[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Episode guide
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Strange Evidence

  • TV Series
  • 2017–
  • TV-PG
  • 1h
IMDb RATING
4.6/10
411
YOUR RATING
Strange Evidence (2017)
DocumentaryMystery

In Strange Evidence, a team of experts analyses footage that seems to defy explanation, including levitating cars on a freeway, a statue that appears to move on its own, and a spontaneous bu... Read allIn Strange Evidence, a team of experts analyses footage that seems to defy explanation, including levitating cars on a freeway, a statue that appears to move on its own, and a spontaneous burst of flames.In Strange Evidence, a team of experts analyses footage that seems to defy explanation, including levitating cars on a freeway, a statue that appears to move on its own, and a spontaneous burst of flames.

  • Stars
    • Harry Prichett
    • Brian Wolshon
    • Sian Proctor
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    4.6/10
    411
    YOUR RATING
    • Stars
      • Harry Prichett
      • Brian Wolshon
      • Sian Proctor
    • 66User reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Episodes84

    Browse episodes
    TopTop-rated

    Photos10

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 4
    View Poster

    Top cast99+

    Edit
    Harry Prichett
    Harry Prichett
    • Narrator…
    Brian Wolshon
    • Self…
    • 2017–2023
    Sian Proctor
    • Self - Geoscientist…
    • 2017–2021
    Jeff Wise
    Jeff Wise
    • Self - Science Journalist
    • 2018–2021
    Conor McCourt
    • Self - Image Analyst
    • 2017–2021
    Jayde Lovell
    Jayde Lovell
    • Self - Biologist…
    • 2018–2021
    Liberty Vittert
    • Self…
    • 2021
    Matt Kutcher
    Matt Kutcher
    • Self - Pyrotechnics Expert…
    • 2018–2021
    Lindsay Moran
    • Self - Former CIA Operative…
    • 2017–2020
    Greg Szulgit
    • Self - Biologist
    • 2018–2021
    David Wallace
    • Self - Electrical Engineer…
    • 2017–2021
    Kelly Price
    • Self - Biologist…
    • 2017–2019
    Danni Washington
    Danni Washington
    • Self - Marine Biologist
    • 2018–2020
    Chad Orzel
    • Self - Physicist
    • 2019–2021
    Joe Pappalardo
    • Self - Journalist…
    • 2017–2020
    Carlo Munoz
    • Self - Military Analyst
    • 2018–2020
    Martin K.A. Morgan
    Martin K.A. Morgan
    • Self - Military Historian…
    • 2020–2021
    Kevin Kasky
    • Self - Entomologist
    • 2018–2021
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews66

    4.6411
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    1snowman-31315

    Wow science channel, smh

    This has to be one of the worst tv shows iv ever seen. Iv tried on many occasions to watch it hopeing maybe the episode i watched previously was just a bad example. But no, every single episode is the same they take an easily explained phenomenon, use some idiot who pretends to be an expert in something or other, show you a few frames of a blurry video, and then pretend as if theres some mystery to it. After about 15 to 20 mins of this ridiculous scharade they show the entire video and explain that its something that was easily identified by any rational human. Rinse and repeat. I dont know what happened to the educational channels but almost all of them are doing shows like this now. I dont know if its about money or its simply easier to make or maybe theres an overall plot to keep us stupid whatever the reasons the once decent shows on history, science, natgeo ect. have been replaced with trash. Not only that but they play these shows over and over. Everyday is a marathon of one of these shows or another its to the point i dont watch any of them anymore, shame to because thats all i used to watch.
    1Juliechar

    Shame on you Science Channel!!

    With all of the mind numbing drivel that is on TV these days, the science channel USED to be the place you could go that had shows with some form of intelligence. Strange evidence just shows that the science channel has succumb to the ignorance of the masses. Not only are the "theories" they come up with utter nonsense that even a 5 yr old could see through, their facts are just downright wrong!!! I just heard them say with one of these ridiculous theories regarding a giant spider web that black widows kill 7 people a year. That is just PLAIN WRONG!!!!! Is anyone actually fact checking the stories? Not to mention anyone, esp a biologist being interviewed, that knows anything about spiders knows it couldn't possibly be a black widow web. But I guess it's all about what sells and the science channel is becoming no different than all the other garbage that is on these days. So sad....
    1jeffa123

    no conclusions

    What is this?

