Leonardo

Really enjoyed this series, the only let down was Freddie Highmore. He just doesn't fit in.

Now I did quite enjoy this rather loose interpretation of the life of Leonardo Da Vinci, but somehow the thing seemed very uncertain as to whom it's audience is/was. It certainly lacks the creative punch of the first season of Tom Riley's "Da Vinci's Demons" (2013) or the familial charm of "Bridgerton" man of the moment Jonathan Bailey's 2011 television series. This seems just too gentile a reflection on the lives and loves of this creative genius. It dwells not on his presumed hedonistic lifestyle; it focuses little on his engineering and artistic prowess and his interesting relationships with the Medici are ignored almost entirely. To be fair, much of the "history" surrounding this man is glorified fable, we actually know a lot less than we assume about his life, but somehow this iteration is little better than an outing for Turner (and his ever changing beard) with little emphasis on his genius - indeed, little enough emphasis on anything substantial, really. Eight parts tell us very little about what made this undoubtedly complex man tick and whilst I wasn't expecting a Showtime sex-fest; I was expecting something a little more interesting/educational/entertaining. Production standards are high but the writing and overall direction condemn it to mediocrity. Shame, it reminded me a little of "Reign" (2013) - the equally sterile depiction of the life of Mary, Queen of Scots.

Reviews on this have been love or hate. I'm hoping to go for something more balanced.

Let me get a few things straight.

I don't dislike this series because it's "woke." There's evidence to suggest Leonardo was gay, and portraying him as such is entirely justified.

I don't dislike this because it's a fusion of bio pic and murder mystery. That was a bold idea that might have worked.

I don't dislike this because it takes dramatic license with historical truth. We know that anything historical is a version of the truth and that this is not a documentary. We get that.

No, the reason I dislike this is that its bold ambition doesn't work. The script is poor. Exposition is simplistic and anachronistic - at one point, Leonardo compares his mental state to a black hole! But worse than that there's no subtext. Things are made explicit in the script in a way that reflects soap operas, not real life. "You were a mistake," his father tells Leonardo. One wonders whether da Vinci Senior was actually that crass, or whether the script writer just wasn't up to the task.

Aidan Turner looks wonderful, from the young apprentice to the old bearded maestro, but aside from a few touching moments, this is not his best performance. Acting props go to James D'Arcy's Ludovico Sforza, played with a masterly blend of camp and menace, and to Carlos Cuevas, who is perfectly cast as Salai. Freddie Highmore, on the other hand, is badly out of his depth.

It looks beautiful, with many frames set up almost as masterpieces in their own right. I'd be happy just to watch as his works of art took shape, but you can't get an 8-part series out of that. My heart sinks to hear of a second series. What are they going to do - accuse him of murdering someone else? It's a strange way to treat one of history's greatest geniuses.

There bas been much debate about how this series has been fictionalized, with any drama you have to accept that this is a story, and it does not have to be100% accurate, in the way that a documentary is. I really do not understand people who will score a series only one, when if you split apart the components that go to make a series like this, you would score way above that. It pays not to have unrealistic expectations when you approach something historical. The other thing is of course that although Leonardo Da Vinci left some amazing artworks, we know surprisingly little about his life.

I really enjoyed this series. You don't have to be artistic to appreciate the loving detail that went into creating the stories around each of his artworks, and the immense talent he undoubtedly had. Aidan Turner embraced the challenge wholeheartedly, and whilst he probably won't get nominated for any major awards, he can be proud of his work, as can the supporting cast. They created an interesting story, with beautiful sets and an appreciation for the depth of his contribution to art, and I think that counts for a lot.

Very interesting show. Well cast except for Freddie Highmore. He seems to be playing a renaissance Shawn Murphy (The Good Doctor) with a beard and a British accent. His character just doesn't fit in. Is it nepotism if you are the executive producer? Selfotism? Please Freddie, you are a great actor, just not in this role.