The lives of five young villagers change forever when a strange and powerful woman arrives, claiming one of them is the child of an ancient prophecy with the power to tip the balance between... Read allThe lives of five young villagers change forever when a strange and powerful woman arrives, claiming one of them is the child of an ancient prophecy with the power to tip the balance between Light and Dark forever.The lives of five young villagers change forever when a strange and powerful woman arrives, claiming one of them is the child of an ancient prophecy with the power to tip the balance between Light and Dark forever.
- Nominated for 1 BAFTA Award
- 2 wins & 9 nominations total
Browse episodes
Summary
Reviewers say 'The Wheel of Time' adaptation garners mixed reactions. Praise is directed towards world-building, cinematography, and Rosamund Pike's performance as Moiraine. Fans appreciate the effort to adapt Robert Jordan's expansive fantasy world. However, criticisms include deviations from the source material, rushed pacing, and altered character arcs. Some express disappointment with adaptation fidelity and the introduction of modern themes. Despite these issues, many remain optimistic about future seasons, hoping for improvements and closer alignment with the books.
Featured reviews
To start with, I have read the series of books and although they were not perfect, they were highly enjoyable and epic in their scale.
Now to the series.
A show or movies based on a book or series of books is generally bound to infuriate as the finished product cannot compare to the imagination of the reader, and there are not many examples of where this has been overcome.
So far I have been watching a show that has the main characters of the books relegated to supporting characters with little to no dialogue in some episodes.
There were over 2000 named characters in the book and they still felt the need to create new characters for the show that serve no real purpose.
The acting is fairly bad. With the amount of money spent on the cinematography, you would think they would have hired better actors.
I could see how someone who hasn't read the books would be confused as to what is going on, as the explanations as to what is going on are vague, which makes me wonder who this show was made for.
If it was to introduce people to the world that Robert Jordan created then they failed.
If it was for fans of the books, then they have again failed, as they have been changing things that didn't need to be changed and generally angering fans.
If you are going to adapt a series of books, then do so correctly, otherwise write your own original story and do what you want with it.
My positive takeaway from The Wheel of Time is that the cinematography is excellent, and unfortunately that is the only thing I find worthwhile.
Maybe it will get better, but I highly doubt it.
If you enjoy reading, I would recommend giving the series of books a glance, as this show is a pale reflection of the story Jordan wrote.
Now to the series.
A show or movies based on a book or series of books is generally bound to infuriate as the finished product cannot compare to the imagination of the reader, and there are not many examples of where this has been overcome.
So far I have been watching a show that has the main characters of the books relegated to supporting characters with little to no dialogue in some episodes.
There were over 2000 named characters in the book and they still felt the need to create new characters for the show that serve no real purpose.
The acting is fairly bad. With the amount of money spent on the cinematography, you would think they would have hired better actors.
I could see how someone who hasn't read the books would be confused as to what is going on, as the explanations as to what is going on are vague, which makes me wonder who this show was made for.
If it was to introduce people to the world that Robert Jordan created then they failed.
If it was for fans of the books, then they have again failed, as they have been changing things that didn't need to be changed and generally angering fans.
If you are going to adapt a series of books, then do so correctly, otherwise write your own original story and do what you want with it.
My positive takeaway from The Wheel of Time is that the cinematography is excellent, and unfortunately that is the only thing I find worthwhile.
Maybe it will get better, but I highly doubt it.
If you enjoy reading, I would recommend giving the series of books a glance, as this show is a pale reflection of the story Jordan wrote.
