IMDb RATING
3.8/10
397
YOUR RATING
How will three sisters save the Shakespeare Chateau, historic mansion and beloved family home, from a corrupt bank that threatens to foreclose on Christmas Day?How will three sisters save the Shakespeare Chateau, historic mansion and beloved family home, from a corrupt bank that threatens to foreclose on Christmas Day?How will three sisters save the Shakespeare Chateau, historic mansion and beloved family home, from a corrupt bank that threatens to foreclose on Christmas Day?
Ashlyn Ford
- Lizzy Phipps
- (as Ashlynn Ford)
Featured reviews
This has some of the most laughably bad lighting and editing I've ever seen in a commercially released movie. In more than one scene the light completely changes from one POV to the next. One scene in particular stands out as a clunker: the bank guy and his fat buddy are in his office. The one guy is sitting. Then it cuts to show the guy walking to the chair they just showed him seated in! And the other guy is doing something like they didn't even know they had started rolling.!!! Just laughably bad and edited by someone who apparently had no concept of what editing involved or apparently had never seen a film before.
Three Sisters At The Christmas Chateau/Christmas At The Chateau (2019) -
This was a bad film. Honestly I'm not sure why I finished it.
I didn't like the leading couple, even before he found his redemption and neither of them were attractive and I don't mean just physically. Their characters, Grant (Justin Jones) and Brooke (Kinsey Leigh Redmond) were irritating and while he was slimy, she was stupid.
It was so hard to believe them getting together. I certainly couldn't fall for the man taking MY house away. He didn't even really apologise or help her correct things. They also had no idea how to communicate and why would they get together when there was no spark at all. Even their unknown connection by phone wasn't romantic.
Their "Anonymous" texts were a bit weird, because they were deliberately not saying anything that would have moved the story along and it was so obvious that's what was happening.
The supporting actors were awful too and his son and her youngest sister were actually entirely pointless characters.
The whole middle sister thing was odd too. They made a huge fuss about her coming home to start with and then nothing after that. In fact the "Three Sisters" title really made no sense at all, because the other two contributed diddly squat to the plot.
There were so many bits about the film as a whole that were annoying - All of her Shakespeare quotes for one thing and the fact that they asked the public to pay for their financial issues for another. Why should other people donate to their failing B&B just because Brooke doesn't know how to run a business?
It also had no Christmas magic at all and Grant giving her back her own necklace was not a gift.
Really I can't find anything positive to say about it at all. Usually I do at least fancy the leading man, but that did not happen at all with Justin Jones, who was as boring as his banking character.
I should have turned it off when I first thought about it.
2.25/10.
This was a bad film. Honestly I'm not sure why I finished it.
I didn't like the leading couple, even before he found his redemption and neither of them were attractive and I don't mean just physically. Their characters, Grant (Justin Jones) and Brooke (Kinsey Leigh Redmond) were irritating and while he was slimy, she was stupid.
It was so hard to believe them getting together. I certainly couldn't fall for the man taking MY house away. He didn't even really apologise or help her correct things. They also had no idea how to communicate and why would they get together when there was no spark at all. Even their unknown connection by phone wasn't romantic.
Their "Anonymous" texts were a bit weird, because they were deliberately not saying anything that would have moved the story along and it was so obvious that's what was happening.
The supporting actors were awful too and his son and her youngest sister were actually entirely pointless characters.
The whole middle sister thing was odd too. They made a huge fuss about her coming home to start with and then nothing after that. In fact the "Three Sisters" title really made no sense at all, because the other two contributed diddly squat to the plot.
There were so many bits about the film as a whole that were annoying - All of her Shakespeare quotes for one thing and the fact that they asked the public to pay for their financial issues for another. Why should other people donate to their failing B&B just because Brooke doesn't know how to run a business?
It also had no Christmas magic at all and Grant giving her back her own necklace was not a gift.
Really I can't find anything positive to say about it at all. Usually I do at least fancy the leading man, but that did not happen at all with Justin Jones, who was as boring as his banking character.
I should have turned it off when I first thought about it.
2.25/10.
Some may claim this is a parody; but, unfortunately, even if that was true, it was a very bad parody. It was uneven with no redeeming qualities at all. The only bright spot was the lovely inn. The only way this dog could have been salvaged is if they made it into a silent film, while showing clips of the inn.
The acting in this is so over the top and hammy, or should be criminal.
The story line is a good one, where a family owned B&B is threatened with foreclosure just before Christmas. The family works to save it in time and there's the evil blanket eh doesn't want them to. All the banker lacks is the moustache he twirls as he's plotting against Moose and Squirrel.
The lead actress.. Did she take acting lessons from "Over Emote Inc."? Is she related to someone involved in the writing or producing if this movie? Is that how she got the gig?
The script is weak and predictable.
The filming isn't as clean as it could have been. The lens seems to have a light film of Vaseline over it.
The editing is hilarious when people talk and their lips aren't moving, and vice versa.
I watched to the end only because I wanted to know I was right.
The story line is a good one, where a family owned B&B is threatened with foreclosure just before Christmas. The family works to save it in time and there's the evil blanket eh doesn't want them to. All the banker lacks is the moustache he twirls as he's plotting against Moose and Squirrel.
The lead actress.. Did she take acting lessons from "Over Emote Inc."? Is she related to someone involved in the writing or producing if this movie? Is that how she got the gig?
The script is weak and predictable.
The filming isn't as clean as it could have been. The lens seems to have a light film of Vaseline over it.
The editing is hilarious when people talk and their lips aren't moving, and vice versa.
I watched to the end only because I wanted to know I was right.
This movie was not good. The writing was atrocious, the editing was awful, and the story line was choppy. Things were happening but not explained. I'm not a Banker or Hedge-fund manager so I didn't understand exactly what happened to her money except that it was stolen.
Did you know
- TriviaFilmed on location in St. Joseph, Missouri at a functioning bed-and-breakfast.
- Quotes
Grant Ogden: It truly was... a Christmas at the Chateau.
- SoundtracksFireside
By Kelly Bartley
Published by Premiumbeat Music
- How long is Christmas at the Chateau?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Christmas at the Chateau
- Filming locations
- Shakespeare Chateau, Missouri, USA(location)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 38m(98 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content