Winter War
- 2017
- Tous publics
- 2h 20m
IMDb RATING
3.9/10
327
YOUR RATING
January 1945. The first French regiment of paratroopers to fight with an American unit prepares to liberate Alsace in France during World War II.January 1945. The first French regiment of paratroopers to fight with an American unit prepares to liberate Alsace in France during World War II.January 1945. The first French regiment of paratroopers to fight with an American unit prepares to liberate Alsace in France during World War II.
- Awards
- 5 nominations total
Tommy-Lee Baïk
- Melbarte
- (as Tommy Lee Baïk)
Natale Naccari
- Moretti
- (as Naccari Natale)
James Larabee
- Franois Henaq
- (voice)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
They say that war is hours of boredom punctuated by moments of sheer terror. Well, they got the boredom right. Also, it is hard to relate to the characters, who spend more time whining and bickering than fighting the Germans.
The only review above 6 are obvious fakes (the guys created an account just to boost the ratings artificially). Everything is phoney about this movie.
I'm French, so the dubbing was not an issue. This French is atrociously bad, a mix of 2020 yoofspeak and stilted literary French. Besides, the actors are terrible. These amateurs spouting these uninspired, verbose and phoney lines are a painful sight to behold.
Obviously the director has no idea about small arms tactics. The action scenes are an insult to actual people who fought in this war. Everything is wrong in so many ways.
3 guys running 100 yards straight in front of an MG42, shooting the hapless and apparently blind bad guys, then running back another 100 yards ? I don't think so.
A whole platoon digging in in useless shallow foxholes, with nothing but rifles and SMGs? No mortars, no MGs, not even a sniper rifle? I don't think so.
Germans positioning their 8 cm mortars close enough to get picked off by regular M1 rifles? Sent into a rout by a gung-ho Frenchy standing in the middle of the woods, throwing a single grenade and popping a few rounds in their general direction? I don't think so.
Frankly I wonder where the guy found enough money to produce this pile of garbage.
I'm French, so the dubbing was not an issue. This French is atrociously bad, a mix of 2020 yoofspeak and stilted literary French. Besides, the actors are terrible. These amateurs spouting these uninspired, verbose and phoney lines are a painful sight to behold.
Obviously the director has no idea about small arms tactics. The action scenes are an insult to actual people who fought in this war. Everything is wrong in so many ways.
3 guys running 100 yards straight in front of an MG42, shooting the hapless and apparently blind bad guys, then running back another 100 yards ? I don't think so.
A whole platoon digging in in useless shallow foxholes, with nothing but rifles and SMGs? No mortars, no MGs, not even a sniper rifle? I don't think so.
Germans positioning their 8 cm mortars close enough to get picked off by regular M1 rifles? Sent into a rout by a gung-ho Frenchy standing in the middle of the woods, throwing a single grenade and popping a few rounds in their general direction? I don't think so.
Frankly I wonder where the guy found enough money to produce this pile of garbage.
Hi all
I have seen many comments criticizing the English dubbing but having seen the film in French VO I will not allow myself to judge as rajotd.
This film is a loyal historical testimony concerning the brave soldiers (american and french) who fought in the pocket of Colmar and the links between them.
Very well shot and with complete historical realism we note however the small budget allocated to the effects, more real than special ;-)
However, where the film draws all its excellence, it is in the singular story that it tells and in the links between close characters that it brilliantly highlights.
Throughout each scene, the director's passion is felt and during the course of the film we understand how the script has been worked to achieve this result.
Therefore it is a touching, realistic and ultimately both simple and complex film for the story it tells!
I have seen many comments criticizing the English dubbing but having seen the film in French VO I will not allow myself to judge as rajotd.
This film is a loyal historical testimony concerning the brave soldiers (american and french) who fought in the pocket of Colmar and the links between them.
Very well shot and with complete historical realism we note however the small budget allocated to the effects, more real than special ;-)
However, where the film draws all its excellence, it is in the singular story that it tells and in the links between close characters that it brilliantly highlights.
Throughout each scene, the director's passion is felt and during the course of the film we understand how the script has been worked to achieve this result.
Therefore it is a touching, realistic and ultimately both simple and complex film for the story it tells!
This is a WW2 film about disgruntled, weary soldiers from different nations in a frozen forest.
There is a lot of "smartness" to this. Some people won't like the disjointed dialog with pauses between lines, but that is how people spoke long ago. The constant "I interrupt the speaker cause I'm superior and he's inferior" dialog has been evolving in Western culture for the past 40 years.
But there was a time when being a brat wasn't praised the way that being a brat is praised today. And you thought the Nazis lost the war?
The only real drawback is how predictable the fate is for almost every character. It follows the Hollywood formula guideline of contriving bullets to only hit characters who are relatable, but never can find characters who are just hateful for no reason.
That, of course, has almost always been the Hollywood formula, although it wasn't preached as much until the mid sixties on into the eighties.
Very contrived, very predictable, but the dramatics are very good, and the characters do feel right for the times due to the constant pauses and lack of dialog among a tired group of soldiers.
There is a lot of "smartness" to this. Some people won't like the disjointed dialog with pauses between lines, but that is how people spoke long ago. The constant "I interrupt the speaker cause I'm superior and he's inferior" dialog has been evolving in Western culture for the past 40 years.
But there was a time when being a brat wasn't praised the way that being a brat is praised today. And you thought the Nazis lost the war?
The only real drawback is how predictable the fate is for almost every character. It follows the Hollywood formula guideline of contriving bullets to only hit characters who are relatable, but never can find characters who are just hateful for no reason.
That, of course, has almost always been the Hollywood formula, although it wasn't preached as much until the mid sixties on into the eighties.
Very contrived, very predictable, but the dramatics are very good, and the characters do feel right for the times due to the constant pauses and lack of dialog among a tired group of soldiers.
The dubbed-in English dialogue is so cliche-ridden, it's hard to believe that it was an accurate translation from the French. Can a screenwriter really be that bad in two different languages? Plus, the voiceover actors are so bad, it just calls further attention to the awful dialogue. On the plus side, the historically inaccurate large white parachute emblems on the front of many of the helmets--the ones that blared out to the Germans, "Shoot here! It's where my forehead is."--was a creative touch.
- How long is The Frozen Front?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Frozen Front
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 2h 20m(140 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content