Beautiful journey through the depths of the underwater world as we witness a gripping tale of grief and healing unfold before our eyes.Beautiful journey through the depths of the underwater world as we witness a gripping tale of grief and healing unfold before our eyes.Beautiful journey through the depths of the underwater world as we witness a gripping tale of grief and healing unfold before our eyes.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Matteo Caruana Bond
- Valletta Resident
- (uncredited)
Paul Doolan
- Memorial attendee
- (uncredited)
Maxime Durand
- Maltese Policeman
- (uncredited)
Tiziana Tedesco Triccas
- Bridesmaid
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Starfish," directed by Akhilesh Jaiswal and adapted from Bina Nayak's novel "Starfish Pickle," embarks on a narrative journey that, unfortunately, encounters turbulent waters. The film introduces us to Tara, portrayed by Khushalii Kumar, a diver entangled in the undertow of her past. Despite a promising start, the cinematic voyage is hindered by a choppy narrative, impulsive editing, and a screenplay that lacks finesse.
The initial chapters offer a glimpse into Tara's world, but impulsive edits disrupt the flow, hindering the audience's immersion. The film grapples with a momentary dip in engagement, struggling against a cinematic tide that refuses to be tamed. While Jim Edgar's cinematography captures stunning underwater scenes, it becomes a victim of the film's impulsive editing, overshadowing its potential impact.
Set against the enchanting backdrop of Malta, Tara's life as a diver and her struggle with PTSD are hindered by a screenplay that meanders lazily through thematic depths. Conflicts between moving on and confronting past wounds feel diluted, failing to leave a lasting impact. Relationships with Aman (Tushar Khanna) and Neel (Ehan Bhat) suffer from predictability, lacking the emotional depth intended.
Despite Khushalii Kumar's commendable performance, the film struggles to rise above its challenges. The attempt to deliver a compelling exploration of human emotions is marred by a choppy narrative and a screenplay that misses opportunities. While Jim Edgar's cinematography shines, it becomes a victim of the film's lack of cohesion.
In conclusion, "Starfish" falters in its attempt to provide a seamless and immersive cinematic experience. The film's untamed currents, represented by its choppy narrative and impulsive editing, may leave audiences grappling with cinematic confusion. Unfortunately, the lack of interest-inducing elements categorizes "Starfish" as a waste of time, failing to make the overall viewing experience compelling or worthwhile.
The initial chapters offer a glimpse into Tara's world, but impulsive edits disrupt the flow, hindering the audience's immersion. The film grapples with a momentary dip in engagement, struggling against a cinematic tide that refuses to be tamed. While Jim Edgar's cinematography captures stunning underwater scenes, it becomes a victim of the film's impulsive editing, overshadowing its potential impact.
Set against the enchanting backdrop of Malta, Tara's life as a diver and her struggle with PTSD are hindered by a screenplay that meanders lazily through thematic depths. Conflicts between moving on and confronting past wounds feel diluted, failing to leave a lasting impact. Relationships with Aman (Tushar Khanna) and Neel (Ehan Bhat) suffer from predictability, lacking the emotional depth intended.
Despite Khushalii Kumar's commendable performance, the film struggles to rise above its challenges. The attempt to deliver a compelling exploration of human emotions is marred by a choppy narrative and a screenplay that misses opportunities. While Jim Edgar's cinematography shines, it becomes a victim of the film's lack of cohesion.
In conclusion, "Starfish" falters in its attempt to provide a seamless and immersive cinematic experience. The film's untamed currents, represented by its choppy narrative and impulsive editing, may leave audiences grappling with cinematic confusion. Unfortunately, the lack of interest-inducing elements categorizes "Starfish" as a waste of time, failing to make the overall viewing experience compelling or worthwhile.
A parfum advertisement has more coherence that this film. It is like "mexican soap opera meets Bollywood". Countless continuity errors, stereotypical music, poor performances, in a display of exuberance and lavish locations. On the bright side, it can serve very well as a travel advertisement of Malta and southern Italy. If you are the type of person that can't sleep without some white noise or something in the background, this movie is perfect for you. Otherwise, don't bother.
