IMDb RATING
6.7/10
921
YOUR RATING
When Laurel visits Hardy at home, hi-jinx occur and the Mrs. orders them out. They go to a golf course where they try to impress two young ladies and wind up in a mud-slinging fight with oth... Read allWhen Laurel visits Hardy at home, hi-jinx occur and the Mrs. orders them out. They go to a golf course where they try to impress two young ladies and wind up in a mud-slinging fight with other golfers.When Laurel visits Hardy at home, hi-jinx occur and the Mrs. orders them out. They go to a golf course where they try to impress two young ladies and wind up in a mud-slinging fight with other golfers.
Edgar Kennedy
- Golfer
- (uncredited)
John Aasen
- Very Tall Golfer
- (uncredited)
Chet Brandenburg
- Caddie
- (uncredited)
Dorothy Coburn
- Muddy Combatant
- (uncredited)
Kay Deslys
- Mrs. Hardy
- (uncredited)
Clara Guiol
- Golfer
- (uncredited)
Charlie Hall
- Soda Jerk
- (uncredited)
Jack Hill
- Muddy Combatant
- (uncredited)
Sam Lufkin
- Shop Manager
- (uncredited)
Edna Marion
- Blonde Girlfriend
- (uncredited)
Viola Richard
- Brunette Girlfriend
- (uncredited)
Lyle Tayo
- Lady Golfer
- (uncredited)
Featured reviews
Laurel and Hardy's screen characters were still taking shape when this silent comedy was made, and the framework of their relationship wasn't yet complete. They are friends in this one, but Stan's a friend that Ollie would rather avoid, and they haven't yet adopted the trademark bowler hats and slightly shoddy suits. Ollie pretends he's not home when Stan comes calling, but manages to mess that up so that he and his wife are forced to let him in the house. Wifey is so incensed by Stan's antics that she sends the boys off to play golf, which leads to further typical chaos.
This isn't one of the duo's best shorts but it has a few decent moments. I liked the way Ollie's gramophone player fell apart when he attempted to play it the 'wrong way,' and this film shows the first example of the boys using their routine about not having enough money to pay for soda with their girlfriends which they re-worked in a later film. It's perhaps true that the introduction of sound is what transformed Laurel & Hardy into a truly first class comedy act, which is why this short isn't quite up to the standard of their later work.
This isn't one of the duo's best shorts but it has a few decent moments. I liked the way Ollie's gramophone player fell apart when he attempted to play it the 'wrong way,' and this film shows the first example of the boys using their routine about not having enough money to pay for soda with their girlfriends which they re-worked in a later film. It's perhaps true that the introduction of sound is what transformed Laurel & Hardy into a truly first class comedy act, which is why this short isn't quite up to the standard of their later work.
This was a rather disappointing silent comedy short from Laurel & Hardy. It by no means is a horrible or bad movie but the movie is too simple constructed and lacks some true creativity or humor to consider this an above average Laurel & Hardy short.
The movie starts of really slow and only really begins to take pace from the moment the boys enter the golf course. However also in that part of the movie it keeps lacking in some true creativity or remarkable comedy moments. The movie doesn't have any real laughs in it, although it's still perfectly fun to watch all of course. Laurel's & Hardy's antics never get boring to watch.
The only thing that makes this movie stand it is the end sequence which basically consists out of one big mud fight, involving the boys, their lady friends, their rival and a whole bunch of innocent bystanders. It's always fun to see a good old fashioned mud fight. It's simple, it's corny but it just never gets tiresome or unfunny to watch.
It's interesting to see Laurel & Hardy in one of the early teaming-ups and how the characters developed throughout the years. There also are a bunch of other regular Laurel & Hardy actors present in this movie such as; Dorothy Coburn, Jack Hill and Edgar Kennedy, who normally mainly plays cop roles.
This movie as a whole doesn't stand out as the best, most original or enjoyable Laurel & Hardy silent comedy shorts, although it still is a certainly watchable one.
6/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
The movie starts of really slow and only really begins to take pace from the moment the boys enter the golf course. However also in that part of the movie it keeps lacking in some true creativity or remarkable comedy moments. The movie doesn't have any real laughs in it, although it's still perfectly fun to watch all of course. Laurel's & Hardy's antics never get boring to watch.
The only thing that makes this movie stand it is the end sequence which basically consists out of one big mud fight, involving the boys, their lady friends, their rival and a whole bunch of innocent bystanders. It's always fun to see a good old fashioned mud fight. It's simple, it's corny but it just never gets tiresome or unfunny to watch.
It's interesting to see Laurel & Hardy in one of the early teaming-ups and how the characters developed throughout the years. There also are a bunch of other regular Laurel & Hardy actors present in this movie such as; Dorothy Coburn, Jack Hill and Edgar Kennedy, who normally mainly plays cop roles.
This movie as a whole doesn't stand out as the best, most original or enjoyable Laurel & Hardy silent comedy shorts, although it still is a certainly watchable one.
6/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy were comedic geniuses, individually and together, and their partnership was deservedly iconic and one of the best there was. They left behind a large body of work, a vast majority of it being entertaining to classic comedy, at their best they were hilarious and their best efforts were great examples of how to do comedy without being juvenile or distasteful.
