Les Voleurs de la nuit

This not the worst movie I've seen. So anyone throwing a 1 or a 2 at it is likely taking themselves a little too seriously. Likewise, it is not great or maybe even good so anyone throwing a 6 or more is invested in the movie's success or else just tolerates mediocre much better than I do.

This is not a lot of action. Not a lot of thriller. And the only real sci-fi does not make a lot of sense. You will likely have a hard time actually caring about the characters and an even harder time remaining interested in the outcome. And then when it happens you'll wish it hadn't because you will realize your investment in the payoff didn't earn much.

Other than that though, excellent movie. Watch it yourself if you don't believe me.

There are reviewers who are going to say this movie is dull, boring, mediocre, no thrill or action, are probably just watching the wrong movie. Or at the very least got the wrong idea. While it's true the movie is not filled with action, it does have a decent story. So if you decide to watch the movie just be prepared.

Yes, I know this film is a bit lo-fi, yet the acting leads are superb, the story a bit too believable--especially in terms of recently uncovered nightmares of Indian schools, and the malicious tech right on target. Was there a bit too much left from he editing room intact: YES. But some of these actors probably worked their whole lives to get into a wide-distribution release. I appreciated the film on many levels and would hope other viewers would as well.

Night Raiders is a dystopian science-fiction film that serves as analogy to portray the horrors of residential schools for First Nations throughout Canada. The film was written and directed by Danis Goluet, a young woman of Cree and Metis origins from La Ronge, Saskatchewan. The movie also features numerous First Nation actresses and actors which makes for an authentic result. However, this ambitious film suffers from its extremely slow pace and strange conclusion that asks more questions than it actually answers.

The story revolves around single mother Niska and her young teenage daughter Waseese who are living in a camper in an isolated forest somewhere in the Canadian North. However, the totalitarian government expects every child to be sent to boarding schools starting at age four. That's why the government is using drones to discover children who have not been sent to those schools and their parents who are disobeying the law. One day, Waseese gets injured while hunting in the woods and needs medical help. Niska and her daughter have to get to a nearby city to get help but they soon get tracked down by drones and Niska has to give her daughter up. Instead of returning to the security of the woods or taking the opportunity to make it out of that horrible place with fake identity papers, Niska joins a group of First Nation guerillas who are kidnapping First Nation children from the boarding schools and hopes to rescue her own daughter.

This film convinces on a few levels. First of all, the locations have been chosen with care from the endless wilderness in the north as opposed to the poor, dirty and destroyed ghettos in the south and the cold boarding schools that look like prisons. Up next, the elements honouring First Nation cultures such as colourful clothing or dynamic chants have been incorporated with great care into the movie. Some of the acting performances are also very good and especially Brooklyn Letexier-Hart as resilient teenage daughter stands out as the film's greatest actress.

On the other side, this movie isn't without its flaws. First and foremost, the movie has extremely slow pace despite a rather short running time. The entire movie could have been shown in a sixty-minute episode of a dystopian television series such as Black Mirror. Up next, the movie offers few information regarding the background of the totalitarian regime and its ultimate goals as the dystopian world only seems to serve as an analogy related to the horrors First Nation members had to endure throughout the past centuries. Finally, the movie ends on a supernatural note that doesn't blend in with the rest of the film and comes as an odd twist that will leave most viewers scratching their heads. The ending refers to elements of magic that are present in many First Nation tales but this transition is poorly done in this movie and doesn't lead to a proper conclusion.

At the end of the day, Night Raiders is only interesting for those who deeply care about First Nation cultures, identities and issues. The idea behind the movie is very positive but the final result has too many flaws to make for a truly enjoyable cinematic experience. This film suffers from slow pace, weak plot and unsatisfactory resolution. There are other contemporary films dealing with First Nation and Inuit issues such as Indian Horse or The Grizzlies that are much better than Night Raiders.

This is not a complete waste of time, howevver, there are better ways to use this time(wash dishes, fold clothes, look at moonlight), all of which may be less boring.

The initial story is interesting, especially for those who watched Children of Men, which is absolutely fantastic. That movie had some action, some thriller, story drama, compelling ending, great acting and you cared about the characters. This one has interesting concept, decent acting and.......nothing else. It appears the director is the writer who had an idea but needed someone else flesh out the story. It is extremely boring, you never really care what happens to anyone, and a tacked-on afterthought as an ending.

It did do one thing...made me go rewatch Children of Men.