Memoria

To me this is the main issue with Memoria. For example, the IMDB question about spoilers is not even needed, there can be basically no spoilers when reviewing this film, since the "narrative" (can't really call it that) is fragmented and merely the pretext for the reflections the movie undertakes on several clever memory-related topics (notably the reality of recollection), from the simple perspective of the experiences concerning a single human individual, to the collective thoughts of a society as a whole. In that vein the characters and some movie conventions (the classical journey of the main character, although we are never sure what it exactly is) are used as a sort of vessels.

As long as that is accepted I found that most of my criticism (which would put me firmly on the side of "bad" reviewers) fell off the wayside, and I enjoyed this beautifully shot contemplative piece for what it was.

But why didn't I rate it higher? Frankly because I was underwhelmed with the meditation itself or the tropes enveloping it (as I saw them), finding some of them trite and even ridiculous. Meditation around different issues comes also from some sort of familiarity, and I was not convinced that the filmmaker was not merely a tourist in this universe, rather than someone with a particularly deep insight.

This sort of approach is, of course, totally acceptable, just not something I could relate to here, as I could in other films he has done. And thus issues such the length of the film (as well as some of the sequences) became a problem, which would not have been the case had I felt fully in sync with the piece.

I like slow-burning films; the idea of being given enough time to really live in the movie you are watching really appeals to me, often more so than faster-paced, spectacular projects. I also like arthouse films; the atmosphere and characters can often be just as engaging, if not more, than a traditionally linear storyline. Thing is, you need to have at least the semblance of a storyline in a film, otherwise, it's like buying a loaf of bread and finding no bread in it!

Memoria is deliberately pitched at a snail's pace. There isn't a storyline as such, but rather a series of events, some of which we return to. Clearly, Apichatpong Weerasethakul, who writes and directs, has a vision for this - together, one would presume, with his cast and crew. For the most part, it leaves me cold, and I find myself trying to imagine how Weerasethakul initially tried to communicate what he is trying to achieve here to his actors. I actually felt the makers were taking the mickey, daring me to stick with this when they have no intention of providing much reason to, or indeed any kind of pay-off.

Some will undoubtedly tell me I don't 'get' it, and that's almost certainly true, but I can't honestly see that there is anything *to* get, because with the suspension of disbelief fully installed, all I see here is a group of blandly inoffensive people doing very little except having whispered conversations and being desperately polite to each other in front of an unmoving camera. There were times when I had to wait for someone to blink to convince myself the BluRay hadn't frozen. This left me cold, I'm afraid. My score is 3 out of 10 for some nicely filmed locations.

This movie is very hard to watch and requires much patience. If you can connect with the movie, it will make it easier to watch. There are very long and still sequences. From the beginning to the end of the film, confusion prevails. We cant really understand what is happening. Nothing is clear. And the movie does not give us many answers. This is a "feel" movie. If you cant connect with the characters or the storyline it will be a disappointing experience for you.

A woman hears noises. The audience will hear the noises, too. The woman jumps when she hears the noises. So too might the audience. She wants to find out what the noises are. We're along for the ride, trying to understand her journey as best we can...

Memoria is a film that's very, very different. Mostly, it's unique in a good way, but it is a challenging watch and if you're like me, you might come out of it not knowing exactly what you just saw... but hopefully, you'll appreciate how it made you feel.

I read this was only ever going to be shown theatrically, and that it would never get a streaming release or be released on DVD/Bluray. I thought that sounded pretentious, but now after seeing the film, if they stick with that plan, I understand why. Memoria is a quiet and sometimes deathly still film. I don't know if most people (myself included) would be able to concentrate on it completely if they were at home, and had mobile phones and the like as distractions.

This becomes clearest in the second half, which warps and seemingly deconstructs time itself as you're watching it. I know how pretentious that sounds. But approximately the last half is one long sequence that is slow in a way that's kind of awe-inspiring. And I can only estimate that this concluding chunk of the film was one half of it. It may have been more like 70 minutes. It could've been as short as half an hour.

With no clear narrative or structure, you're left no choice but focus intently in on what is (or isn't?) happening. It ends up being hypnotic. Some people were audibly relieved when it was over. I'd be lying if I said I was riveted the whole time, but I was too impressed with how Memoria as a whole felt to watch unfold to say it came anywhere close to being a waste of time.

Tilda Swindon deserves praise, too. I think the film asks a lot of her, and asks her to do it all subtly, too. She gives a great performance, and one that I don't think many others could do. Overall, this is a very slow and perplexing film, but I can't call it boring, and because of the unique experience it provided, I wouldn't call it frustrating or pretentious, either. It's absolutely worth 137 minutes of your attention, as long as you're mostly onboard with seeing something out there, and one that seeks to give you a unique film-watching experience more than it gives you a traditional narrative, or any easy answers.

This movie is only for the eyes of a few people. To those eyes, it offers many answers, inspiration, and a lot of insight - to the latter it will look like total rubbish. I understand and respect this. However, this movie was fascinating for me. It requires a great amount of patience and total attention - and a base knowledge of buddhism helps a lot with many symbols scattered around the movie. It is something that needs you to focus with an open mind - because it has nothing to do with a story, a plot, it rather gives you the chance to observe a very subtle reality often ignored. Not with a storyline, but a chain of circumstances which may look meaningless or unimportant if you don't look close enough. Sounds were used brilliantly, and the whole movie made me feel there was nothing decorative, all scenes, and little things, and pauses were there only because they were absolutely necessary to deliver the message. It was more like a meditation. This one provided me so many unexpected answers and spiritual inspiration, and I'm sure I'll be thinking about it and 'feeling' it for a while.