Lumina follows four friends desperately searching for their abductee friend in a DUMB. Whether they find their friend or not in the deserts of the US to the sands of the Sahara, will change ... Read allLumina follows four friends desperately searching for their abductee friend in a DUMB. Whether they find their friend or not in the deserts of the US to the sands of the Sahara, will change their lives forever.Lumina follows four friends desperately searching for their abductee friend in a DUMB. Whether they find their friend or not in the deserts of the US to the sands of the Sahara, will change their lives forever.
Sidney Nicole Brooks
- Patricia
- (as Sidney Nicole Rogers)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
In the vast cosmos of science fiction cinema, where imaginative storytelling and visual spectacle often collide, "Lumina" attempts to carve out its own niche. However, it tragically falls short, earning its place in the annals of film history as one of the worst sci-fi movies ever made.
At its core, "Lumina" revolves around a dystopian future where humanity has harnessed a mysterious energy source known as Lumina, which promises to solve the world's energy crisis. Unfortunately, the film's premise is one of its few redeeming qualities. The narrative quickly devolves into a muddled mess, with plot holes so vast they could swallow entire planets. Characters are introduced with little to no development, leaving audiences struggling to connect with their motivations or stakes. The protagonist, a lackluster hero named Zara, played by an uninspired actress, is a prime example of this failure. Her journey from a disillusioned scientist to a reluctant savior feels more like a series of obligatory tropes than a coherent arc.
Visually, "Lumina" is a mixed bag. The film boasts some ambitious set designs and special effects, yet they are undermined by a glaring lack of coherence in execution. The CGI, which could have elevated the film's otherworldly aesthetic, often appears unfinished or poorly integrated. In one particularly egregious scene, a supposed alien landscape looks more like a poorly rendered video game from the early 2000s, pulling viewers out of the narrative and into a realm of unintentional comedy.
The dialogue is another significant flaw, with cringe-worthy lines that are more likely to elicit laughter than emotional engagement. The attempts at philosophical musings on energy consumption and environmentalism feel forced and preachy, lacking the subtlety that great sci-fi often employs to provoke thought. Instead, they come off as hollow platitudes, further distancing the audience from the film's already flimsy narrative.
Despite its shortcomings, "Lumina" does offer a few moments of unintentional humor and absurdity that may appeal to audiences seeking a so-bad-it's-good experience. However, these fleeting moments are not enough to redeem the overall experience.
In conclusion, "Lumina" serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of sci-fi filmmaking. With a weak script, poor character development, and lackluster visuals, it's a film that squanders its potential. While some might find enjoyment in its flaws, for most viewers, it will remain a forgettable entry in the sci-fi genre-an unfortunate reminder that not all journeys through the stars are worth taking.
At its core, "Lumina" revolves around a dystopian future where humanity has harnessed a mysterious energy source known as Lumina, which promises to solve the world's energy crisis. Unfortunately, the film's premise is one of its few redeeming qualities. The narrative quickly devolves into a muddled mess, with plot holes so vast they could swallow entire planets. Characters are introduced with little to no development, leaving audiences struggling to connect with their motivations or stakes. The protagonist, a lackluster hero named Zara, played by an uninspired actress, is a prime example of this failure. Her journey from a disillusioned scientist to a reluctant savior feels more like a series of obligatory tropes than a coherent arc.
Visually, "Lumina" is a mixed bag. The film boasts some ambitious set designs and special effects, yet they are undermined by a glaring lack of coherence in execution. The CGI, which could have elevated the film's otherworldly aesthetic, often appears unfinished or poorly integrated. In one particularly egregious scene, a supposed alien landscape looks more like a poorly rendered video game from the early 2000s, pulling viewers out of the narrative and into a realm of unintentional comedy.
The dialogue is another significant flaw, with cringe-worthy lines that are more likely to elicit laughter than emotional engagement. The attempts at philosophical musings on energy consumption and environmentalism feel forced and preachy, lacking the subtlety that great sci-fi often employs to provoke thought. Instead, they come off as hollow platitudes, further distancing the audience from the film's already flimsy narrative.
Despite its shortcomings, "Lumina" does offer a few moments of unintentional humor and absurdity that may appeal to audiences seeking a so-bad-it's-good experience. However, these fleeting moments are not enough to redeem the overall experience.
In conclusion, "Lumina" serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of sci-fi filmmaking. With a weak script, poor character development, and lackluster visuals, it's a film that squanders its potential. While some might find enjoyment in its flaws, for most viewers, it will remain a forgettable entry in the sci-fi genre-an unfortunate reminder that not all journeys through the stars are worth taking.
