[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

The Misty Green Sky

  • 2016
  • 1h 21m
IMDb RATING
2.0/10
269
YOUR RATING
The Misty Green Sky (2016)
ActionAdventureAnimationSci-Fi

A young girl in another solar system asks an innocent question that sets off a chain reaction of adventure, destruction and tragedy.A young girl in another solar system asks an innocent question that sets off a chain reaction of adventure, destruction and tragedy.A young girl in another solar system asks an innocent question that sets off a chain reaction of adventure, destruction and tragedy.

  • Directors
    • Jack Foster
    • Jack Foster
  • Writer
    • Jack Foster
  • Stars
    • Jeremy Harkless
    • Tiffany Lindstrom
    • Maggie H. Taylor
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    2.0/10
    269
    YOUR RATING
    • Directors
      • Jack Foster
      • Jack Foster
    • Writer
      • Jack Foster
    • Stars
      • Jeremy Harkless
      • Tiffany Lindstrom
      • Maggie H. Taylor
    • 16User reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Photos182

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 178
    View Poster

    Top cast3

    Edit
    Jeremy Harkless
    • God…
    Tiffany Lindstrom
    • Gwen
    Maggie H. Taylor
    • Emma Dante…
    • Directors
      • Jack Foster
      • Jack Foster
    • Writer
      • Jack Foster
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews16

    2.0269
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    2kaefab

    why even bother

    At least could have good design this is awful for 2016 looks like a high school project gone wrong
    2tadam-51245

    What were they trying for here???

    Other reviewers have mentioned the graphics and CGI work. For those of you who may have seen the animated TV series "Reboot", the look is very similar. Not as well done as in Reboot, but similar.

    What it lacks, however are: Interesting characters, a cohesive plot, decent voice-over actors, and good writing. Ever play any of those problem-solving/exploratory games, the kind that "Myst" led to? This production is much like those interludes where you, through your avatar, have to stop and talk to a characters that appear throughout the game. Now, take those interludes and run them non-stop, back-to-back, and that's what watching this movie is like.

    I appreciate their effort, but...................
    3woodgatejack-sfr

    Padded

    Looking past the cheap CGI, There is about twenty minutes of actually rather good story in here, but a lot of sub-plots that go nowhere. scenes that just go on and vignettes that don't really serve the story (including a bit of gratuitous fan-service), all padding out the run-time. Were this a 15 to 25 minute short, it may have been worth watching, but even with state-off-the-art production values, I think I still would be bored with all the extraneous stuff.
    2nmn34

    I'm 90% Positive This Was Porn

    There is no graphic sex scenes in this movie but through analysis, from a third party of course, this was quite obviously intended to be porn. Maybe not a movie, more than likely a download game with still images, but this was most definitely intended to titillate. Its easy to tell where the time went creating the models. Female models were made to look as attractive as possible. They wear very revealing clothes, have expressive faces, and aren't too unpleasant to look at. At one point the lead girl is running around topless. Then she puts on a shirt that is somehow even more revealing. Male models are ugly and likely stock. Neither was meant to be used in a motion picture. There is an attempt to make the characters expressive, but it was quite honestly misplaced. Their faces never seem to show the right emotion for any given situation and are often the most ridiculous aspect. When they move, its very twitchy and floaty. They aren't a part of the scene so much as they are an overlay that slides into place. Its like there is a constant physics glitch and at any point, the girl sitting in a jungle is going to slide away on her butt. Even the way they move is jank. They almost ragdoll when they run, their arms flailing ridiculously and their legs seem to go into business for themselves whenever they need to do anything else. The voice acting is a whole nother can of worms. The IMDB page lists three actors doing three roles. There are more speaking characters. The number of actors is correct. There is not even n attempt to mask their voices, every character sounds exactly the same as the last one. On top of that, the actors are quite apparently not to actors. Their voices are flat and lack any humanity, almost like they were voiced by a speak and spell. And then there is the pacing. It is unfortunate this isn't porn, at least then the filler would be something interesting. About 60% of this movie is simply exposition shots of the character going somewhere else. Either they are walking, floating, or flying and its never as interesting as it sounds. There is a scene where three characters are flying somewhere. You see the shot of them flying. Then a close up on one of the girls doing something. Then the other girl doing something. And this then cuts too, drum roll... them still flying. Followed by a close up on the first girl in a new position. And then the second girl doing something whule hanging upside down. None of these people have any lines or even names, this is to set up the main character getting a new job.
    1catjohanson

    The Best Movie You Will Ever Behold

    The animation is terrifying, the plot convoluted, the voice-acting wooden, the characters utterly forgettable. Even the twist at the end is strange and poorly pulled.

    The models for this movie were clearly pre-generated and animated by someone with absolutely no experience. The facial expressions are especially bad, and there are some truly hilarious screen-shots out there.

    The storyline had so much potential with the message it was trying to give, but Jack Foster clearly has no skill in creating a well-paced plot that isn't confusing. The world-building is also poorly done, as it isn't believable and leaves many unanswered questions.

    The voice acting, well, I don't need to anything about that. Foster may as well have used computer generated voices. It would have sounded about the same.

    The majority of the characters are useless, and are only in the movie for the sake of existing. Gwen, the main character, was clearly created by a perverted asshat, as she spends the majority of the movie floating around in various states of nudity(seriously). As far as her personality, there is none to speak of, as with the rest of the cast. Her hair and clothes also change frequently, so it's hard to keep track of her.

    If you have a couple of hours to laugh your ass off, then this movie is the perfect one for you. I'd just skip the parts that are a bits slow, as most of them don't add to the story, which doesn't make sense anyway.

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Some of the character models are based on robots from other films and TV series, including two of Robby the Robot from Planète interdite (1956) and a Cybermen from Doctor Who (2005).
    • Connections
      References Planète interdite (1956)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ10

    • How long is The Misty Green Sky?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • October 15, 2016 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $50,000 (estimated)
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 21m(81 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Aspect ratio
      • 16 : 9

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.