Narziss und Goldmund
- 2020
- 1h 50m
IMDb RATING
6.3/10
1.2K
YOUR RATING
Goldmund is to study in the monastery Mariabronn. His father sent him there. There he meets a religious monk named Narziss. He has subjected himself to a strict life and lives completely asc... Read allGoldmund is to study in the monastery Mariabronn. His father sent him there. There he meets a religious monk named Narziss. He has subjected himself to a strict life and lives completely ascetically.Goldmund is to study in the monastery Mariabronn. His father sent him there. There he meets a religious monk named Narziss. He has subjected himself to a strict life and lives completely ascetically.
- Awards
- 3 nominations total
André Hennicke
- Lothar
- (as André M. Hennicke)
Featured reviews
I have not read the novel - although some who have seen the movie and have read the novel couldn't remember it - so I don't think there is a majority of those in the know. Still I can imagine that you have some more insights if you have read where this is going. And especially how the short stories really fit into each other.
That being said, the acting is good, the costumes are good and certain elements or stories work better than others. The friendship and some sexual adventures keep things interesting too - but it is sometimes hard to keep ones focus high or entirely interested in what is going to happen next. That would or could be a good thing I reckon: you never know where this is going to go entirely ... decent movie for someone like me and maybe you, who is not aware of the source matieral.
That being said, the acting is good, the costumes are good and certain elements or stories work better than others. The friendship and some sexual adventures keep things interesting too - but it is sometimes hard to keep ones focus high or entirely interested in what is going to happen next. That would or could be a good thing I reckon: you never know where this is going to go entirely ... decent movie for someone like me and maybe you, who is not aware of the source matieral.
An incredible film adaptation, with beautiful landscapes and extraordinary music. However, the story fails to captivate at all, so it becomes predictable moments. But overall it's a nice movie to watch, featuring great German performances by the young Jannis Niewöhner, Sabin Tambrea and Henriette Confurius, as well as extraordinary actors like Matthias Habich and André Hennicke.
In the film, Goldmund's sculptor master tells him how he gave up the true heartfelt art for commercial success... Well, that just about sums up the character of this feature.
Hesse's original novel is not anyway an accurate representation of history, so the film version should be also free from the pressure of historical-accuracy. But the overall presentation, from costumes, make-up, production design, cinematography, and atmosphere, are too much closer to those popular quasi-fantasy costume TV serieses such as the Tudors or Merlin. It is the world viewed through the glamour filter. I mean, such an entertainment has its place, but if that was the aim of the film makers, why did they bother with Hermann Hesse? They could just opt for a fantasy story with magicians and dragon... or something like that.
It's not terrible by all means. A large scale production, OK actors, some beautiful views... But it's ultimately too kitsch to have any true impact.
Hesse's original novel is not anyway an accurate representation of history, so the film version should be also free from the pressure of historical-accuracy. But the overall presentation, from costumes, make-up, production design, cinematography, and atmosphere, are too much closer to those popular quasi-fantasy costume TV serieses such as the Tudors or Merlin. It is the world viewed through the glamour filter. I mean, such an entertainment has its place, but if that was the aim of the film makers, why did they bother with Hermann Hesse? They could just opt for a fantasy story with magicians and dragon... or something like that.
It's not terrible by all means. A large scale production, OK actors, some beautiful views... But it's ultimately too kitsch to have any true impact.
Despite incredibly beautiful cinematography and a great story, the film is not able to transport the emotions of the original book. Some of the main cast is simply not convincing, perhaps there was not the right chemistry with the provenly talented director. Probably more enjoyable for people that don't know the book.
Spiritual insight can rarely be brought to the screen. Dreyer, Bresson and sometimes Rohmer achieved it, but good though this director is and visually exciting though the film is it is a banal rendering of Hermann Hesse. I do not think any of his books can be brought to the screen because all our visual pictures of his books are different to each person's inner screen: the imagination. The opening music tried to establish a ' religious ' feel and so did the scenery behind it. A brave attempt to attract an audience to Hesse, but sadly in our current era ( certainly in the UK ) this very great author has lost his appeal. Even in the 1970's when he was distorted by ' hippie ' culture and very popular he was distorted. A 4 for the director for trying.
Did you know
- TriviaThis is reportedly the first film adaptation of the well known book by Herman Hesse.
- How long is Narcissus and Goldmund?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- €10,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $233,325
- Runtime
- 1h 50m(110 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content