Prowler

I wanted to like this. As someone enjoys micro budget filmmaking some of the strong points here were very strong. The locations were great and the photography was excellent.

The main areas where this film suffered though are quite inexcusable - script and sound. The story made zero sense at times and left the actors with no where to go and nothing to do, and the sound was woeful. Was there any sound recording at some of exterior locations? I'm not sure.

Got to applaud the ambition here and the work that it takes to get a film made, but get the fundamentals right and the rest will follow.

Why didn't they get any actors? Or a sound engineer? Come to think of it a script writer.

This has to be one of the worst films, I have ever seen. Terrible sound , low budget plot you could shoot in one room.

Watch first 2 minutes, 2 in the middle and skip to the end. You will save yourself an hour or so and a vacuous script. Actually the acting was so bad it made the script look better. This is a plot formula which has been used on numerous occasions. The director had a dream, no not Martin Luther King's, no he thought he was Hitchcock. He isn't. There are reviews disparaging others' views. Surely comments should be about films seen and not other reviewers comments?

There is a bleak hedge scene in this movie. It's an old English Yew. All I can say it's much more interesting and fast moving than this movie. Plot is utter nonsense. Scenes that don't tie up with what's subsequently said and done. Low budget drivel.