A lonely widower finds a mysterious video on his computer that leads him to an abandoned town occupied by an ominous entity.A lonely widower finds a mysterious video on his computer that leads him to an abandoned town occupied by an ominous entity.A lonely widower finds a mysterious video on his computer that leads him to an abandoned town occupied by an ominous entity.
- Awards
- 6 wins & 10 nominations total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Good movie to watch for the horror atmosphere created by director and also great cinematography good plot all in 70 min movie.
Brilliant cinematography, great atmosphere, but sometimes it feels too long despite being only 70 minutes including credits. Not exactly a horror, but rather a dramatic ghost story with average acting and a nice twist.
Absolute B Grade movie, nothing impressive.. very dull and meaningless movie... Acting is horrible and storyline is not good
SPIRITS IN THE DARK presents the thoughts of a lonely widower, recorded via camera mostly in a first-person perspective, who is drawn to an abandoned town by a mysterious video. Once there, he encounters strange events.
This is an extremely slow-paced movie that places heavy emphasis on a moody atmosphere. And in that, it partially succeeds, both because the director has a good eye for composition and color, and because the abandoned setting he chose is naturally well-suited for that purpose.
Unfortunately, there is just too little going on to provide a payoff for most people. As the protagonist goes through the abandoned buildings, watching the movie begins to feel like watching someone play a sandbox video game. There certainly are people who enjoy this, but this is a movie, not twitch!
I think the director was intentionally going for an excessively contemplative approach, but if that is the aim, then the contemplations have to be of such a high caliber that they themselves provide a payoff to the audience. In this case, they don't, in my opinion.
The ending was both anticlimactic and a bit confusing, but not necessarily unpredictable. There is a possible suggestion that the child he finds in the building is his own, stolen by the murdered woman right after the accident that killed his wife, and that much of what we see in the end are visions of a dying man, but it is not definite.
All in all, this is only recommended for people who value atmosphere in movies over everything else.
This is an extremely slow-paced movie that places heavy emphasis on a moody atmosphere. And in that, it partially succeeds, both because the director has a good eye for composition and color, and because the abandoned setting he chose is naturally well-suited for that purpose.
Unfortunately, there is just too little going on to provide a payoff for most people. As the protagonist goes through the abandoned buildings, watching the movie begins to feel like watching someone play a sandbox video game. There certainly are people who enjoy this, but this is a movie, not twitch!
I think the director was intentionally going for an excessively contemplative approach, but if that is the aim, then the contemplations have to be of such a high caliber that they themselves provide a payoff to the audience. In this case, they don't, in my opinion.
The ending was both anticlimactic and a bit confusing, but not necessarily unpredictable. There is a possible suggestion that the child he finds in the building is his own, stolen by the murdered woman right after the accident that killed his wife, and that much of what we see in the end are visions of a dying man, but it is not definite.
All in all, this is only recommended for people who value atmosphere in movies over everything else.
I love the fact that the writer/director/star doesn't look like your typical lead in movies today. I sat here watching this and knowing that I've seen that face and heard the distinctive accent and even though I was not sure when or what movie it was from but I had a feeling that what ever it was I enjoyed it. I didn't want to pull out IMDb during this movie so I waited. I enjoyed this and while I to think it was a little to long I can't fault the people who made it as any shorter it wouldn't be long enough to be feature length. But the understated nature of the film builds the creepy feeling. If you like creepy more than scary this will work for you and if you like horror without gore this is your movie as well. Look for the other film from this writer/director/lead it's called Moth and it's from 2016. It is Mothman but has little to nothing to do with Mothman of WV. That to is a well crafted story with fine acting and it was far better than I anticipated.
Did you know
- TriviaDue to its unusual concept and approach, the actors have very limited screen time. Despite being the protagonist, József Gallai has less than 13 minutes, Ágota Dunai has approximately 3 minutes, Peter Cosgrove and Beáta Boldog have 90-90 seconds, while Zsófia Gallai and Gergö Elekes have less than a minute of screen presence.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Project Skyquake (2022)
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $7,250 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 11m(71 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content