A game ranger and a team of poachers end up surrounded by zombie animals and they forge an alliance to stop the beasts before the super-zombie virus spreads to the entire world.A game ranger and a team of poachers end up surrounded by zombie animals and they forge an alliance to stop the beasts before the super-zombie virus spreads to the entire world.A game ranger and a team of poachers end up surrounded by zombie animals and they forge an alliance to stop the beasts before the super-zombie virus spreads to the entire world.
Terra Strong Lyons
- Jezel
- (as Terra Strong)
Troy Castaneda
- Ranger Mike
- (as Troy 'Taz' Castaneda)
Brandon Baker
- Vedder
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
There's no way around it. This is one terrible movie.
Special effects are laughable and incredibly cheap looking and unconvincing. Actors do their best with a terrible script. The women are pretty and they wear tight clothes that show lots of cleavage. So if you're a 12 year old boy that can't access porn on your computer, I guess you might like this.
Special effects are laughable and incredibly cheap looking and unconvincing. Actors do their best with a terrible script. The women are pretty and they wear tight clothes that show lots of cleavage. So if you're a 12 year old boy that can't access porn on your computer, I guess you might like this.
Jesus IV never seen the first movie but got as far as the rhinos and decided I must leave 1 start the storyline and actors are okay but the animations the graphics are absolutely horrible the dudes was running across that field like 5 minutes the rhinos zig zagging took much longer and then the simp can't even hold a fkn handrail and the splat was the best part of the movie again fake as hell did you ever watch the old movies such as Jason and the Argonauts think it's 70a or 80s graphics are ten times better than all in this movie haha if you don't have the stunts the correct graphic designers and make up artists to create a proper quality in 2020 please get a new job movie probably would have been great if they didn't add such fake bs but instead had actors in high quality outfits and a few camera tricks and a drone for decent shots I understand it's low budget movie but it's your TECH dude that destroyed it and director for allowing such bad affects lol.
Same basic premise as the first movie: zombie animals run amok.
Like the first one, the setting is good and I think the actors did a fair job with what they had to work with. The science still makes no sense, but the story in this one made a little more sense. The CGI is equally poor.
What makes this one a tick better is that there were at least a few interesting animal attack scenes, one of which thankfully saw the demise of a truly obnoxious character.
Like the first one, the setting is good and I think the actors did a fair job with what they had to work with. The science still makes no sense, but the story in this one made a little more sense. The CGI is equally poor.
What makes this one a tick better is that there were at least a few interesting animal attack scenes, one of which thankfully saw the demise of a truly obnoxious character.
Well, the 2016 "Zoombies" was hardly a masterpiece in any sense, and fairly much came and went without as much as a groan or taking a bite of the zombie genre. So it was no surprise that the 2019 "Zoombies 2" pretty much did the same.
I stumbled upon this The Asylum production by sheer random luck. I have seen the previous movie, so of course I would also see this sequel. However, I can't really claim to sit down to watch it with much of any hope or expectations to it.
Turns out that it was as one would assume a zombie sequel would fare. Yeah, it was worse than the predecessor, and that leaves little to be said actually.
The storyline in "Zoombies 2" was straight forward, for sure. But it was essentially a pointless and incredibly mundane and generic storyline, one that has already been seen before many, many, many times over in other zombie movies. So don't get your hopes up for anything grand here.
The acting in the movie was adequate, if you take into consideration the type of movie it was, and the fact that The Asylum was behind this movie. However, I can't claim to be able to put my finger on any single performance that stood out amidst the others. So it was fairly bland and non-distinct.
For a zombie movie, then "Zoombies 2" was incredibly bland and actually downright boring. The zombified animals were horrible to look at, and it was painstakingly clear that it was just poorly animated CGI that looked like something you'd find in a 1990s computer game.
I gave up just about 20 minutes short of reaching the end of the movie. I was ready to have one of those atrociously fake and horribly animated zombie animals come and claw my eyes out. The movie was just not worth the effort.
I stumbled upon this The Asylum production by sheer random luck. I have seen the previous movie, so of course I would also see this sequel. However, I can't really claim to sit down to watch it with much of any hope or expectations to it.
Turns out that it was as one would assume a zombie sequel would fare. Yeah, it was worse than the predecessor, and that leaves little to be said actually.
The storyline in "Zoombies 2" was straight forward, for sure. But it was essentially a pointless and incredibly mundane and generic storyline, one that has already been seen before many, many, many times over in other zombie movies. So don't get your hopes up for anything grand here.
The acting in the movie was adequate, if you take into consideration the type of movie it was, and the fact that The Asylum was behind this movie. However, I can't claim to be able to put my finger on any single performance that stood out amidst the others. So it was fairly bland and non-distinct.
