IMDb RATING
8.1/10
1.6K
YOUR RATING
Control a civilization, from the beginnings of life, all the way towards the modern age. All while avoiding barbarians, gathering resources and dealing with the other civilizations. Will you... Read allControl a civilization, from the beginnings of life, all the way towards the modern age. All while avoiding barbarians, gathering resources and dealing with the other civilizations. Will your nation thrive?Control a civilization, from the beginnings of life, all the way towards the modern age. All while avoiding barbarians, gathering resources and dealing with the other civilizations. Will your nation thrive?
- Nominated for 1 BAFTA Award
- 1 win & 6 nominations total
Natasha Loring
- Advisor
- (voice)
Fatma Naguib
- Amanitore
- (voice)
- (as Fatma Abd Alsalam)
Alhan Gharam
- Saladin
- (voice)
Gianmarco Ceconi
- Trajan
- (voice)
Jorge Badillo
- Gilgamesh
- (voice)
Renato Belschansky
- Pedro II
- (voice)
Nervana Hesham Ali Hafez
- Cleopatra
- (voice)
- (as Nirvana Hisham)
Junchao Huang
- Qin Shi Huang
- (voice)
Irwin Daayán
- Montezuma
- (voice)
Pawan Shukla
- Gandhi
- (voice)
Featured reviews
I have really enjoyed this game! I do, however, thinks it takes a bit of time and experimentation to truly find your own personal and enjoyable play experience. For instance, I really enjoy everything being randomized on a large map with a slightly faster play speed, but others may hate that style - find what you enjoy.
I highly recommend this game for people who enjoy strategic and long-lasting board games. So far, I have won using Brazil, Aztec, France, and Egypt.
I highly recommend this game for people who enjoy strategic and long-lasting board games. So far, I have won using Brazil, Aztec, France, and Egypt.
Why design a game that is so difficult for new players that you lose ten games in a row on the easiest difficulty setting? That should be at least normal setting for those who have played the pc versions for a long time. There is just so many insane micromanage everything with so many different bonus' that really make little to no sense at all. Custom game never works as the game just decides for you. Its just not even enjoyable or really even playable. Will never invest another cent into this developer again.
I'm pretty sure I hate this game. I'm pretty sure I deleted it already and swore to never mention it every again. But I'm still playing it. Why am I still playing it??! I'm starting to neglect bodily functions, relationships, language, my identity. Is this game any good? Please don't ask me as I do not have a sentient self who can respond to that question.
I was at war for the majority of the game, in one city that the AI couldn't manage to take. It was a war that I could largely ignore as I went about the rest of the game, and that is just not fun. When you keep it going just to see if the PC can think a way to take it... it doesn't make for a fun game.
IV was my favorite and V I absolutely hated... and then came VI...
... there are points of this that I like and would want to keep in future installments. And then there is, well...
... once more it is like you are using a God Mod when you go to war, the AI still isn't there as far as strategy and you still need the ability to stack for it to be a threat.
But, like V, if you are playing with friends... the wars aren't as bad and the new way is actually a lot of fun... but civ isn't exactly a game made for group play, it's more of an alone time killer.
And it doesn't punish as much economically for having an empire, but it still discourages watching your armies sweep across the glob a little too much.
But the killer is still stacking units for me. I don't want to play a game where I can fight a war without having the outcome matter. I want to be able to lose... and you really can't with an AI that can't think well enough to keep the artillery in the rear. When you let the computer stack, you have more fun because the computer is more of a threat.
The AI isn't a strategic threat, and it still punishes the parts of the game that make it fun and replaces them with victories that aren't as satisfying to win.
IDK, I am hoping in the next installment, they will change things back to a stack, or make the AI smart enough to use the new war mechanics effectively.
IV was my favorite and V I absolutely hated... and then came VI...
... there are points of this that I like and would want to keep in future installments. And then there is, well...
... once more it is like you are using a God Mod when you go to war, the AI still isn't there as far as strategy and you still need the ability to stack for it to be a threat.
But, like V, if you are playing with friends... the wars aren't as bad and the new way is actually a lot of fun... but civ isn't exactly a game made for group play, it's more of an alone time killer.
And it doesn't punish as much economically for having an empire, but it still discourages watching your armies sweep across the glob a little too much.
But the killer is still stacking units for me. I don't want to play a game where I can fight a war without having the outcome matter. I want to be able to lose... and you really can't with an AI that can't think well enough to keep the artillery in the rear. When you let the computer stack, you have more fun because the computer is more of a threat.
The AI isn't a strategic threat, and it still punishes the parts of the game that make it fun and replaces them with victories that aren't as satisfying to win.
IDK, I am hoping in the next installment, they will change things back to a stack, or make the AI smart enough to use the new war mechanics effectively.
Did you know
- GoofsIn the loading screen briefing for Alexander, the wording says "Macedon" but the narrator says "Macedonia".
- ConnectionsFeatured in Outside Xbox: 8 Hardest Difficulty Modes You Will Never Finish (2017)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- Civ 6
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content