The story of a man suffering from Schizophrenia and the psychotherapist who tries to find him with the help of his young Bi-Polar patient.The story of a man suffering from Schizophrenia and the psychotherapist who tries to find him with the help of his young Bi-Polar patient.The story of a man suffering from Schizophrenia and the psychotherapist who tries to find him with the help of his young Bi-Polar patient.
Dannah Kelly
- Mandy
- (as Dannah Basgall)
Featured reviews
The title of this review says all that needs to be said, but for the sake of the required 600-character minimum limit for reviews, I'll pad it out. A "film" - understood as a mature work of cinema - is shot on actual film (emphasis) - which requires a budget, implying resources not available to hacks who throw together videos...which this is. This flick is the most generic of slashers not worth the time of anyone with anything better to do (taking a walk, reading a book, visiting with a friend, even watching a real movie.) If you are among the easily entertained it may be worth your while. But I cannot imagine that the vast majority of th would-be audience cannot find something better to do than to submit to this drivel (with its accompanying loss of brain cells). I would give the flick a rating of "2" simply for the effort of creating something (or some "thing") but the obvious over-weighting of "10" by another reviewer needs serious correction for balance.
Death's Sonata is a brutal, unsettling indie horror film that leans heavily into psychological breakdown, religious symbolism, and bursts of shocking violence. It's ambitious and often intense, with some genuinely disturbing sequences-but it's also uneven in spots, and that keeps it from fully hitting the mark.
The story centers on Dr. William Fredrickson, a longtime psychotherapist who starts to suspect that his former patient Charles-diagnosed with schizophrenia-is behind a growing string of violent murders. Charles, now living off-grid in a remote hunting cabin, believes the Grim Reaper is speaking to him directly and ordering him to carry out killings. As the bodies pile up, Fredrickson recruits another patient, Matthew, to help track Charles down before the police get to him.
This isn't a slow, moody horror film. It's aggressive and often relentless. The gore is front and center when it hits, and it's not for the faint of heart-some of the kills are nasty, graphic, and deeply uncomfortable. But they're also grounded in the story, not thrown in for shock value. You really feel like you're watching someone unravel-and drag others down with him.
The performances are solid. Charles is played with a disturbing kind of fragility-he's both victim and threat, which keeps the audience unsettled. Fredrickson brings weight to the role of a man carrying guilt and doubt. Matthew adds unpredictability, though some of his arc feels rushed.
The film's biggest strengths are its commitment to tone and its willingness to go dark-really dark. The violence has consequences, the fear is rooted in psychological collapse, and the religious undertones give it an extra layer of unease. But it's not flawless. Some scenes feel choppy, the dialogue can be stiff, and there are moments where the narrative momentum slips.
The story centers on Dr. William Fredrickson, a longtime psychotherapist who starts to suspect that his former patient Charles-diagnosed with schizophrenia-is behind a growing string of violent murders. Charles, now living off-grid in a remote hunting cabin, believes the Grim Reaper is speaking to him directly and ordering him to carry out killings. As the bodies pile up, Fredrickson recruits another patient, Matthew, to help track Charles down before the police get to him.
This isn't a slow, moody horror film. It's aggressive and often relentless. The gore is front and center when it hits, and it's not for the faint of heart-some of the kills are nasty, graphic, and deeply uncomfortable. But they're also grounded in the story, not thrown in for shock value. You really feel like you're watching someone unravel-and drag others down with him.
The performances are solid. Charles is played with a disturbing kind of fragility-he's both victim and threat, which keeps the audience unsettled. Fredrickson brings weight to the role of a man carrying guilt and doubt. Matthew adds unpredictability, though some of his arc feels rushed.
The film's biggest strengths are its commitment to tone and its willingness to go dark-really dark. The violence has consequences, the fear is rooted in psychological collapse, and the religious undertones give it an extra layer of unease. But it's not flawless. Some scenes feel choppy, the dialogue can be stiff, and there are moments where the narrative momentum slips.
Death's Sonata is a good indie horror film-not perfect, but definitely one of the more engaging low-budget Horrors I've seen in a while. It has a few standout kills and some solid atmosphere, but what really surprised me was the acting. For an indie, the performances are strong across the board, with a cast that clearly commits to the material.
The biggest standout is Dr. Fredrickson. He's chilling-more evil, in many ways, than the masked killer stalking the characters. There's a coldness to him that really creeps under your skin. He's not your typical horror villain. Instead of brute force, his evil comes from a calm, manipulative intellect, which makes him all the more unsettling.
What really held my attention was the story. Indie horror films often fall into the trap of being all style and no substance, but this one kept me intrigued from start to finish. The plot centers around a therapist who's hunting for the one patient he failed, and in doing so, he's sending his current, weaker patients to their deaths-almost like they're bait or tools to reach a final objective. It's a disturbing concept, and it adds a layer of psychological horror that goes beyond just blood and gore.