As I have nothing else to say about this movie, I will write this final sentence to fill the gap in this review. Bye.
As I have nothing else to say about this movie, I will write this final sentence to fill the gap in this review. Bye.
Starfish is an absolute cinematic gem that captivates from start to finish. This visually stunning masterpiece weaves an intricate tale of love, resilience, and the indomitable human spirit against the backdrop of the mesmerizing underwater world. The breathtaking cinematography elevates the film to new heights, immersing the audience in a vibrant oceanic realm filled with awe-inspiring marine life. The stellar performances of the cast, led by the brilliant Lead Actor bring depth and authenticity to the characters, making their emotional journey truly resonate. The screenplay is a perfect blend of heartwarming moments and suspenseful twists, keeping viewers on the edge of their seats. The film's soundtrack is a symphony of emotions, enhancing every scene and creating a powerful connection with the audience. What sets Starfish apart is its profound message of hope and the Starfish apart is its profound message of hope that emerges from facing adversity. The director's visionary approach and attention to detail Starfish apart is its prawesomw best storyline profound message of hope
through, creating a cinematic experience that stays with you long after the credits roll.
Starfish apart is its profound message of hope.
Starfish apart is its profound message of hope.
Waste of resources and waste of time. If you have so much money, kindly give it to me. I'll make a better film than this. It's a migraine. No story, no talent with 10% potential. The director has made a mess. It looks like they've gone on a holiday and made this film. Watch if you want to waste your time. T-Series has produced this film, and there's not even one good song in the entire movie. At least for your family members (Khushhali Kumar), kindly make a good film and get a good composer next time. Khushhali Kumar's acting is very bad. Limited star cast, and they all are bad. It looks like black money; they wanted to turn it white, so they made this garbage called "Starfish."
I had to leave the movie in interval, I couldn't tolerate such a mess.
The Starfish movie, despite its ambitious premise, ultimately falls short of expectations on multiple fronts, leaving the viewer with a sense of dissatisfaction and missed potential.
One of the major drawbacks of the film lies in its narrative execution. The plot, which initially promised a unique and intriguing storyline, quickly devolves into a convoluted mess. The filmmakers seemed to prioritize style over substance, resulting in a confusing narrative that leaves the audience struggling to piece together the disjointed events. The lack of a cohesive and well-developed storyline undermines the entire viewing experience, leaving viewers disoriented and detached from the characters' journeys.
Character development is another notable weak point in Starfish. The film introduces a cast of characters with the potential for depth and complexity, yet their arcs remain underexplored and unconvincing. Viewers are left with one-dimensional characters who fail to evoke empathy or investment. The protagonist's motivations and internal struggles are particularly poorly conveyed, making it challenging for the audience to connect with or care about the central figure's fate. The film misses an opportunity to create a meaningful emotional impact, as the characters lack the depth needed to resonate with the audience on a personal level.
Pacing issues further exacerbate the film's problems. Starfish suffers from inconsistent pacing that oscillates between sluggish and frenetic, making it difficult for viewers to fully immerse themselves in the unfolding events. The abrupt shifts in tempo disrupt the narrative flow, hindering the establishment of a cohesive and engaging viewing experience. This lack of pacing cohesion results in a film that feels disjointed and haphazardly put together, preventing any sustained tension or emotional resonance.
Special effects, a crucial aspect of any modern sci-fi film, fail to impress in Starfish. The visual elements intended to bring the fantastical elements of the story to life appear lackluster and dated. In an era where audiences have come to expect cutting-edge CGI and immersive visual experiences, Starfish falls behind, relying on subpar effects that diminish the overall quality of the film. The lack of attention to detail in the visual presentation serves as a constant reminder of the film's budgetary constraints, detracting from the audience's ability to fully immerse themselves in the fictional world.
The film's soundtrack, rather than enhancing the viewing experience, proves to be a distraction. The music, seemingly discordant with the film's tone, fails to complement the on-screen action or evoke the desired emotional responses. Instead of contributing to a cohesive atmosphere, the soundtrack often feels like an afterthought, further highlighting the film's lack of attention to detail in crucial areas.