    It could be a yoyo it might be a burrito .... next video repeat.
    1ttomet

    Another once good, fact based, educational channel is biting the dust.

    This program is insulting to the field of SCIENCE. And by being that it is insulting to the people, viewers, that made the Science Channel a quality network.

    It appears that the producer/s of this show are trying to draw a certain type of viewer, while hoping that their existing viewers will remain. Well, this program is not succeeding at keeping existing viewers like me. If this channel, network, keeps inviting fans of baseless, fact-less, and ridiculous "conspiracy theories", then they are going to lose their fan base and current viewers. But then, maybe the Science Channel has calculated that there are more "conspiracy theory" gullibles and that the SC would rather have those types of fans.

    The "experts" on this show should consider how this show is ruining their reputations. The producers of this show get these "experts" to make the most ridiculous, nonsensical, and downright STUPID comments about, "What could this be? It looks like it might be aliens or monsters!?"

    WTF are you doing Science Channel? You've been showing this stupid program for about 3 years now. And there is another show that insults a viewers intelligence on this network. It's called, 'What on Earth?" This show uses the same ridiculous nonsense and idiocy spewed by "experts" about places on Earth that are spotted by satellite cameras. Just like "Strange Evidence", there are so called "experts". All of these "experts" are obviously told to make the stupidest questions and statements that NO EXPERT in their scientific field would ever consider or make.

    The Science Channel is starting to go down the same road of idiocy and stupidity that the History channel and Discovery have gone down. History channel should be renamed to the "Ancient Alien Theorists" channel. And if so, then is it possible that this network has been overtaken by aliens? Ancient alien theorists say, "YES!" Well of course they do.

    I, and others who have functioning brains, expect a network called, "Science", to actually provide programs and shows that are based on actual fact based, researched, and reality based information. These types of programs have no redeeming value. The only thing these stupid programs can do is to give conspiracy theorists, and "alternative facts" believers something they can attach to, to make themselves feel that they are "right".
    qnwqcwjk

    Appalling

    It's utterly pathetic that I figure out the 'mysterious' events at home, just using logic. The new channel 'Cottage Life' has scrap shows like this; I will NEVER subscribe to a channel that defames real science & using your brain. Pitiful.

    More like this

    What on Earth?
    5.8
    What on Earth?
    Strangest Things
    7.0
    Strangest Things
    Mysteries of the Abandoned
    7.4
    Mysteries of the Abandoned
    The Proof Is Out There
    6.6
    The Proof Is Out There
    Paranormal Caught on Camera
    6.1
    Paranormal Caught on Camera
    The Unbelievable with Dan Aykroyd
    7.1
    The Unbelievable with Dan Aykroyd
    History's Greatest Mysteries
    6.9
    History's Greatest Mysteries
    Forbidden History
    6.1
    Forbidden History
    L'Histoire en 3D
    7.3
    L'Histoire en 3D
    Paranormal : les dossiers Holzer
    7.1
    Paranormal : les dossiers Holzer
    Expedition Files
    7.2
    Expedition Files
    Lost Monster Files
    5.7
    Lost Monster Files

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      90% of the time, the "experts" have no clue what caused the weird or eerie footage, and simply leave the viewer hanging. Yet, they are "scientists". Example: footage is shown of a cemetery in Tajikistan, where all the graves are nothing but empty holes. The bodies have been removed, along with their coffins. The experts immediately dismiss grave robbers. and ponder about them being zombies rising from the dead or weather causing it, instead.
    • Connections
      Featured in Science Friction (2022)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ11

    • How many seasons does Strange Evidence have?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • October 17, 2017 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Official sites
      • Science Channel (United States)
      • tv.apple.com
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Evidencias insólitas
    • Production companies
      • WAG TV
      • Science Channel
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour
    • Color
      • Color
    • Aspect ratio
      • 16:9 HD

    Related news

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    Strange Evidence (2017)
    Top Gap
    By what name was Strange Evidence (2017) officially released in Canada in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit pageAdd episode

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.