Le roman d'un Roi

Expensive silent film of a king who is marked for assassination. He switches identities with a look alike (both played by Lewis Stone) who takes his place at his coronation. But the real king is kidnapped. While his followers try to find him, the fake king falls in love with Princess Flava (Alice Terry).

Slow moving but the film looks great. No action...just lots of exagerrated looks and people endlessly talking. The sets, costumes and acting helps. Seeing Stone (who went on to play Judge Hardy in the Andy Hardy movies) so young and being a romantic lead is interesting. He's also very good. Terry is regal and also very good as the princess. Ramon Novarro (still an unknown) plays the evil villain. That's quite a shock--he always played heroes in his later films. He pulls it off though.

So, it's beautiful but I can't totally recommend it.

Rex Ingram was one of the finest directors of the silent era, but unfortunately, he is little remembered today. His most famous film is The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, a box office smash in 1920 which put Italian immigrant Rudolph Valentino on the road to full-blown stardom. This 1922 adaptation of The Prisoner of Zenda is one of his better known films among silent movie geeks, but I would not count it among his most outstanding.

There's good scenery and spectacle, and Lewis Stone makes good as the lead. The standout of the cast is without a doubt a young Ramon Novarro as the roguish Rupert of Hentzau. Unfortunately, the rest of the cast is not so memorable. The film is also overlong and the comic relief was mildly painful at best.

Overall, it's watchable, but you'll be better served by watching the 1937 remake. If you want outstanding Ingram, then see Scaramouche or Four Horsemen.

As with "Scaramouche", I found this film rather stodgy, with a lacklustre score. Lewis Stone is too old in his dual role and Alice Terry lacked any real charm. This picture belongs to its supporting cast- Barbara LaMarr ("too beautiful for her own good") as Antoinette de Mauban, Colonel Zapt, Captain von Tarlenheim and,of course, Rupert of Hentzau, played with relish and humour by Ramon Novarro. I think I prefer him in this role to any other I have seen him portray; perhaps his popularity with the female audience meant he became stuck in the part of gentle romancer (long after he had become too mature for this) rather than developing his abilities as an actor.

I've seen both Rex Ingram's "Scaramouche" and "The Prisoner of Zenda" and by far "Scaramouche" the more entertaining film. This film though, was very fascinating. Lewis Stone acquits himself well as the hero/drukand king and swordfights quite well. Alice Terry made a very beautiful princess. Ramon Novarro played the monocled villain, somewhat unintentionally funny. Barbara La Marr, the closeups of her face, wow! Seeing Valentino's "cousins" from "The Four Horseman of the Acapolyse" in supporting roles was really cool.

However, the Colman/Fairbanks Jr. version is far superior.

Can you imagine the perpetually tired Lewis Stone in The Prisoner of Zenda? He has to play the senior advisor to the king, right? He's far too old and patriarchal to play the lead. . . So one would think. Well, in 1922, Lew was neither old, fatherly, nor tired. He played the dual leads, and he was given a brown wig! Full of energy, wonderful expressions to communicate to the audience without words, and the ability to both perform stunts and woo a fair maiden, Lew takes charge and acts like a leading man.

If you've never seen any of the movie versions or read the book, the story is very exciting. Just before a king's coronation, his evil brother plans to drug and kidnap him so that he can't be crowned the king. However, the king's faithful aides find a lookalike, completely by accident, and get him to impersonate the king during the coronation! If you've seen the modern-day comedy Dave, starring Kevin Kline, you'll have a basic understanding of the story.

I've seen three versions of this movie, and while the 1937 version is the best, this one is extremely impressive. It's amazing to see what Hollywood was capable of in 1922: the costumes, the sets, the elaborate action scenes with moats, drawbridges, and swordfights. At almost two hours, this is a lengthy silent movie, and there are quite a lot of title cards for you to read, but if you know the story, you won't be lost. Those who don't like silent movies will be incredibly bored, but if you like the change of pace and different way of storytelling, this is one worth watching, if only to see what Lewis Stone looks like with brown hair. It doesn't feel like it was made so early in the decade; if it had a 1928 timestamp on it, I'd believe it.