IMDb RATING
6.8/10
18K
YOUR RATING
Based on "The Little Broomstick" by Mary Stewart, a strange flower grants a girl magic powers.Based on "The Little Broomstick" by Mary Stewart, a strange flower grants a girl magic powers.Based on "The Little Broomstick" by Mary Stewart, a strange flower grants a girl magic powers.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 8 nominations total
Hana Sugisaki
- Mary
- (voice)
Ryûnosuke Kamiki
- Peter
- (Japanese version)
- (voice)
Yûki Amami
- Madam Mumblechook
- (voice)
Fumiyo Kohinata
- Doctor Dee
- (Japanese version)
- (voice)
Ken'ichi Endô
- Zebedee
- (voice)
Eri Watanabe
- Miss Banks
- (voice)
Ikue Ôtani
- Tib
- (voice)
Ruby Barnhill
- Mary
- (English version)
- (voice)
Kate Winslet
- Madam Mumblechook
- (English version)
- (voice)
Jim Broadbent
- Doctor Dee
- (English version)
- (voice)
Ewen Bremner
- Flanagan
- (English version)
- (voice)
Lynda Baron
- Great-Aunt Charlotte
- (English version)
- (voice)
Louis Ashbourne Serkis
- Peter
- (English version)
- (voice)
Morwenna Banks
- Miss Banks
- (English version)
- (voice)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Studio Ponoc, heir apparent to Studio Ghibli, makes a decent start with Mary & the Witch's Flower.
Animation is lush and gorgeous to look at, and is very reminiscent of the work we're used to from Studio Ghibli - and as anyone who's familiar with Ghibli's work can tell you, that is a pretty high bar to meet. I saw the English dubbed version, and the voice acting was excellent as well - especially Ruby Barnhill as Mary. Background score was quite good too.
Story, however, was a bit disappointing. Not saying that it was bad, it just felt a bit devoid of heart and there were quite a few plot holes which were hard to overlook. Character motivations were hard to explain, and the wizarding world Mary stumbles into feels empty, though it is supposed to be a thriving world. Then again, I complain because I was expecting something of Ghibli standards.
It was a fun movie to experience, and I'm glad Studio Ponoc exists - not only because I expect bigger and better things from them in the future, but also because something as beautiful as the tradition of Ghibli animated movies needs be kept alive.
7/10
Animation is lush and gorgeous to look at, and is very reminiscent of the work we're used to from Studio Ghibli - and as anyone who's familiar with Ghibli's work can tell you, that is a pretty high bar to meet. I saw the English dubbed version, and the voice acting was excellent as well - especially Ruby Barnhill as Mary. Background score was quite good too.
Story, however, was a bit disappointing. Not saying that it was bad, it just felt a bit devoid of heart and there were quite a few plot holes which were hard to overlook. Character motivations were hard to explain, and the wizarding world Mary stumbles into feels empty, though it is supposed to be a thriving world. Then again, I complain because I was expecting something of Ghibli standards.
It was a fun movie to experience, and I'm glad Studio Ponoc exists - not only because I expect bigger and better things from them in the future, but also because something as beautiful as the tradition of Ghibli animated movies needs be kept alive.
7/10
A lot of of low rated reviews based on the film being a Ghibli rip off, but it was created by many of THE SAME ANIMATORS from Ghibli so it is to be expected to be similar.
Anyway the film was decent, visually stunning great soundtrack and very creative. Could have been a better story and better character development but it's based on a book anyway so they couldn't really help that.
Looking forward to seeing more films from Studio Ponoc, they seem to have picked up from where Hayao Miyazaki left off.
Worth a watch.
Anyway the film was decent, visually stunning great soundtrack and very creative. Could have been a better story and better character development but it's based on a book anyway so they couldn't really help that.
Looking forward to seeing more films from Studio Ponoc, they seem to have picked up from where Hayao Miyazaki left off.
Worth a watch.
This film is more like Studio Gibhli films than Gibhli's own output, if Earwig and the Witch is anything to go by. It combines so many classic tropes like the young girl protagonist, flying setting, witches, cats, etc. That it struggles to find its own unique voice except for visually. The animation of this film was amazingly beautiful, detailed and dynamic. Too bad the story is so thin, as Mary doesn't have much development and just outperforms everyone constantly.
These reviews here lead me to believe the movie was going to be boring or something. It's entertaining the entire way through. Best movie I've seen in the cinema in over a year.