The Wheel of Time is an ambitious fantasy series based on Robert Jordan's iconic book series, bringing to life a sprawling world filled with magic, prophecy, and a battle between light and darkness. Visually, the show is stunning, with breathtaking landscapes, detailed costumes, and a rich cultural tapestry that sets it apart from other fantasy adaptations. The special effects and world-building are genuinely impressive, capturing the epic scale and complexity of the source material. Rosamund Pike delivers a powerful performance as Moiraine, grounding the story with wisdom and mystery. The supporting cast also brings energy and diversity, representing the wide array of cultures and nations that exist within the Wheel's turning. However, despite all these strengths, the show's momentum is noticeably held back by the portrayal of its central character, Rand al'Thor, played by Josha Stradowski. While the character is meant to evolve from a humble farmer to a world-changing figure, Stradowski's performance often feels flat, lacking the emotional depth and inner turmoil that defines Rand's journey in the books. His stoic demeanor comes across more as wooden than reserved, making it difficult to connect with him or fully invest in his transformation. Given the importance of Rand to the overall narrative, this casting misstep significantly impacts the emotional resonance of the series. One can't help but wonder how much stronger the show could have been with a more dynamic actor in the lead role-someone capable of conveying the vulnerability, fear, and reluctant heroism that Rand embodies. For instance, imagining an actor with the nuanced charm and range of a young Daniel Radcliffe, best known for his portrayal of Harry Potter, could have dramatically altered the feel of the series. Radcliffe's ability to grow with a character and express internal conflict would have added layers to Rand's arc, making the story more compelling and emotionally grounded. That said, the rest of the ensemble cast works hard to elevate the material, and the showrunners deserve credit for attempting to streamline an incredibly dense series into a television format. The narrative pacing has its highs and lows, occasionally feeling rushed or disjointed, especially for those unfamiliar with the books. Still, fans of the series will appreciate the nods to the original lore and the attempts to stay true to the themes of balance, destiny, and the cyclical nature of time. With strong female leads, diverse representation, and a deep mythology, The Wheel of Time has a lot going for it, but it also struggles under the weight of its own expectations. If the central performance had been more engaging, it could have elevated the entire production to a different level. Instead, the series sometimes feels like it's spinning in place, trying to find its emotional core. Despite this, there's still potential for growth, especially if the character development sharpens in future seasons. As it stands, The Wheel of Time is a visually rich and thematically ambitious adaptation that is held back by uneven acting and some awkward narrative choices-but with a few key changes, it could still become one of the greats in modern fantasy television.
It is simply impossible to translate a written story of 10 thousand pages into a TV series with only a few episodes (each 1 hour or less). There are so many things left outside than people that have not read the books will sooner than later find things hard to follow or even to understand. However, having said that, I believe this series is great, lots of resources have been used or spent to make it as close to the books as possible. Also I personally have discovered quite a few actors and actresses that previously I did not know. Acting is really good for most key characters, specially those that portrait strong mature women such as Moiraine, Siouan, Elaine... But do not forget about others like Lan.
This show is incredibly good. Season 1 is a bit slow, but when u reach season 2 and onwards its getting very good.
I dont understand people who hate on this. This is a really good show. Even the LOTR movies were fully accurate to the books and yet people praised them. From ghe little stuff I read on the internet about this book series a lot is accurate, but maybe not all.
I love the characters, the story, the CGI and the monsters. There is even a couple of cool battles. I wanna see whats next, the evil guys in this show are very interesting, and the main character is also very cool.
Amazon shouldnt sleep on this honestly and should cook up seasons up to the end of the books.
I dont understand people who hate on this. This is a really good show. Even the LOTR movies were fully accurate to the books and yet people praised them. From ghe little stuff I read on the internet about this book series a lot is accurate, but maybe not all.
I love the characters, the story, the CGI and the monsters. There is even a couple of cool battles. I wanna see whats next, the evil guys in this show are very interesting, and the main character is also very cool.
Amazon shouldnt sleep on this honestly and should cook up seasons up to the end of the books.
First of all, forget the books - while the general premise is there, there is a different path that leads to each "key" moment, even if that path alters the characters singificantly or generally cutting corners (inevitably, due to the size of the original work).
Admittedly the first two seasons might seem a bit lacking in structure at points, or lacking in character development, or explaining important concepts, with each such moment coming down as a missed opportunity. I have to say that the third season really improves in everything. And even the overall quality of visual and sound effects is very high. Very much satisfied with how this monumental task is shaping and can't wait to see what comes next.
Admittedly the first two seasons might seem a bit lacking in structure at points, or lacking in character development, or explaining important concepts, with each such moment coming down as a missed opportunity. I have to say that the third season really improves in everything. And even the overall quality of visual and sound effects is very high. Very much satisfied with how this monumental task is shaping and can't wait to see what comes next.
Renewed, Canceled, or Ending?
Renewed, Canceled, or Ending?
Check out our list of renewals and cancellations to see if your favorite show made the cut.
Did you know
- TriviaRobert Jordan's "The Wheel of Time" book series has 2,782 named characters.
- Crazy creditsThe opening titles are of a string breaking into different strands that crisscross and merge through looms to form a tapestry of the Aes Sedai group.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Jeremy Vine: Episode #4.235 (2021)
Behind the Scenes of "The Wheel of Time"
Behind the Scenes of "The Wheel of Time"
We stepped inside the world of "The Wheel of Time" Season 2 with a sneak peek at sets, costumes, and more.
- How many seasons does The Wheel of Time have?Powered by Alexa
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content