Gateway

The industrial products of Western cinema do not distance enough from bad movies made in Los Angeles and copy their manias, even though they tell stories that are not only unusual, but better than all the horror clunkers produced in California. Apart from my usual complaint about the abusive use of sound effects and music, «Gateway» is a good first horror feature by Irishman Niall Owens, with a very strange and ingenious premise: a group of marijuana suppliers (who bear little resemblance to marijuana growers who consume it at the same time) is looking for a safe place where they can sow, care for and harvest the "holy weed".

However, each one has a tragedy behind that is a load too heavy for them to carry. They are typical characters of the marijuana subculture and (disorganized) crime, immersed in an unhappy intrigue that contains some elements that we already know from other horror movies: settling of scores inside a haunted house, where creditors of life, ghosts in search of vindication and pale entities that control the space manifest themselves and interact with the living with dire consequences.

Everything comes to a fair and consistent end, thanks to the images created by Owens and his cinematographer Ger Murphy, which are sinister enough to unsettle us, even though it all happens in a day in broad daylight: the house is sunny, and the exteriors are bright. However, the filmmakers were not confident enough to minimize the manipulative sound and omnipresent musical score. This said aside, it is a highly recommended film, especially for those who like the genre... with a twist.

I didn't watch this one for a while after adding it to my collection. It was just another small budget horror thrown in the watch later bin. So glad I finally got around to watching this film. The camera work is good. Shots are beautifully set up. The characters are well developed. It reminded a bit of how Stephen King would always give you enough about the victims to care when he had the monster get them. A lot of horror tends to make the victims "deserve it" and that's what I thought I was getting here but instead I got was characters that while horrible, were also incredibly sympathetic. The writer made me care and that matters in good horror. The ending was very well done and over all I really enjoyed this movie. Some other reviews mention it being boring or slow, I found it was a very nice level of suspense but attention spans run short these days.

Definitely a keeper.

I'm a huge fan of the "How the f&*% did we get here" kind of films, and the synopsis really felt like it was going to be in that style.

Unfortunately, about 85% of the movie is just nothing. A bunch of hoodlums doing hoodlum stuff, milling about, doing nothing, etc...

I was so bored to absolute tears that I'm pretty sure my brain just turned off until the monotony of the banal hoodlum slice of life portion of the film was over that I barely knew what was even going on.

I will say the acting was passable, everyone did really well, but you can only do so much with writing that consists of "Do hoodlum things like walk around and do nothing for 85% of the film."

The acting is great and the cinematography is great. The plot is incredibly boring and hard to make sense of. I am not even sure I would classify this as horror, maybe more like a psychological drama. Slow burn is one thing but geez.

Slow as molasses tale of a gang who decide to take over an abandoned house to grow weed in. In an upstairs bedroom is a gateway to...somewhere hellish. There's too much build-up that doesn't do anything to heighten the experience; we don't know them any better, the better to care about what happens to them. Then there's too much silent watching. The mood is dark and dreadful, but that's not enough. It feels more like a crime saga, but still, one I don't care too much about.