While not classic Laurel and Hardy, later films, short and feature, had stronger chemistry when fully formed and used their considerable talents better, 'Should Married Men Go Home?' is enjoyable fun. Not one of their best from their 1928 output but it is an improvement on their previous effort. In some of their previous work, Laurel was much funnier and more interesting while Hardy in most of the previous outings had too little to do. 'Should Married Men Go Home?' is good, is far from a misfire and feels like a Laurel and Hardy short rather than a short featuring them.
'Should Married Men Go Home?' is flimsy in story, and doesn't feel quite enough for the short's length.
The rest of the characters are not as interesting and the momentum at the start isn't as lively as once we get to the golf course.
Laurel however is very funny, and sometimes hilarious. It is wonderful seeing Hardy having more to do and he is on Laurel's level. The chemistry is certainly much more here than in previous outings of theirs, namely because there's more of them together and it was starting to feel like a partnership. Support is nice if not as inspired.
Both Laurel and Hardy have great moments, especially the climactic mud-slinging fight which is one of the boys' funniest moments of their early work. The record and drug-store sequences are also terrific.
A good deal of the humour is well timed, hugely energetic and very funny if not always hilarious, with everything going at a lively pace and there is a lot of charm and good nature to keep one going. It looks good too and is competently directed.
On the whole, pretty good and enjoyable. 7/10 Bethany Cox
While not classic Laurel and Hardy, later films, short and feature, had stronger chemistry when fully formed and used their considerable talents better, 'Should Married Men Go Home?' is enjoyable fun. Not one of their best from their 1928 output but it is an improvement on their previous effort. In some of their previous work, Laurel was much funnier and more interesting while Hardy in most of the previous outings had too little to do. 'Should Married Men Go Home?' is good, is far from a misfire and feels like a Laurel and Hardy short rather than a short featuring them.
'Should Married Men Go Home?' is flimsy in story, and doesn't feel quite enough for the short's length.
The rest of the characters are not as interesting and the momentum at the start isn't as lively as once we get to the golf course.
Laurel however is very funny, and sometimes hilarious. It is wonderful seeing Hardy having more to do and he is on Laurel's level. The chemistry is certainly much more here than in previous outings of theirs, namely because there's more of them together and it was starting to feel like a partnership. Support is nice if not as inspired.
Both Laurel and Hardy have great moments, especially the climactic mud-slinging fight which is one of the boys' funniest moments of their early work. The record and drug-store sequences are also terrific.
A good deal of the humour is well timed, hugely energetic and very funny if not always hilarious, with everything going at a lively pace and there is a lot of charm and good nature to keep one going. It looks good too and is competently directed.
On the whole, pretty good and enjoyable. 7/10 Bethany Cox
Now, I was not familiar with this 1928 short silent comedy movie titled "Should Married Men Go Home?" starring Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy prior to sitting down here in 2025 to watch it for the first time.
Writers Leo McCarey, James Parrott, H. M. Walker, Oliver Hardy and Stan Laurel put together a funny and entertaining script and storyline. It starts out innocently, but once Stan and Oliver hits the golf course, chaos ensures. And it was a wonderful slapstick comedy.
Of course you know what you are getting with Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy in the leading roles.
"Should Married Men Go Home?" is a genuinely funny movie and well-worth watching especially if you enjoy the good old comedy from this timeless comedy duo.
My rating of directors James Parrott and Leo McCarey's 1928 "Should Married Men Go Home?" lands on a six out of ten stars.
Writers Leo McCarey, James Parrott, H. M. Walker, Oliver Hardy and Stan Laurel put together a funny and entertaining script and storyline. It starts out innocently, but once Stan and Oliver hits the golf course, chaos ensures. And it was a wonderful slapstick comedy.
Of course you know what you are getting with Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy in the leading roles.
"Should Married Men Go Home?" is a genuinely funny movie and well-worth watching especially if you enjoy the good old comedy from this timeless comedy duo.
My rating of directors James Parrott and Leo McCarey's 1928 "Should Married Men Go Home?" lands on a six out of ten stars.
Having just watched and reviewed The Finishing Touch, the next short on my Laurel & Hardy chronological list should be From Soup to Nuts, but since I already reviewed that-as well as the next two after that, You're Darn Tootin' and Their Purple Moment, under my previous username tavm, I'm now commenting on Should Married Men Go Home? In this one, Ollie and his wife are having a nice Sunday rest when Stan comes by. Hoping to avoid him, they try to not make any noise but the jig is up. The two men then go for a round of golf and encounter a couple of ladies who they pair with since only foursomes are allowed on this day. Also along is Edgar Kennedy who tries to stay calm but around those boys, you know that won't last long, that's for sure! I'll stop there and just say this was one of the funniest of the silent L & H shorts. I especially liked that early example of a "short on money, one should refuse" bit that was later also done in the talkie Men O'War. And the end tops it all! So that's a high recommendation of Should Married Men Go Home?
Did you know
- GoofsUpon arriving at the golf course there is a sign clearly stating that only foursomes are allowed to play today - so why was Edgar Kennedy seemingly playing by himself?
- ConnectionsEdited into La rencontre de Laurel et Hardy (1967)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Follow Through
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime20 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content