I went to watch this movie 'lumina' in a theatre in Wahington DC. The movie was very good as it's cast was very good, the main chracter tatiana (Eleanor Williams) is very good actor has she was very good in this role, I was amazed to watch this movie I have watched a sci fi movie after a long time which has both good chracters, good story, and good animations. This movie was totally good as I felt that it is not a movie it's all happening in real world, Out of all odds the director, writer, producer Gino McKoy is very good man as it is very difficult in current time to make a sci fi movie during this time.
I suppose I should start with the positives, there aren't many so this shouldn't take long. The cinematography is rather good in some parts. And that....is that.
Everything else is terrible. The script. The plot. The acting. The screenplay. The direction. The editing. The CGI. The music. All of it objectively bad. Not poor, but really bad.
The worst thing about it is the unstructured, uninteresting meandering nature of the film. It is just a collection of scenes that mean nothing.
The characters and their relationship to each other is non existent.
You always know a bad movie when Eric Roberts turns up to collect his pension. Although he was in The Dark Knight, so I will cut him some slack.
Everything else is terrible. The script. The plot. The acting. The screenplay. The direction. The editing. The CGI. The music. All of it objectively bad. Not poor, but really bad.
The worst thing about it is the unstructured, uninteresting meandering nature of the film. It is just a collection of scenes that mean nothing.
The characters and their relationship to each other is non existent.
You always know a bad movie when Eric Roberts turns up to collect his pension. Although he was in The Dark Knight, so I will cut him some slack.
Even in a world where sharknado and its ilk are made, I find it difficult to believe that someone would invest in and produce this.
The "plot" simultaneously is all over the place and goes absolutely nowhere. It is truly baffling that someone paid for this script and said, "I HAVE to make this".
You may think, "Well at least there must be some decent acting in it". You would be incorrect. Small town theaters provide more convincing performances than anyone involved in this delivers.
It is so very bad that I'm almost convinced that someone in charge decided early on that they were going to go for a Razzie or something.
The movie does not even have enough substance to be considered for a Golden Raspberry.
I've seen better things made by kids with cheap equipment on YouTube.
The "plot" simultaneously is all over the place and goes absolutely nowhere. It is truly baffling that someone paid for this script and said, "I HAVE to make this".
You may think, "Well at least there must be some decent acting in it". You would be incorrect. Small town theaters provide more convincing performances than anyone involved in this delivers.
It is so very bad that I'm almost convinced that someone in charge decided early on that they were going to go for a Razzie or something.
The movie does not even have enough substance to be considered for a Golden Raspberry.
I've seen better things made by kids with cheap equipment on YouTube.
Reading many past reviews seems conflicting as one isn't really sure what to think because it's all over the place. However, I'm here to give you a real honest review of this movie. The film quality is good as in the cinematography but here's what makes the movie bad...
There was no marketing for its release. It was very "under the radar". My guess is that even the producers felt this wasn't good enough for any form of marketing and they would be right. In my city, I was surprised to see the film poster for this and a limited release in theaters. Yet, I knew nothing about the film beforehand. The film poster is the only quality of this movie. The storyline is terrible and in some cases, not even believable. The actors are all unknown and their acting performances weren't good either. Even the music played throughout the film is bad, too.
I had hopes for this but was so disappointed in what it is. To me, it's a waste of script, film, and storyline. This didn't do it for me and I rate this 3/10.
There was no marketing for its release. It was very "under the radar". My guess is that even the producers felt this wasn't good enough for any form of marketing and they would be right. In my city, I was surprised to see the film poster for this and a limited release in theaters. Yet, I knew nothing about the film beforehand. The film poster is the only quality of this movie. The storyline is terrible and in some cases, not even believable. The actors are all unknown and their acting performances weren't good either. Even the music played throughout the film is bad, too.
I had hopes for this but was so disappointed in what it is. To me, it's a waste of script, film, and storyline. This didn't do it for me and I rate this 3/10.
Did you know
- TriviaThe film underwent a serious period of development hell and the deal for producing the film nearly went up in literal flames. During pre-production, one of the producer's planes crashed due to bad weather into the Colorado mountains and caught on fire upon crashing. Despite receiving severe burns and injuries, the producer miraculously survived and was rescued by firefighters. Among one of the few things to barely survive the crash fire was the producer's paper contract. Following the producer's survival and recovery, production on the film went forward.
- Crazy creditsThere is a scene in the end credits.
- ConnectionsReferences Le Magicien d'Oz (1939)
- SoundtracksE2ME3
composed by Gino McKoy
- How long is Lumina?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Kummaline juhtum
- Filming locations
- Marrakech, Morocco(Hotel)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 53 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content