One of the film's most significant failings is its inability to deliver a satisfying resolution. The climax feels rushed and unsatisfying, leaving numerous unanswered questions and loose ends. Viewers are left feeling unfulfilled and wondering if there were aspects of the story that were overlooked or simply left unexplained. A well-executed resolution is essential for providing closure and leaving a lasting impression, and in this regard, Starfish falls disappointingly short.
In conclusion, Starfish, despite its initial promise, ultimately disappoints on multiple fronts. From a convoluted and poorly executed narrative to underdeveloped characters, inconsistent pacing, lackluster special effects, and an unsatisfying resolution, the film fails to deliver a compelling and engaging sci-fi experience. While ambitious in its concept, the execution leaves much to be desired, resulting in a cinematic endeavor that struggles to leave a lasting impact on its audience.
The Starfish movie, despite its ambitious premise, ultimately falls short of expectations on multiple fronts, leaving the viewer with a sense of dissatisfaction and missed potential.
One of the major drawbacks of the film lies in its narrative execution. The plot, which initially promised a unique and intriguing storyline, quickly devolves into a convoluted mess. The filmmakers seemed to prioritize style over substance, resulting in a confusing narrative that leaves the audience struggling to piece together the disjointed events. The lack of a cohesive and well-developed storyline undermines the entire viewing experience, leaving viewers disoriented and detached from the characters' journeys.
Character development is another notable weak point in Starfish. The film introduces a cast of characters with the potential for depth and complexity, yet their arcs remain underexplored and unconvincing. Viewers are left with one-dimensional characters who fail to evoke empathy or investment. The protagonist's motivations and internal struggles are particularly poorly conveyed, making it challenging for the audience to connect with or care about the central figure's fate. The film misses an opportunity to create a meaningful emotional impact, as the characters lack the depth needed to resonate with the audience on a personal level.
Pacing issues further exacerbate the film's problems. Starfish suffers from inconsistent pacing that oscillates between sluggish and frenetic, making it difficult for viewers to fully immerse themselves in the unfolding events. The abrupt shifts in tempo disrupt the narrative flow, hindering the establishment of a cohesive and engaging viewing experience. This lack of pacing cohesion results in a film that feels disjointed and haphazardly put together, preventing any sustained tension or emotional resonance.
Special effects, a crucial aspect of any modern sci-fi film, fail to impress in Starfish. The visual elements intended to bring the fantastical elements of the story to life appear lackluster and dated. In an era where audiences have come to expect cutting-edge CGI and immersive visual experiences, Starfish falls behind, relying on subpar effects that diminish the overall quality of the film. The lack of attention to detail in the visual presentation serves as a constant reminder of the film's budgetary constraints, detracting from the audience's ability to fully immerse themselves in the fictional world.
The film's soundtrack, rather than enhancing the viewing experience, proves to be a distraction. The music, seemingly discordant with the film's tone, fails to complement the on-screen action or evoke the desired emotional responses. Instead of contributing to a cohesive atmosphere, the soundtrack often feels like an afterthought, further highlighting the film's lack of attention to detail in crucial areas.
One of the film's most significant failings is its inability to deliver a satisfying resolution. The climax feels rushed and unsatisfying, leaving numerous unanswered questions and loose ends. Viewers are left feeling unfulfilled and wondering if there were aspects of the story that were overlooked or simply left unexplained. A well-executed resolution is essential for providing closure and leaving a lasting impression, and in this regard, Starfish falls disappointingly short.
In conclusion, Starfish, despite its initial promise, ultimately disappoints on multiple fronts. From a convoluted and poorly executed narrative to underdeveloped characters, inconsistent pacing, lackluster special effects, and an unsatisfying resolution, the film fails to deliver a compelling and engaging sci-fi experience. While ambitious in its concept, the execution leaves much to be desired, resulting in a cinematic endeavor that struggles to leave a lasting impact on its audience.
Details
- Runtime
- 2h 1m(121 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content