There are still a few rough edges-some scenes could've used tighter editing or a bit more budget to fully land-but overall, Death's Sonata punches above its weight. If you're into horror that blends slasher violence with psychological depth, it's definitely worth checking out.
The biggest standout is Dr. Fredrickson. He's chilling-more evil, in many ways, than the masked killer stalking the characters. There's a coldness to him that really creeps under your skin. He's not your typical horror villain. Instead of brute force, his evil comes from a calm, manipulative intellect, which makes him all the more unsettling.
What really held my attention was the story. Indie horror films often fall into the trap of being all style and no substance, but this one kept me intrigued from start to finish. The plot centers around a therapist who's hunting for the one patient he failed, and in doing so, he's sending his current, weaker patients to their deaths-almost like they're bait or tools to reach a final objective. It's a disturbing concept, and it adds a layer of psychological horror that goes beyond just blood and gore.
There are still a few rough edges-some scenes could've used tighter editing or a bit more budget to fully land-but overall, Death's Sonata punches above its weight. If you're into horror that blends slasher violence with psychological depth, it's definitely worth checking out.
Okay, so I went into Death's Sonata expecting another backyard slasher with a spooky mask and dollar store blood. What I got instead? A gutted hymn of madness that crawled under my skin and stayed there.
Let's talk Charles. He's not your average slasher freak in a mask-he's like if Phantom of the Opera had unresolved trauma, a murder streak, and a funeral playlist stuck on repeat. The guy doesn't stalk... he suffers. And somehow, watching him fall apart while ripping people to shreds feels weirdly tragic. I didn't want to root for him, but halfway through, I was like, "Yeah, stab that guy. He kinda deserves it."
The kills are rough, personal, and almost too close for comfort. No flashy camera spins, no corny one-liners. Just raw violence that feels like it's happening down the block from you. And the score? It's like someone dug up an old church organ, possessed it, and made it weep blood. At first, it's distracting. Then it's unsettling. Then it's perfect.
Is it flawless? Hell no. Some scenes wobble, the budget bleeds through here and there, and a few side characters feel like they wandered in from a community theater production of CSI: Albany. But it never loses that grit. That pulse. That indie horror rage.
Bottom line: Death's Sonata doesn't ask you to like it. It dares you to sit with it. And if you do? You'll leave feeling a little haunted... and maybe a little dirty.
Score: 7.5 out of 10 Watch it if: You like your slashers bruised, bleeding, and barely holding it together.
Avoid it if: You need your horror spoon-fed and squeaky clean.
Let's talk Charles. He's not your average slasher freak in a mask-he's like if Phantom of the Opera had unresolved trauma, a murder streak, and a funeral playlist stuck on repeat. The guy doesn't stalk... he suffers. And somehow, watching him fall apart while ripping people to shreds feels weirdly tragic. I didn't want to root for him, but halfway through, I was like, "Yeah, stab that guy. He kinda deserves it."
The kills are rough, personal, and almost too close for comfort. No flashy camera spins, no corny one-liners. Just raw violence that feels like it's happening down the block from you. And the score? It's like someone dug up an old church organ, possessed it, and made it weep blood. At first, it's distracting. Then it's unsettling. Then it's perfect.
Is it flawless? Hell no. Some scenes wobble, the budget bleeds through here and there, and a few side characters feel like they wandered in from a community theater production of CSI: Albany. But it never loses that grit. That pulse. That indie horror rage.
Bottom line: Death's Sonata doesn't ask you to like it. It dares you to sit with it. And if you do? You'll leave feeling a little haunted... and maybe a little dirty.
Score: 7.5 out of 10 Watch it if: You like your slashers bruised, bleeding, and barely holding it together.
Avoid it if: You need your horror spoon-fed and squeaky clean.
Heard about this movie from Dread Central, who recommended it a few weeks back. I finally got around to watch and wasn't expecting much since it seems to be a low budget horror. I usually avoid them but since I've seen it recommended by multiple horror communities I gave it a shot.
I was pleasantly surprised. Mostly by the story that's about an obsessed nut job Psychotherapist using his week depressed young patient to find the one patient he couldn't cure. Who happens to be Crazy himself a Schizophrenic... People in town start dying mostly ex patients of the Psychotherapist. Then a detective gets involved and so on... But in the end its a low budget Indie Horror with some good violence and story.
I was pleasantly surprised. Mostly by the story that's about an obsessed nut job Psychotherapist using his week depressed young patient to find the one patient he couldn't cure. Who happens to be Crazy himself a Schizophrenic... People in town start dying mostly ex patients of the Psychotherapist. Then a detective gets involved and so on... But in the end its a low budget Indie Horror with some good violence and story.
Details
- Runtime1 hour 43 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content