Chilcote's mistress Lady Joyce, much to her bafflement.
SPOILERS COMING. Sir John dies of his addiction, without this becoming public knowledge. Brock persuades Loder to abandon his own life and become Sir John Chilcote permanently, appropriating Chilcote's wealth and reputation. Of course, this means that Loder will now be married to Lady Chilcote. Hmmm...
'The Masquerader' is not very plausible, yet it's quite enjoyable. Ronald Colman gives two distinctly different performances in the lookalike roles... although his turn as the drug-addicted Chilcote is a bit too overwrought. Moss Hart's smooth dialogue papers over some of the cracks in the plot line. Gregg Toland's photography is up to his usual high standard, and I was especially impressed by the scenes in which both Ronald Colmans are on screen at the same go. (Most dual-role movies made during this period featured flat sideline lighting during the double-exposure sequences; Toland avoids this.) Also well-photographed is a night sequence in Hyde Park (filmed on the Goldwyn Studio's backlot); Toland keeps the lighting bright enough for us to see the action, but dark enough to minimise the obvious fakery of the scenery. Creighton Hale is good in a small role. In the role of Lady Eve Chilcote, Elissa Landi is appropriately patrician (and slightly less blonde than usual), but her performance is weak. In the role of Lady Joyce, Juliette Compton is so dull and unattractive that I had difficulty believing Sir John would ever prefer her to his wife. The studio reconstruction of the House of Commons is a lot more convincing than I expected it to be, especially for a Yank film. I'll rate this movie 8 out of 10.
There's no question but that "The Masquerader" is dated. This 1933 movie is set in a London contemporaneous with the era in which it was filmed and portrays a highly stratified social milieu that has all but disappeared in the intervening eight decades; one is almost surprised that the constable at the doors of the House of Commons doesn't pull his forelock as he addresses the parliamentarians who emerge. But the movie is nimbly and deftly made and features both good acting in its principal and secondary roles and sure direction by Richard Wallace. Portraying both the dissolute Sir John Chilcote and his identical cousin John Loder, Ronald Colman is afforded the opportunity to display both his louche and noble sides (qualities he was to exploit to greater advantage in "A Tale of Two Cities" made two years later) and Colman makes the most of it. He's ably assisted here by Elissa Landi, Juliette Compton and the ubiquitous Halliwell Hobbes (playing his faithful, if long-suffering manservant, Brock). And, really, it's the acting that makes this movie come to life; in the hands of lesser thespians the much-used plot and only serviceable dialogue would begin to display the threadbare attributes of the cinematically shop-worn. But good acting always has the ability to move us... or it should. The joy that Colman's and Landi's characters feel when the expected but nonetheless surprising ending to "The Masquerader" rolls 'round is palpable and -- in a cool, present-day cinematic era when highly charged emotion is regarded as somewhat suspect -- refreshing.
Did you know
- ConnectionsReferenced in Agent spécial (1935)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Njegova senka
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 20m(80 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content