Out of Darkness

There hasn't been many films about prehistoric people, especially the meeting of the Cro-Magnon man and Neanderthals. This film had so much potential in exploring this, but instead it was executed poorly as a "horror" film without any real horror. As others have said, most of the film is too dark to see, a lot of running and hiding, jump scares.

What really disappointed me is the lack of simple research in the topic for such a film. The depiction of the Neanderthals and the first Cro-Magnon into Europe after the ice age were completely scientifically off. This makes people who actually know enough of the subject unable to suspend their disbelief.

I'll give this a 4 for the creativity and concept. However, if you really want to watch a good film on this topic, I suggest the NOVA special from 20 years ago which covers it in detail and filmed it with high quality aesthetics.

4/10.

I watched Out of Darkness "early" as part of AMC's Screen Unseen. I put early in quotes because apparently this is a 2022 movie that took two years to reach theaters. I can see why. It doesn't belong in theaters. It belongs in the endless abyss of underwhelming and unmemorable streaming movies.

This movie has very little substance. Not much happens. I can summarize the entire thing in a few short sentences. The story is not engaging. You barely learn anything about the characters. So you don't care about them or understand their decisions.

They spend the entire movie teasing you until a fully underwhelming and generic "payoff." It made me roll my eyes. And it has a message we've seen a million times before, but executed in a clunky fashion.

(1 viewing, early screening Screen Unseen 1/29/2024)

So a group of Stone Age wanderers are searching the bleak wilderness for a new home when they begin to suspect that they are being stalked. Noises in the woods unsettle them, but they see nothing. Suddenly, though, one of their number is taken and the leader "Adem" (Chuku Modu) must make some difficult choices to ensure the survival of both his son and of his pregnant wife. The denseness of the Scottish forestry along with some creative use of light, shadow and audio goes some way to keep the film interesting but the plot itself is really weak and the actors - perfect teeth, skin, leather clothing that wouldn't look out of place at a gay pride gathering - all deprive the thing of any sense of menace or grittiness. It's difficult to watch without thinking the production caravan is just three feet out of shot! The redeeming feature may be an impressibly natural performance from Safia Oakley-Green ("Beyah") but I'm afraid for the most part, I struggled to remain engaged and the ending, well that was just rushed and a little disappointing too. I would still suggest you watch it, if you get the opportunity - but on the television is fine and don't expect to be scared.

My wife and I attended a screening of the UK film 🇬🇧 Out of Darkness (2022) in theaters last night. The storyline follows a group of individuals working together during prehistoric times, seeking a new home and means of survival. Arriving in a new land with limited resources, they hunt for survival only to discover they are not the sole hunters.

Directed by Andrew Cumming in his major motion picture debut, the film stars Chuku Modu (Captain Marvel), Safia Oakley-Green (She Said), Kit Young (Shadow and Bone), Arno Lüning (Bad Girls), and Luna Mwezi (Needle Park Baby).

A well-crafted picture with a premise reminiscent of 13th Warrior, the cinematography, attire, and props authentically transport you to the era, conveying the desperation for survival and lack of hope. The characters' unity in the face of madness is palpable. While the big reveal didn't resonate with me as expected, it's a smart twist depicting evolution. The film captures a time that could well be a forgotten true story. Solid horror elements, noteworthy kills, and impressive gore contribute to the experience.

In conclusion, Out of Darkness possesses worthwhile elements but falls slightly short of its potential. I would give it a 5.5-6/10 and recommend watching it at least once.

The movie begins interestingly enough as we are introduced to the characters. There are subtitles as the characters speak a language developed for the film and the story telling around the fire does have a good atmospheric effect, but very quickly the characters begin to distract from that atmosphere. This group of Northern Europeans from 45,000 years ago is made up of what appears to be three people of at least partial African descent, one of Middle Eastern descent and one Caucasian, all of whom have short or close cropped haircuts you'd be unsurprised to see today. The skins they wear are almost modern in their appearance and they are sewn and stitched again in what appears a very modern way. From here the movie continues to be an uneven mashup of entertaining suspense followed by confusing choices while not quite allowing the viewer to suspend disbelief. Loose ends abound from the odd black goo discovered after a major plot point, to the gory "slaughterhouse" area found all the while decrying the lack of game to hunt. It seems forced and manufactured and worst of all the villainous force at the end is comical and absurd. Also, the slaughtered mammoth that is found seems to be related to the villain, but again, that too adds to the absurdity. By the end of the movie, I was out of patience and ready to leave. Very mediocre and ok to watch for free somewhere but don't pay for it.