'49-'17

102 years after its original release, I was impressed by this feature, that was tightly directed by talented Ruth Ann Baldwin. Based on "The Old West Per Contract", a short story written by William Wallace Hook (who wrote several science-fiction novels), the frame story is quite original: in 1917 a judge wants to revive his happy days as a gold prospector, during the gold rush of 1849, and orders his secretary to stage a fake Old West town where he can spend his last days. However, the following events are a string of common places usually found in the melodrama genre, spiced with lust and greed. Fortunately Baldwin handles the whole show with energy, stages many outdoor scenes, and adds a welcome dose of humor and villainous actions provided by Jean Hersholt as the baddie. I found interesting how life and death are treated in this film, compared to movies of these days. This has nothing to do with the movie, it is just a reflection of mine, after watching how the script avoids acts of extreme violence or killing the characters. It seems as if life had more value in those cinematic days, and I hope that we come back to reason and start respecting other people's lives. Watch it.

A judge "out East" misses the days of his youth out west and hires a man to go out and find actors who will populate the old deserted town he once lived in. The man he sends ends up in San Diego (excellent scenery in the pigeon feeding scenes) and happens upon an old west show that is failing dismally. They are ready to take the judge up on his offer to populate "Nugget Notch" and the story goes from there.

Wildly improbable coincedences, an old mystery cleared up and on and on. Some of the story will have you scratching your head in confusion.

Nice diversion for a late night's viewing though. Early western by a rare woman director. Recommended marginally.

As many other reviewers noticed, the movie is full of cliches and some continuity errors especially relating to the age of the characters. Indeed the title is '49-'17, so some characters should be much older than you see in the movie. I wondered if the "49" might be related not to the real year, but to a sense of "westerness" as identity that the judge feels. I mention this because in "Roughing it" by Twain, "real" western people (he writes in the 1870s) define themselves as fortyniners - and shun the tender-feet who just emigrated... however the title kind of points out they literally meant the judge had been out west in 1849, in which case... the movies wasn't really so deeply thought of...

However, I strangely found it enjoyable. It was described as a parody, which some people doubt. I did think some scenes were indeed to funny to be intended seriously. I will not fully spoiler even a movie like this, but one characters uses gold nuggets as stones to chase a wolf away and he does not realize they are not simple rocks.

The story is weak or rather forces some deep suspension of disbelief. In any case it was a fun watch.

The plot of "'49-'17" is as bad as its unfortunate title, and it betrays a poor sense of time. The action takes place primarily in modern times (1917) with flashbacks to the Gold Rush of 1849 (hence the title), with most of the main characters present in both eras. Unfortunately, the main characters (who were already adults in 1849) have only aged about forty years by 1917, whilst Peggy Bobbett (who was only an infant in 1849) looks to be only about twenty years old in 1917.

In 1849, J.R. Brand and his partner Bob Adams went prospecting in California, accompanied by Adams's wife Beatrice and their infant daughter Lorena. But Beatrice died and Lorena Adams disappeared. A few days later, near the mining camp of Nugget Notch, Brand strikes it rich in the goldfields. He feels obligated to share his new fortune with Adams, but is temporarily unable to do so.

Fade in to 1917. Brand has invested his own and Adams's wealth wisely, and he's now a respected retired judge. Nugget Notch is now a ghost town. Brand buys the town and populates it with the cast of a bankrupt wild-west show. Bankrolled by Brand, Nugget Notch is now a tourist attraction, recreating a sanitised version of Gold Rush days. The town attracts the attention of "Gentleman Jim" Raynor, a crooked gambler. (Raynor is played by Jean Hersholt, an actor who is still fondly remembered for his philanthropic activities offscreen, but who usually played slimy villains. In this film he plays one of his slimiest roles.)

Brand hopes to locate Lorena Adams (who must be an adult by now) so that he can give her the fortune which Brand feels belonged to her father. The infant Lorena was found by the homespun couple the Bobbetts, who named her Peggy and raised her as their own child. Peggy Bobbett has no memory of her past life as Lorena Adams. (Why don't they just call her Lorena Bobbett?)

Eventually, Raynor learns the truth about Lorena, and he blackmails the Bobbett family, threatening to expose their daughter Peggy's true identity. (It's not clear why they should seek to conceal this, especially as Lorena Adams is an heiress.) When the blackmail scam fails, Raynor decides to rob the town hall. The film degenerates into incoherent chases and showdowns.

I really wanted to like this film, but it makes no sense and has many lapses in logic ... not least the fact that the characters age inconsistently, and none of them age plausibly. The film looks as if it was shot without a script, and then the dialogue and intertitles were written afterwards in an attempt to create a storyline for the footage. In fact, many silent films (mostly bad ones) were created this way. Thar's not much gold in these hyar hills. Too bad.

I've just watched this on the "Pioneers: First Women Filmmakers" release and I have to say I found it really enjoyable. Yes it predictable, but it's not the first and won't be the last. But it was enjoyable. I especially liked Donna Drew, she was delightful to watch and it is sad that she didn't live for much longer to make more films, I think she was excellent in this one.

Some of the reviews on here are very negative, but they are old, so perhaps some of their confusions or concerns may be solved with this newer restored version. I wouldn't call this a western, in its true sense of the genre, but it is mostly set out in the west and there are the goods guys and the bed ones too, but it was more a moralistic tale.

I think with this new release this film can be seen as it is meant to be and I for one really enjoyed it.