Sure it's not as good as Spirited Away, but that was rated as the best animated film of the 2000s so of course it's going to be hard to beat.
The soundtrack in this film is great, lots of recurring themes in the right times. The animation is lush and looks like it came from Ghibli. I really don't see why anyone wouldn't like this movie, it was really good.
Go see it for yourself, don't listen to the reviews. The story was good, the animation was good, the sound was good.
Sure it's not as good as Spirited Away, but that was rated as the best animated film of the 2000s so of course it's going to be hard to beat.
The soundtrack in this film is great, lots of recurring themes in the right times. The animation is lush and looks like it came from Ghibli. I really don't see why anyone wouldn't like this movie, it was really good.
Go see it for yourself, don't listen to the reviews. The story was good, the animation was good, the sound was good.
There were a few reasons for wanting to see 'Mary and the Witch's Flower'. Personally am a big lifelong animation and anime fan. The story certainly sounded very charming. It was directed by the same director responsible for 'When Marnie Was There' and 'Arietty', both excellent films (especially the latter). Anything that has Kate Winslet or Jim Broadbent involved with it in any way is also a guaranteed viewing, every bit as much when both are in the same film.
'Mary and the Witch's Flower' is on the whole a good nicely done film with a number of great aspects. Have seen superior animes, and between this, 'When Marnie Was There' and 'Arietty' this is the weakest by quite some margin. While enjoying 'Mary and the Witch's Flower', it did have potential to be great but the uneven storytelling stops that from happening somewhat. Recommendable still, but part of me was a little disappointed.
Its best aspect is the animation, which is gorgeous and never less than that. The attention to detail and lavish colours are a feast, the characters look expressive in a nuanced way and movements and transitions are so seamless. The music also works a lot, very atmospheric and beautifully orchestrated with a nice mix of the understated, the whimsical and the more stirring.
Did find the characters appealing, even if they are not deep. The main character was rootable enough though the supporting characters were more colourful in personality. There is plenty of charm and heart, and the film works best in the simpler, quieter moments. The script is neither too simplistic or too convoluted while the voice cast is top notch, notably Winslet.
However, the story can be too slight and predictable and the final act is on the rushed side.
Also do wish that character motivations were delved into deeper, too many of them were either not clear or basically there with not enough under the surface.
Overall though, worth watching while not being a must see. 7/10.
'Mary and the Witch's Flower' is on the whole a good nicely done film with a number of great aspects. Have seen superior animes, and between this, 'When Marnie Was There' and 'Arietty' this is the weakest by quite some margin. While enjoying 'Mary and the Witch's Flower', it did have potential to be great but the uneven storytelling stops that from happening somewhat. Recommendable still, but part of me was a little disappointed.
Its best aspect is the animation, which is gorgeous and never less than that. The attention to detail and lavish colours are a feast, the characters look expressive in a nuanced way and movements and transitions are so seamless. The music also works a lot, very atmospheric and beautifully orchestrated with a nice mix of the understated, the whimsical and the more stirring.
Did find the characters appealing, even if they are not deep. The main character was rootable enough though the supporting characters were more colourful in personality. There is plenty of charm and heart, and the film works best in the simpler, quieter moments. The script is neither too simplistic or too convoluted while the voice cast is top notch, notably Winslet.
However, the story can be too slight and predictable and the final act is on the rushed side.
Also do wish that character motivations were delved into deeper, too many of them were either not clear or basically there with not enough under the surface.
Overall though, worth watching while not being a must see. 7/10.
Did you know
- TriviaThe debut film of Studio Ponoc.
- GoofsIt is set in England, but the girl rehearsing arriving at her new but ordinary school bows to the teacher. Maybe normal in Japan, but not in modern Britain.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Chris Stuckmann Movie Reviews: Mary and the Witch's Flower (2018)
- SoundtracksRAIN
Music by Shin'ichi Nakajima (as Nakajin), Saori Fujisaki (as Saori) and Satoshi Fukase (as Fukase)
Lyrics by Saori Fujisaki (as Saori) and Satoshi Fukase (as Fukase)
Performed by Sekai no Owari (as SEKAI NO OWARI)
Courtesy of Toy's Factory
- How long is Mary and the Witch's Flower?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Mary and the Witch's Flower
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $2,418,404
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $348,475
- Jan 21, 2018
- Gross worldwide
- $42,170,708
- Runtime
- 1h 43m(103 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content