For a zombie movie, then "Zoombies 2" was incredibly bland and actually downright boring. The zombified animals were horrible to look at, and it was painstakingly clear that it was just poorly animated CGI that looked like something you'd find in a 1990s computer game.
I gave up just about 20 minutes short of reaching the end of the movie. I was ready to have one of those atrociously fake and horribly animated zombie animals come and claw my eyes out. The movie was just not worth the effort.
Given Asylums reputation for creating average, at best, films for a quick buck, I wasn't expecting anything special from a Zoombies sequel. I was right, because surprisingly enough this turned out to even worse than the first film.
This is apparently meant to be a prequel explaining the origins of the Zoombies, even though it's a lazy recycling of the first films plot. A group of poachers break into an animal refuge to steal some animals, using a strange green fluid as a tranquilizer. But little do they know, the "tranquilizer" turns animals into vicious, undead, flesh-eating monsters. Now, a team of sanctuary workers and a few poachers must band together in order to survive.
The excessive CGI animal effects look as hilariously cheap as ever. There were even two stampede scenes where the crew obviously copied and pasted the same animal models over and over. Other "special" effects were just as ridiculous, like JD (Jumarcus Mason) being launched into the air by a hippo, he's obviously in a sitting position placed over a green screen. Next, we see him being devoured by the hippo a horribly rendered CG scene that looked like it came from an early PS1 game. It looked so bad; it made my eyes burn.
As expected, the acting is terrible, and the dialogue is mediocre at best. They even rip-off a line from Aliens: "Vedder, we are leaving!". This happened to be Erica Sturdefants and Jumarcus Masons most prominent roles. Most of the characters are flat and forgettable, hardly differing from one another, and only appear in a few scenes before becoming Zoombie food. The only marginally notable character is Jezel (Terra Strong). I honestly didn't care for any of them because all their performances are so stale and unconvincing, even during action scenes.
The action and horror aspects of this film were almost completely ineffective. Seriously, who would ever be afraid of killer meerkats, aardvarks, and porcupines? Just like in the first movie, all the effects are so awful, they won'tscare anyone. The death scenes are laughably lazy; twice we see victims just lay on their backs and don't even try to fight back as the Zoombies sit on their chests and dismember them.
Like the majority of "The Asylum's" work, this was an awful and barely watchable movie.
This is apparently meant to be a prequel explaining the origins of the Zoombies, even though it's a lazy recycling of the first films plot. A group of poachers break into an animal refuge to steal some animals, using a strange green fluid as a tranquilizer. But little do they know, the "tranquilizer" turns animals into vicious, undead, flesh-eating monsters. Now, a team of sanctuary workers and a few poachers must band together in order to survive.
The excessive CGI animal effects look as hilariously cheap as ever. There were even two stampede scenes where the crew obviously copied and pasted the same animal models over and over. Other "special" effects were just as ridiculous, like JD (Jumarcus Mason) being launched into the air by a hippo, he's obviously in a sitting position placed over a green screen. Next, we see him being devoured by the hippo a horribly rendered CG scene that looked like it came from an early PS1 game. It looked so bad; it made my eyes burn.
As expected, the acting is terrible, and the dialogue is mediocre at best. They even rip-off a line from Aliens: "Vedder, we are leaving!". This happened to be Erica Sturdefants and Jumarcus Masons most prominent roles. Most of the characters are flat and forgettable, hardly differing from one another, and only appear in a few scenes before becoming Zoombie food. The only marginally notable character is Jezel (Terra Strong). I honestly didn't care for any of them because all their performances are so stale and unconvincing, even during action scenes.
The action and horror aspects of this film were almost completely ineffective. Seriously, who would ever be afraid of killer meerkats, aardvarks, and porcupines? Just like in the first movie, all the effects are so awful, they won'tscare anyone. The death scenes are laughably lazy; twice we see victims just lay on their backs and don't even try to fight back as the Zoombies sit on their chests and dismember them.
Like the majority of "The Asylum's" work, this was an awful and barely watchable movie.
Did you know
- TriviaAll entries contain spoilers
- GoofsWhen the hippo is stalking K.D., Toronto and Randy, it's eyes are normal. When it's attacking them, the hippo has the white zoombie eyes. In the shot where the hippo swims away from them, the eyes are normal again.
- Crazy creditsAfter the credits, you can first hear a lion roar. Then a picture of Titan, the lion is shown. The film is dedicated to his memory.
- ConnectionsFollows Zoombies (2016)
- SoundtracksBlue Angel
Written by Guy Thomas and Arlene Matza-Jackson
- How long is Zoombies 2?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Зоозомби 2
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $100,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 24m(84 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content