A story about how synthetic humans can feel and even love and how the people they are involved with react to this concept.A story about how synthetic humans can feel and even love and how the people they are involved with react to this concept.A story about how synthetic humans can feel and even love and how the people they are involved with react to this concept.
Arlen Aguayo Stewart
- Woman on Lab Tour
- (as Arlen Aguayo-Stewart)
Walter Lyng
- Quiz Master
- (as Walter J. Lyng)
Featured reviews
8ndjs
The slow pacing will turn off many, but the story and implications of the subject matter fascinated me so much that I watched it a second time, this time through the eyes of knowing what was going to happen.
First review. Had to make an account to say this. The movie is really beautiful and raises a lot of questions I really had never thought about before. I went through a series of different emotions during this film and I thought it was really great. Performances were strong, the movie itself is beautifully shot... I might watch it again.
First off the movie is long and slow but it's gorgeous and thoughtful and posits a number of ideas related to AI and human/machine relationships once we've figured out how to surpass the uncanny valley and create unmistakably human like androids. How will they feel? Will they love, can we love them? What is love anyway? Both Ewan Macgregor and Lea Seydoux are stellar as they explore love, jealousy and loss between human and sentient machine. If you're patient and thoughtful, a very rewarding film.
'Her' meets 'Blade Runner' in this overly-derivative tale of an inventor of AI 'synethetics' who falls in love with his own creation. The story touches on how we willingly humanise technology for our own human desires, and how tolerance and acceptance might be extended to non-human life forms - and how they, in their evolving emotional intelligence, might tolerate, accept and pity us. But is it love? These are all interesting questions, but ultimately remain under-developed in this movie which fails to fully mine the heady themes it sets up. The narrative seems too obsessed with tribute nods to Blade Runner - mechanical voiced surveys, synthetics as sex toys, memory implants - and less interested in pushing its characters and questions to extremes in order to surprise and disturb. As a result, it fails the plausibility test that such futuristic stories undergo. It isn't convincing. At no point did I think, 'Yes, this is what we could become.' And that is where the film differs from Her and Blade Runner. This is a familiar story of boy meets girl, gets girl, loses girl, tries to win her back. The sentimental music is overly-manipulative. It's a teary love story, with light sci-fi decorations in the frame. Beautifully shot, and has decent acting performances, but ultimately bland and disappointing.
This could have been a very good movie. The plot is good and the acting is good, but being bombarded by "emotional" music (some even with lyrics) again and again and again, really cancels out the emotion it was supposed to evoke (in me at least).
Did you know
- TriviaCharlie Hunnam was originally cast in the lead role alongside Léa Seydoux but dropped out due to scheduling conflicts and was replaced by Ewan McGregor.
- GoofsAt 1:03:40 when Ash and Zoe are talking, you can clearly see that their cups are empty.
- Quotes
Jewels: You'd be surprised how many men come to me and don't want anything physical. Some just talk. Some just want forgiveness. What I've learned about men is that sometimes they don't really desire you. They desire the way you make them feel.
Zoe: But they... they know you're not real.
Jewels: The Designer only cares that we're real enough to make money.
- How long is Zoe?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $401,912
- Runtime
- 1h 44m(104 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content