Eminence Hill

Has nudity and sex scenes. This is not a movie for children.

This film is pretty well acted and intense. The profanity is gratuitous, excessive, and extreme; really feels out of place in a western. It seems that today's movie makers believe they have an obligation to use as many obscenities as possible. If the profanity were to be cut out, the film would probably be half an hour shorter. Still an intense movie with good performances. Keeps you watching.

I had the chance to sit down and watch the 2019 Western movie "Eminence Hill" here in 2021, as I stumbled upon the movie by sheer, random chance. And seeing that the movie's cover had Lance Henriksen, Barry Corbin and Dominique Swain on the cover, I must say that I was interested in seeing it, especially because of Lance Henriksen.

The storyline told in "Eminence Hill", as written by Robert Conway and Owen Conway, was actually adequate. It wasn't a movie that had me overly impressed. But I will say that I was adequately entertained by what the movie turned out to be.

However, Lance Henriksen was in the movie for maybe a full minute or so. So having him on the movie's cover was just an awful way of luring people in to watching it with putting a familiar face there. Hey, it worked. I picked the movie up, didn't I?

Director Robert Conway managed to make the movie feel like an old fashioned Western, so that was definitely something that worked in favor of the movie.

While "Eminence Hill" was a watchable movie, it was hardly an outstanding or memorable Western. Nor is it a movie that warrants more than a single viewing. Though I think that for the true hardcore fans of the Western genre, then a movie such as "Eminence Hill" will bring proper entertainment.

My rating of "Eminence Hill" lands on a bland five out of ten stars.

I have a soft spot for Western movies - the genre itself is something I grew up with. Well that and Eastern Martial Arts movies. On the other hand I have been accused of being too nice when rating and reviewing movies. Which I think is mostly correct - with a few exceptions of course. But even if I don't like a movie, I try to see broader view and how it may be perceived.

Having said all that, this movie right here has some really nice production values (considering the budget it probably was made with). Add to that a script that does challenge its actors to perform. And while I understand that some may feel differently and there are moments that might make you cringe, overall that works too.

While it has a lot of dialog (too much I reckon for some), it also goes all the way when it comes to violence (blood) and nudity too. Something to consider one way or the other.

No other User Reviews yet. Twisty little western, obviously shot on a budget. My favorite bit was the way all the characters, obviously not well read in western history, talked like they were reading cue cards from a stage play. The clothes were too clean, the teeth too straight. To me it translated to "surreal". My kind of film. The sociopathic Marshall, the all to clean old cowpoke, the Hollywood hair bad guy, and the parody of religious fanatics (although unfortunately I think you could find them in real life). It was utterly entertaining to me. A cross between a TV western, a Shakespearean play, and a slasher. Wheee! I do kind of object to Lance Henriksen getting a top billing spot. He had less than 5 minutes and was obviously just there for his name. Collect that check. He did his part well. A number of characters were introduced and thrown away, but again, it wasn't trying to be historical or realistic. I'd watch it again someday.