Marie Curie
- 2016
- Tous publics
- 1h 40m
IMDb RATING
5.6/10
1.7K
YOUR RATING
Follows the famous physicist and chemist Marie Curie and her struggle for recognition in the male-dominated science community in early 20th century France.Follows the famous physicist and chemist Marie Curie and her struggle for recognition in the male-dominated science community in early 20th century France.Follows the famous physicist and chemist Marie Curie and her struggle for recognition in the male-dominated science community in early 20th century France.
- Awards
- 4 wins & 8 nominations total
Izabela Kuna
- Bronia
- (as Iza Kuna)
Featured reviews
This is sadly not a film about a great woman who dedicated her life to science and paid the ultimate price in doing so. Rather it is simply yet another tedious promotion of today's feminist agenda telling us how terrible it was to be a woman in the past and (indirectly) how much we must strive to strengthen women's rights in the future. Marie Curie is simply the canvas used to restate this message for the millionth time.
It tells us nothing about her background, her early interests, her historical meeting with Pierre Curie or even the substance of the relationship between them. And most awful of all it tells us nothing of her actual work, how it was that Radium and Polonium were discovered and how this was received at the time.
Instead the film concentrates upon a series of soft porn, soft focus and heavily romantacised encounters between her and a married man whom she partnered after Pierre's death. Curie was then 44 and fairly full figured after having two daughters. But the actress in the film is nothing like that. She has a slim lithe body with perfectly neat compact breasts that would emulate a teenager. In short the woman who partnered a man becuase of shared scientific exploration is now displayed as a sex godess worthy of our admiration on physical grounds alone.
Do youself a favour. Chuck this film in the bin and watch the 1943 version instead. It is much much more rewarding.
It tells us nothing about her background, her early interests, her historical meeting with Pierre Curie or even the substance of the relationship between them. And most awful of all it tells us nothing of her actual work, how it was that Radium and Polonium were discovered and how this was received at the time.
Instead the film concentrates upon a series of soft porn, soft focus and heavily romantacised encounters between her and a married man whom she partnered after Pierre's death. Curie was then 44 and fairly full figured after having two daughters. But the actress in the film is nothing like that. She has a slim lithe body with perfectly neat compact breasts that would emulate a teenager. In short the woman who partnered a man becuase of shared scientific exploration is now displayed as a sex godess worthy of our admiration on physical grounds alone.
Do youself a favour. Chuck this film in the bin and watch the 1943 version instead. It is much much more rewarding.
Here the woman playing Marie talks with an accent and most momentous events in her life are depicted during the duration of her most tumultuous years. I enjoyed very much all these details that makes the story comes out as real and true. Beautiful film.
I just saw this film at the San Francisco Film Festival. I already knew about Madame Curie's scientific achievements so I was interested in the personal aspects that this film revealed.
The sexist aspects are relevant today. A woman tries to get recognition for her scientific achievements but is thwarted almost every step of the way. Nevertheless, she persisted....
It's a beautiful film, the cinematography is excellent. It's got an artistic feeling that I didn't expect from this period piece.
The sexist aspects are relevant today. A woman tries to get recognition for her scientific achievements but is thwarted almost every step of the way. Nevertheless, she persisted....
It's a beautiful film, the cinematography is excellent. It's got an artistic feeling that I didn't expect from this period piece.
If you expect a literal scientific bio of Marie Curie, it is not that film. However, Marie Noelle focuses on the protagonist as a woman, first of all, and then as a scientist fighting in the world of men-dominated academia. And this selection makes the film particularly interesting. Beautifully shot, with masterfully selected music, and splendid performance of Karolina Gruszka. You can watch it as a love story or more as a dedication to your love. A very inspiring tale of tenacity and courage.
This movie is not about Marie-Curie and her work, it's about romance and love.
You could replace Marie Skłodowska-Curie by French Maid or Nurse, and it wouldn't change much of the story in the movie.
If you desire to see romance movie - there are better than this one, if you want to know anything about Marie Skłodowska-Curie and her story, search the web.
Not recommended 3/10.
You could replace Marie Skłodowska-Curie by French Maid or Nurse, and it wouldn't change much of the story in the movie.
If you desire to see romance movie - there are better than this one, if you want to know anything about Marie Skłodowska-Curie and her story, search the web.
Not recommended 3/10.
Did you know
- TriviaTwo Nobel prizes in different fields: physics and chemistry.
- Crazy creditsHalfway through the ending credits, a sequence shows the characters of Marie Curie and Paul Langevin, in costume, strolling through modern-day Paris, with occasional onlookers staring and taking pictures.
- ConnectionsReferences Marguerite (2015)
- How long is Marie Curie: The Courage of Knowledge?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- Marie Curie et la Lumière Bleue
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $127,986
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $18,600
- Jul 2, 2017
- Gross worldwide
- $1,944,392
- Runtime1 hour 40 minutes
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content