In this adaptation of the award-winning podcast, Slow Burn's Leon Neyfakh excavates the strange subplots and forgotten characters of recent political history.In this adaptation of the award-winning podcast, Slow Burn's Leon Neyfakh excavates the strange subplots and forgotten characters of recent political history.In this adaptation of the award-winning podcast, Slow Burn's Leon Neyfakh excavates the strange subplots and forgotten characters of recent political history.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
EDITED: Enjoying this doc, but parts of it esp. In Episode 3 completely gloss over some key historical truths: 1) The US under the Kennedy administration attempted to assassinate Castro several times 2) Castro was leading a revolution against US imperialism 3) Cuba, when under US colonial power, was a playground for the rich ruling elite, at the expense of the Cuban people 4) The US has interfered in foreign elections, thwarting democracy, many times up to this present time 5) Castro was not leading during peace time but fighting for the very lives of the Cuban workers; when fighting a revolution and establishing a new revolutionary government, you can't just "hold elections;" because the working class has seized power and needs to hold on to that power. Otherwise, it will just become a colonial state again. . . . Also re: McGovern: McGovern had support because of his courageous anti-war stance, and that was different from any other candidates for primaries; the US violence against Vietnam escalated under Nixon, and was abominable; and I'm on episode 3 and have yet to see Kissinger, architect of dastardly US war crimes, mentioned. Also re: Mrs. Mitchell, I doubt most people thought being a "southern belle" was "cool" during the black revolution of the 1960's, which was crushed by US/ CIA. That was an odd description to add in this doc, although Martha Mitchell's courage and willingness to talk to the press was admirable and history has vindicated her suspicions.
Also I don't recall the Pentagon Papers being mentioned, which was the whole reason that the first Watergate break-in took place; to discredit Daniel Ellsberg.
Also I don't recall the Pentagon Papers being mentioned, which was the whole reason that the first Watergate break-in took place; to discredit Daniel Ellsberg.
This was tedious from the start. Why in the world do we have aging cheerleaders on screen? Unwatchable.
Can't wait for the next episode. Sometimes it's hard to evaluate what would become historical events as they unfold in real time. This series presents the onion very well and unwraps each layer with care and details that we have either forgotten or never knew. A number of participants who were involved at the time are presented as they are today to add the facts they knew at the time. Excellent overall.
Doing exactly what a documentary should do:
If all issues were dealt with in a similar fashion - many of us would be more enlightened. The narrative keeps the Slow Burn vivid.
An obvious must se for anybody with an interest in; Americana, Nixon, Ethics or Politics.
- Presenting facts as facts
- Presenting theories as theories
- Digging deeper, or differently, than anyone before.
If all issues were dealt with in a similar fashion - many of us would be more enlightened. The narrative keeps the Slow Burn vivid.
An obvious must se for anybody with an interest in; Americana, Nixon, Ethics or Politics.
I don't usually write reviews but I had to for this docuseries. It is one of the best shows about politics period. It has all the elements of a great politics show and if you like politics and history you will love it. If you think you know the watergate scandal the think again.
Details
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content