In the year 1922, a rancher conspires to murder his wife for financial gain and convinces his teenage son to participate.In the year 1922, a rancher conspires to murder his wife for financial gain and convinces his teenage son to participate.In the year 1922, a rancher conspires to murder his wife for financial gain and convinces his teenage son to participate.
- Awards
- 1 win & 4 nominations total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Despite Stephen King being one of my favorite authors I have to admit I'd never even heard of 1922 let alone read it.
I tend to enjoy Stephen King adaptations, they're not all flawless but many have been outstanding and therefore I do tend to seek them out.
1922 is one of two Stephen King Adaptations released by Netflix in the same year beside the disapointing Geralds Game. It stars Thomas Jane & Neal McDonough set in *Drumroll* 1922. It tells the story of a farmer who with the aid of his 14yr old son decides to kill off his wife to maintain the life he is acustomed to and for financial security.
The movie is dark, gritty and sombre as you would imagine and Jane may well be at a career best here.
If you're expecting horror you will find very little, that simply isn't what 1922 is. If it had to be compared to anything I'd say Edgar Alan Poe's a Telltale Heart would be a good fit.
It doesn't make for the easiest viewing and has elements from Of Mice & Men (That she tell you all you need to know) but regardless it is a powerful piece that managed to entertain even despite my initial concerns.
The Good:
Thomas Jane is excellent
Great narration
Looks fantastic
The Bad:
Not for animal lovers
Difficult viewing
Questionable pacing
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Not that I thought about it at all but he made some weird choices in covering up the murder *Ahem* not that I in anyway put deep thought into getting away with murder
I tend to enjoy Stephen King adaptations, they're not all flawless but many have been outstanding and therefore I do tend to seek them out.
1922 is one of two Stephen King Adaptations released by Netflix in the same year beside the disapointing Geralds Game. It stars Thomas Jane & Neal McDonough set in *Drumroll* 1922. It tells the story of a farmer who with the aid of his 14yr old son decides to kill off his wife to maintain the life he is acustomed to and for financial security.
The movie is dark, gritty and sombre as you would imagine and Jane may well be at a career best here.
If you're expecting horror you will find very little, that simply isn't what 1922 is. If it had to be compared to anything I'd say Edgar Alan Poe's a Telltale Heart would be a good fit.
It doesn't make for the easiest viewing and has elements from Of Mice & Men (That she tell you all you need to know) but regardless it is a powerful piece that managed to entertain even despite my initial concerns.
The Good:
Thomas Jane is excellent
Great narration
Looks fantastic
The Bad:
Not for animal lovers
Difficult viewing
Questionable pacing
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Not that I thought about it at all but he made some weird choices in covering up the murder *Ahem* not that I in anyway put deep thought into getting away with murder
I loved it from start to end. Thomas Jane gives another excellent performance!
The plot is thrilling and makes you want to keep watching even if it's a slow-paced film. It reminded me a lot of old school horror/suspense films from the 80's. The ones that didn't depend on jump-scares or stupid demonic creatures to make the whole movie.
Don't listen to those few people arguing the film was boring because it was slow. Maybe they're used to jump-scares and serial killers. This is a very simple but deep plot that is worth seeing.
The plot is thrilling and makes you want to keep watching even if it's a slow-paced film. It reminded me a lot of old school horror/suspense films from the 80's. The ones that didn't depend on jump-scares or stupid demonic creatures to make the whole movie.
Don't listen to those few people arguing the film was boring because it was slow. Maybe they're used to jump-scares and serial killers. This is a very simple but deep plot that is worth seeing.
I didn't know what to expect from this movie, and I hadn't even heard about it prior to finding it on Netflix. I decided to sit down and watch it solely because of the fact that it had Thomas Jane in the lead role.
The movie has a very nicely constructed storyline, especially since director Zak Hilditch was so adept at letting the story carry itself and build up momentum.
There was some really good acting from an equally nice cast. I will say that Thomas Jane was expertly cast for this role, and he really lived up to the role in every sense. He was very believable and pulled it off quite nicely.
The rats were a fantastic image of Wilfred's guilt gnawing at him and gradually breaking down his psyche. There was a very good atmosphere throughout the entire movie.
The great costumes and make-up also helped the movie along quite nicely.
If I have to put my finger on something here, then I would say that the storyline did suffer from being somewhat predictable though.
The movie has a very nicely constructed storyline, especially since director Zak Hilditch was so adept at letting the story carry itself and build up momentum.
There was some really good acting from an equally nice cast. I will say that Thomas Jane was expertly cast for this role, and he really lived up to the role in every sense. He was very believable and pulled it off quite nicely.
The rats were a fantastic image of Wilfred's guilt gnawing at him and gradually breaking down his psyche. There was a very good atmosphere throughout the entire movie.
The great costumes and make-up also helped the movie along quite nicely.
If I have to put my finger on something here, then I would say that the storyline did suffer from being somewhat predictable though.
My thoughts:
1 - the movie was very similar to the novella which is a great thing.
2 - The actors portraying Wilf and Hank nailed the characters.
3 - No CGI that I could notice. The movie relied on subtlety and didn't try to explain everything detail.
4 - My wife enjoyed it, and she is a tough big to crack.
1 - the movie was very similar to the novella which is a great thing.
2 - The actors portraying Wilf and Hank nailed the characters.
3 - No CGI that I could notice. The movie relied on subtlety and didn't try to explain everything detail.
4 - My wife enjoyed it, and she is a tough big to crack.
If you're ever depressed, and think your life is crap, watch this movie. You'll see how bad things could be.
Stephen King Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating
Stephen King Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating
See how IMDb users rank the feature films based on the work of Stephen King.
Did you know
- TriviaStephen King himself has expressed his satisfaction with the adaptation of "1922," stating that he was "delighted by the film." His endorsement further adds to the appeal of the movie for fans of his work.
- GoofsThe various currencies found around the house are small $20 Bills,they where only made after 1929. All the currency should have been large size notes (not in terms of denominations but physical size).
- Quotes
Wilfred James: I discovered something that night that most people never have to learn. Murder is sin. Murder is damnation. But murder is also work.
- Crazy creditsVintage end credits.
- How long is 1922?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 42m(102 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content