IMDb RATING
7.0/10
1.8K
YOUR RATING
A baking competition with 4 teams, 3 rounds, 2 cakes and 1 winner of $10,000.A baking competition with 4 teams, 3 rounds, 2 cakes and 1 winner of $10,000.A baking competition with 4 teams, 3 rounds, 2 cakes and 1 winner of $10,000.
- Awards
- 1 win total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Netflix has got so much to love here. On one hand, the fact that the contestants are professional bakers means we get to see some legendary cakes - which is exactly what I want to see.
But on the other hand, the presenter - he's trying way too hard - and like all these overly Americanised shows, there's no character to any of it.
The judges are interesting enough; maybe with a few more episodes I'll get to like them, but this is a show about cakes and that's what you're getting.
Overall, I'll watch all 8 episodes and I'll savour every moment.
Netflix if you're watching, Sugar Rush is a decent enough show, it just needs a few tweaks
But on the other hand, the presenter - he's trying way too hard - and like all these overly Americanised shows, there's no character to any of it.
The judges are interesting enough; maybe with a few more episodes I'll get to like them, but this is a show about cakes and that's what you're getting.
Overall, I'll watch all 8 episodes and I'll savour every moment.
Netflix if you're watching, Sugar Rush is a decent enough show, it just needs a few tweaks
Compared to some of the other cooking competitions Netflix has rolled out most recently (Nailed It comes to mind), this one is definitely above the rest. The borrowed time strategy adds a flair of uniqueness that keeps the relatively dated concept new. The host, on the other hand, comes off as that kind of middle manager that everyone's had at some point in their life, and is overly condescending to the contestants - it made the show difficult to watch whenever he came on. I think they were trying to have him motivate the contestants, but he clearly is not equipped to do that when his form of motivation is outright negative.
I really enjoy this show and I'm super happy the second season is out. I just enjoy it for what it is: something fun and easy to watch on a rainy Saturday when I need a break! I love that each episode is a stand-alone so I can just watch at random.
I don't mind the host or judges at all. I love all the bright colours and fun, current themes for the challenges.
I realize there is more behind the scenes planning put into their creations but I don't care.
A Netflix win for me!
Sugar Rush serves well as eye-candy. There's vibrant colors, talented bakers, and impressive designs. BUT - there's no personality to the show. The tone is very off-putting.
Competitive baking shows are hard to do right. You want them to be educational, as you want to educate the viewer about baking so they can be more engaged while watching, but you want it to be entertaining at the same time by building tension and drama. It's a hard mixture to get right.
Where this show falls short is when you compare it to the masterclass competitive baking show that is the Great British Baking Show (Great British Bake Off). GBBS focuses on the craft and process of baking, emphasizing technique and knowledge of baking more so than pure aesthetic. This lets the viewer craft profiles of the contestants as they learn more of what each baker's style is. In addition, GBBS has a calm, relaxing tone to the show while still maintaining its competitive traits.
Sugar Rush is essentially a toned-down version of Zumbo's Just Desserts (which is awful outside of Zumbo's creations) that has been slightly improved, but the core recipe that they're working with simply isn't going to work. Fancy cupcakes, points, buttons, and bright lights are nothing but fluff without engagement and emphasis on the process that gets them there.
Competitive baking shows are hard to do right. You want them to be educational, as you want to educate the viewer about baking so they can be more engaged while watching, but you want it to be entertaining at the same time by building tension and drama. It's a hard mixture to get right.
Where this show falls short is when you compare it to the masterclass competitive baking show that is the Great British Baking Show (Great British Bake Off). GBBS focuses on the craft and process of baking, emphasizing technique and knowledge of baking more so than pure aesthetic. This lets the viewer craft profiles of the contestants as they learn more of what each baker's style is. In addition, GBBS has a calm, relaxing tone to the show while still maintaining its competitive traits.
Sugar Rush is essentially a toned-down version of Zumbo's Just Desserts (which is awful outside of Zumbo's creations) that has been slightly improved, but the core recipe that they're working with simply isn't going to work. Fancy cupcakes, points, buttons, and bright lights are nothing but fluff without engagement and emphasis on the process that gets them there.
I don't know why so many other reviewers are criticizing the host. It is obvious that there is a bit more planning that goes on behind the scenes, since the contestants have access to things that wouldn't normally be in a standard pastry kitchen. However, I think the host adds a lot of enthusiasm to the show. One of the things I love is that it is always surprising and enjoyable, but doesn't have the negative drama that is present on some cooking shows. This is one show that my husband, my 5 yr old granddaughter and I can all watch together.
Did you know
- TriviaHunter Marsh is gluten intolerant so you never actually see him try the cupcakes or the cakes - except for that one time, where a team of bakers used gluten-free flour for their creations.
- ConnectionsFeatured in MsMojo: Top 10 Amazing Food Shows to Watch on Netflix (2019)
- How many seasons does Sugar Rush have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Sugar Rush: Extra Sweet
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content