Viking Blood

I watched the movie which lasted almost 2 hours and I was curious enough to check it's ratings. By the time I read the 10/10 rating that 1-2 people reviewed with, I was kinda confused whether or not we watched the same movie. It was a bad movie, I feel like I wasted my time. There was nothing impressive to it. Some of the actors were decent, the rest of them felt like they were paying to actually be in the movie.

It is a meandering series of half squirts at a coherent plot. The big bad Earl has 10 men plus his wife and himself that the goody takes down. The good thing about it is it ends.

Seems like a pretty amateur effort, but the actors take it seriously and I enjoyed it. Sort of a Viking era Western. Some of the other reviewers are right in that the editing is terrible. Has lots of other flaws but it has a certain charm that you only find in independent flicks.

A fairly poor attempt, to save on money the costumes are terrible, the sets are pathetic, the editing is shocking.

It gets a 2 because I like Viking shows but this looks like it was made by the high school film club, probably best avoided.

Fist full of Dollars was the original, this is a weak attempt to use that storyline and make a Viking version. Acting 7/10, Plot 2/10 unoriginal, Overall 5/10.