Ema

Larrain is an excellent film maker and there is craft on display here for sure, visually, and with elements of the score (not the Reggaeton - it is almost worth watching to hear Bernal's rant against what is certainly the worst musical genre on earth), but this is a chore. No element of the story really grabs, the main character is obnoxious and irritating, and the rest are neither here nor there. Probably a 4.5 but I'll give the benefit as there are moments. Hopefully his next will be a return to form. In the meantime I'll watch Jackie again.

I have mixed feelings about Ema - the film, and Ema - the main character. In both respects, there are great strengths and great weaknesses.

Ema is a young female dancer, who is married to her older, impotent choreographer (Gael Garcia Bernal). We learn early on that they adopted a boy called Polo, but gave him back after finding he had destructive tendencies. These tendencies are in Ema as well, and she is blamed by her husband and others for their failure at parenthood. So Ema decides to go on an anarchic rampage, literally blazing everything in her way. However, by the end of this story we realise that there is a method in her madness. She has worked out, in her own bizarre way, how to get exactly what she wants, and the plot quite cleverly ties up all the loose ends.

The cinematography will make your jaw drop at times, it's visually breathtaking and even the most ordinary scenes are beautifully framed and coloured. Nicolas Jaar's soundtrack is the sensual icing on the cake that draws you further in. The acting throughout is impressive, especially the lead played by Mariana Di Girólamo. She portrays the troubled but ultimately free spirit with a confident, seductive swagger. So far so good.

I think the main problem with the film is it's tone. It's confused. At no point do I know what to feel about any of the characters, and by the end I don't really care. This is particularly a problem with Ema. What are her intentions? Is she sympathetic, selfish, or unknowable? It seems that Larrain wants her to remain a mystery, but there's really not enough emotional depth to her character. She just comes across as impulsive and reckless. We find out what she really wants at the end, but it should have been obvious throughout. Then I might have believed that she actually cared about something. Gael Garcia Bernal is also wasted as a bitter but pathetic husband who contributes very little to the story.

Most of the film comes across as pretentious and showy. This is fine when it turns into a musical with extraordinary choreography, but it's lacking elsewhere. Likewise the cinematography often feels more like a music video or fashion promo, aesthetically spectacular but all surface value.

It's a shame, because if Larrain was more intent on guiding us through this story rather than shutting us out, it could have been a modern classic. Instead he decides to leave us lost and stranded along the way, without much clue of why anything is happening or where we are going. There's a big difference between mystery and confusion.

Having said that, there's still much to love about this film and I would recommend it to anyone. There's plenty to enjoy along the way, even if it is often irritating.

The image, the colors and the music is the only good thing about this movie. Unnatural dialogues make the movie look too baggy and fake. The relationships between the characters were also SO unreal that they made one as a spectator not connect with them. As always in Chilean movies, it is full of sex scenes. It seems that the writer took advantage and gave himself the fetish to see all the young Chilean actresses of the moment naked and kissing each other. I highlight the performance of Mariana Di Girolamo in her first leading role in the cinema. 5/10.

Larrain's movie Ema is very difficult to rate. It does have the potential of being an absolute masterpiece, it has its distinct voice, but somehow it did not convince me.

Ema has a wonderful technical style, it must be said. The photography is astounding, as is the coerography and the music that is featured in the movie. Larrain's crew definitely achieved something outstanding from that point of view. The cast was also wonderful. Bothe the lead actress and the veteran actor Gael Garcia Bernal gave us wonderful performances. It was particularly refreshing for me to see Bernal as a more mature character rather than the youngster he is well known for in Cuaron and Inarritu's movies.

It is hard to describe Ema's plot without spoiling the whole movie. What I can say is that Ema is about a woman, a modern dancer with a rebellious soul, which leads her to destructive tendencies (not self-destructive, I think this must be underlined). The film is literally mostly a portrayal of an unique female character, which is something undeniably positive, but it also has a very thin plot, that at the middle of the film seems to lead nowhere (although the action does have an ending of sorts). Ema is mostly a character study, but from a distance (the stoic approach of the performances doesn't allow the viewer to enter Ema's or the other character's thoughts). There is a touch of symbolism (pointed to by the beginning and ending scenes), but it felt either too evident, simple or too enigmatic to grasp.

It wouldn't surprise me if Ema ends up receiving a nomination in the Foreign Films category in the Oscars or any other award, because it most definitely is outstanding, but somehow, for once, I have to say that it wasn't exactly my cup of tea.

As "Ema" (2019 release from Chile; 107 min.) opens, we see a traffic light on fire, literally. As the camera scans back, we see a woman (Ema) walking away while she is holding a flamethrower. We then get to know Ema, a modern ballet dancer, and her husband Gaston, a troupe's choreographer. They argue back and forth about the fate of their 9 yr. Old child Polo, whom they had adopted but recently was taken away by (or turned in to?) the Children's Protection Services. What did Polo do exactly? At this point we are less than 10 min. Into the movie but to tell you more would spoil your viewing experience, you'll just have to see for yourself how it all plays out.

Couple of comments: this is the latest movie from Chilean director Pablo Lorrain. In fact it's his first movie since directing hos Hollywood debut in 2016 with the widely acclaimed "Jackie". For "Ema", he returns to Chile, and more specifically the Pacific Ocean town Valparaiso (itself a character and star in this film). The film is a fascinating mix of a family and relationship drama on the one hand, and more abstract observations on the other hand, topped off with a generous dose of reggaeton music and modern dancing. Beware: the movie features a LOT of nudity, so if that is an issue for you, I'd suggest you check out something else. The cast is for us Americans completely unknown, but kudos to Mariana Di Girolamo, who is just fantastic in the title role.

As noted in the film's end credits, the entire movie was filmed in Valparaiso in September of 2018. It premiered a year later at the 2019 Venice Film Festival. Then COVID messed up a theatrical release in the US. Now 3 years later after shooting, the movie had gotten a limited theatrical release in the US. It opened this weekend at my local arthouse theater here in Cincinnati, and I couldn't wait to see it. The early Saturday evening screening where I saw this at turned out to be a private screening. I literally was the only person in the theater. Never mind. If you are in the mood for a top notch foreign family and relationship drama, I'd readily suggest you check this out, be it in the theater (while you still can), on VOD, or on DVD/Blu-ray, and draw your own conclusion.